Question are video card prices headed down yet?

Page 157 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Golgatha

Lifer
Jul 18, 2003
12,399
1,072
126
- I hope I don't find an altruistic seller. I'm not looking for anyone's charity. I'm looking for someone who values their time like money and is happy to sell a product at an agreeable price for the guarantee of a sale quickly. Someone who wants to move their merch quick and accepts that there is a cost associated with selling quick vs the time it would take to get market or above market pricing for their product.

I'm always open to a negotiation and if someone came back at my "lowball" with something I'm willing to accept then that's fine by me.
Golden Rule applies here. Treat others like you'd want to be treated. For me that's give a fair price, don't waste my time, and don't try and pull one over on me; you'll get what you give with me in terms of dealing with me in PMs too. My 100% positive Heatware (316 starting in 2003), eBay (471 starting in 1999), and FB Marketplace (5.0 starting in 2019) feedbacks speak for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAPUNISHER

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,032
32,501
146
For me that's give a fair price, don't waste my time,
Precisely.
and don't try and pull one over on me; you'll get what you give with me in terms of dealing with me in PMs too. My 100% positive Heatware (316 starting in 2003), eBay (471 starting in 1999), and FB Marketplace (5.0 starting in 2019) feedbacks speak for themselves.
Hear hear.

GPU value has remained high, I don't know why anyone thinks sellers are highly motivated for a quick sale? If you are low balling them, they have many months before depreciation will make the card worth that little.
 

Stg-Flame

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2007
3,683
631
126
Am I dumb or has AMD not released anything close to competing with the 5090 yet? I don't keep up to date with hardware until it's coming time for upgrades/new builds, but seeing some of these prices, it looks like I can either spend almost $3,000 or less than $750 to get each brand's top of the line cards. I understand the 5090 has double the VRAM and higher core speeds, but hasn't AMD made anything competitive yet? I refuse to spend almost an entire paycheck on a single piece of hardware, so I won't be grabbing anything Nvidia has to offer for quite some time, but the RX 9070 XT feels like a downgrade to my overclocked 3090 Ti. Not to mention, the 3090 was released almost four years ago and according to benchmarking sites, it still outperforms AMD's newest card.

Is AMD trying to capitalize on being the economic value card or am I missing something here?
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,583
7,704
136
Is AMD trying to capitalize on being the economic value card or am I missing something here?
Why would they make a big chip? They did it one (1) time in the entire RDNA history.
They made a chip that competes with the 5070 Ti and they have to sell it at a lower price.

Of course they're going for some economic value. How are they going to justify making a 700mm² GB202 fighter if they only get 5% of the sales?
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,170
19,191
146
How are they going to justify making a 700mm² GB202 fighter if they only get 5% of the sales?
Still one wonders if they could "cheaply" put two GPUs on one card like they used to do in the old days. Maybe once LPDDR6 is cheap enough since the VRAM will have to be duplicated.
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,583
7,704
136
Still one wonders if they could "cheaply" put two GPUs on one card like they used to do in the old days.
No, that would be useless. They need multiple chips working as a single GPU which means it won't be cheap. They have done it for other markets but gamers don't buy Radeon* so AMD has no incentive to actually build that. They will never make money building that for gamers. So they will never make it for gamers.

* within a margin of 5% error this is true
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,321
9,696
136
Still one wonders if they could "cheaply" put two GPUs on one card like they used to do in the old days. Maybe once LPDDR6 is cheap enough since the VRAM will have to be duplicated.

- That was kinda the goal of RDNA3, but the chips didn't clock high enough, AMD still couldn't get two GCDs to act as one, and any cost savings from higher yields got eaten up in additional packaging costs/complexities of GCD/MCD/Interposter etc.

Nvidia beat AMD's 530mm2 silicon with their 380mm2 silicon die.

Hell, basically the entire original RDNA4 lineup above N44 was scrapped and replaced by the N48 9070XT because the chiplet approach just wasn't a viable strategy for consumer grade parts at the prices people will pay for AMD grade hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and marees
Jul 27, 2020
28,170
19,191
146
They could put two GPU chips back to back and water cool it with an AIO but yeah, not many people will buy that. Nvidia has ruined the market of gamers who used to buy unique hardware for the fun of it and turned them into pragmatic zombies.
 

RnR_au

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2021
2,689
6,140
136
"Natively supported" for the developer to hand schedule their rendering across multiple graphics cards (no one does)
Yeah only enterprise cards does this and only because such workloads are usually embarrassingly easy to parallelise.

This is now available apparently - https://www.maxsun.com/products/intel-arc-pro-b60-dual-48g-turbo

Am I dumb or has AMD not released anything close to competing with the 5090 yet?
AMD does have a 32GB card out now if you want the vram. The AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700 may be available in your neck of the woods. It is in Australia.
 

Stg-Flame

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2007
3,683
631
126
AMD does have a 32GB card out now if you want the vram. The AMD Radeon AI Pro R9700 may be available in your neck of the woods. It is in Australia
Not my neck of the woods. And it was more along the lines of curiosity after looking at the market. It struck me as odd that AMD was pushing out decently-priced cards while Nvidia is still hoping people will take out a second mortgage just to upgrade their PC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marees

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,032
32,501
146
but the RX 9070 XT feels like a downgrade to my overclocked 3090 Ti. Not to mention, the 3090 was released almost four years ago and according to benchmarking sites, it still outperforms AMD's newest card.
Bull💩. 9070XT is significantly faster than a 3090ti. Not a worthwhile upgrade though, I'd wait another generation and see what all 3 vendors have. DLSS transformer should be enough to keep a 3090tie in the mix until then.
 

Stg-Flame

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2007
3,683
631
126

dlerious

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2004
2,118
932
136

I never claimed to be a hardware guru and according to this benchmarking site, it underperforms compared to a 3090 Ti. I'm also not going to spend the money to test all of this myself so I use these sites to get a general idea about comparisons when it's coming time for me to start making upgrades.
Here's Techpowerup with the 9070XT about 10% faster.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,032
32,501
146
TPU relative performance chart is fake news for older vs new. Here we have a 3090 tested with the same CPU as the 9070XT -

Screenshot 2025-10-10 080438.png
Screenshot 2025-10-10 134744.png

Just an example of how geomean obfuscates performance in any particular title.