• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AR-15's back in stock...big time

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
This. To me, a well regulated militia is the national guard. A bunch of regular citizens who take some time out of their lives to train and work within an organization. Joe schmoe holding a six pack of bud and a 12 gauge on his jonboat doesn't quite cut it.

I've always been tempted to join the national guard. Its too bad their duties are so expansive to include overseas deployment. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but otherwise, I'd be interested in joining an organization that is purely defensive on continental domestic soil.
 
I've always been tempted to join the national guard. Its too bad their duties are so expansive to include overseas deployment. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but otherwise, I'd be interested in joining an organization that is purely defensive on continental domestic soil.

You're not wrong. If you're in the National Guard the military owns your ass and you can be shipped out for no valid reason other than someone wants you to go. I agree with you, the Guard would probably have a lot more recruiting success if it was disentangled from the conventional military and limited to domestic protection roles only.
 
civilians shouldn't be allowed to own guns. actually im not sure where in the constitution it says they are allowed to but i digress. i have been to jail 3 times for possessing a dried plant... but if i would just stockpile a small army of munitions thats totally OK because those cant hurt anyone else.. its not like the entire purpose of guns is to kill or anything... but that dried flower stuff- that effects EVERYONE around you, putting their lives in danger!

#sickofstupidity

Are you lighting up in front of the police station or something? I don't see how that is possible, though I would probably be sickofstupidity, too, in that situation.

Constitution, look it up.

wirednuts, you're not making a good case that smoking weed is harmless. I'd classify you as a possible example that it causes brain damage.
 
LMAO, The typical twitter user/gen y is right here folks. Ignorant of everything, yet focused on debauchery. Kudos.

I still think ARs are pussy guns, step up to something that is above a .22 folks! And before anyone whines that "Blitz Blitz, ARs can have the caliber change by just switching the buffer/bolt/upper" yes, I know that. The gun was originally designed around/best known for selling the .223/5.56mm caliber.

.30+ or Die :biggrin:

Actually the AR was originally meant to be .308.

It was adapted to .223 at the request of the military for the small caliber high velocity rifle trials and went on to become the AR15, but the AR10 came first.
 
Actually the AR was originally meant to be .308.

It was adapted to .223 at the request of the military for the small caliber high velocity rifle trials and went on to become the AR15, but the AR10 came first.

Yes, that I know but the AR I was referring to is the AR that is the most popular here in the US, the AR15.

The AR10 is not as popular or prolific.

When people say "I want to get an AR!" they usually are thinking about/defaulting to the AR15 in 5.56/.223.
 
This. To me, a well regulated militia is the national guard. A bunch of regular citizens who take some time out of their lives to train and work within an organization. Joe schmoe holding a six pack of bud and a 12 gauge on his jonboat doesn't quite cut it.

"Well regulated" in the context of the second amendment means "properly functioning". As in a well regulated clock or a well regulated digestive system. It doesn't mean bound by a whole bunch of rules and regulations.
 
"Well regulated" in the context of the second amendment means "properly functioning". As in a well regulated clock or a well regulated digestive system. It doesn't mean bound by a whole bunch of rules and regulations.
Maybe that's what the law says now, based on the court's interpretations, but you see the words you used there? Regulated means regulations. Notice how they're different forms of the same word? How "regulated" is a verb and "regulations" is a noun? So yes, contrary to your point, "well regulated" means exactly that, bound by regulations.
 
Maybe that's what the law says now, based on the court's interpretations, but you see the words you used there? Regulated means regulations. Notice how they're different forms of the same word? How "regulated" is a verb and "regulations" is a noun? So yes, contrary to your point, "well regulated" means exactly that, bound by regulations.

Negative. And I knew what I what I was doing. You can't deny that the court's interpretation of the phrase is perfectly in line with accepted usage both now and when the constitution was written. They didn't make it up. You just don't like the end result.
 
Why is this even in discussion. The reason for the 2nd is simple. The Brits/Gen. Gage tried to round up weapons so the civilians couldn't fight back. The framers wanted to "ensure" it wouldn't happen again.
 
Negative. And I knew what I what I was doing. You can't deny that the court's interpretation of the phrase is perfectly in line with accepted usage both now and when the constitution was written. They didn't make it up. You just don't like the end result.
Wrong again, and this will be my last post on the subject, because I don't feel like getting involved in a useless semantic argument. But based on your post, a simple search of the phrase yields this site:
http://constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm
Which pretty much states your implications. I would argue that it also backs up mine. All the the quotes from the above link indicate following commonly accepted rules or regulations. A clock is only "well regulated" if its keeps accurate time, i.e. it is able to accurately and precisely dictate the intervals of time, in seconds, minutes, and hours. A person with a "well-regulated mind" presumably is able to follow the rules that dictate common sense and logic. All of these examples represent something "well regulated" as faithfully following pre-ordained rules, customs and regulations.

A bunch of guys sitting around on a back porch doesn't qualify under those definitions. They're in fact the definition of unregulated. Nor are they part of a militia. A militia is an organization with a command structure.

Now, as to why you're wrong on both counts, I actually don't like the way it's written because I think it denies access to weapons for the general public, which I don't believe in. I believe every human should have the right to self defense. I currently don't own any guns, but I would like to at some point in the future.

I just hate faulty logic.
 
Regulate this fucktards:

OV020v3a03c1JlcaaVszaDowThWk1Ta1IFg5Wa8mh6o
 
Now, as to why you're wrong on both counts, I actually don't like the way it's written because I think it denies access to weapons for the general public, which I don't believe in. I believe every human should have the right to self defense. I currently don't own any guns, but I would like to at some point in the future.

I don't understand why you're getting worked up about it. The Supreme Court has already ruled against the interpretation that you're against, yet insist is the correct one. You should be happy.

I just hate faulty logic.

We agree on this.
 
Love dem penetrators.

Not sure why they are called penetrators. Its a mild steel tip for the purpose of shifting the center of mass of the projectile for stabilization and long range accuracy purposes. Doesn't really have any penetration capability over that of any high velocity rifle cartridge.
 
Why is this even in discussion. The reason for the 2nd is simple. The Brits/Gen. Gage tried to round up weapons so the civilians couldn't fight back. The framers wanted to "ensure" it wouldn't happen again.

not only that, but the founders recognized the dangers of a standing military, but also the need to maintain an institution that can provide for the common defense.

the militia was a grand idea, but too bad we shit on the graves of the founders and now bow at the mighty pedestal of the Pentagon. :\
 
The Supreme Court has already ruled against the interpretation that you're against, yet insist is the correct one.
56% of the supreme court ruled on that interpretation.
It is still a huge debate and always will be.

I am personally glad they ruled the way they did, but I personally believe "well regulated militia" means an organized military group, separate from the state.
 
not only that, but the founders recognized the dangers of a standing military, but also the need to maintain an institution that can provide for the common defense.

the militia was a grand idea, but too bad we shit on the graves of the founders and now bow at the mighty pedestal of the Pentagon. :\
Why do you hate America?:colbert:


😛
Dave has been MIA so I figured I'd take up his slack.
 
The biggest LGS in my area just posted at least 6 ARs that arrived today alone, and prices are slowly heading down.

Handgun prices dropped almost immediately. I'm seeing those going for pre-panic prices already.

ARs, on the other hand, are going for ~MSRP, which is NOT pre-panic pricing. For example, MSRP on an M&P15 Sport is $839, but it was going for $699 max all day long back in October 2012 (you could even snag them for $649 or less at gun shows).

So right now, MSRP is the "new normal" on ARs.
 
I still think ARs are pussy guns, step up to something that is above a .22 folks!
Unfortunately for your opinion, we have several decades of science and real-world hard military use promoting the combat effectiveness of smaller caliber rifles.

.30+ calibers have their purpose. If you want to reach out and touch someone at a distance, that is a caliber of choice. But the science is pretty sound. You can give an average person a heavy battle rifle (like an FAL...I've got a couple of those myself) or an AR-15, and they'll put more rounds on target faster at short-medium distances (0-200m) with the AR. Same applies for an AK-47 vs. AK-74; the 74 allows you to put more rounds on target faster (and more accurately) than the 47, and it still does quite a lot of damage to soft targets.
 
Shelves here in CT are still much more bare than they were 5 months ago. Two LGS used to have display cases jammed full of pistols, and now they've resorted to filling half their cases with scopes, holsters, and other nonsense.

Ammo is slowly starting to become less scarce, and the prices are slowly going back down.

I still can't believe one of the local shops had an M&P shield on display... and six in the back. 😱 They've been like hen's teeth here since they came out. I think every single one was purchase while we were there, including the one I took home. 🙂

About the only positive that has come out of this for gun owners is that a lot of older and sometimes rare guns are (were) getting traded in. For a while I was seeing Remington 660s, Winchester Model 100s, some obscure European / Asian stuff, a lot of old military rifles, etc. I managed to grab an M1917 in nice shape that someone sporterized for $160. Not a jaw-dropping deal, but not bad for a decent .30-06.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately for your opinion, we have several decades of science and real-world hard military use promoting the combat effectiveness of smaller caliber rifles.

.30+ calibers have their purpose. If you want to reach out and touch someone at a distance, that is a caliber of choice. But the science is pretty sound. You can give an average person a heavy battle rifle (like an FAL...I've got a couple of those myself) or an AR-15, and they'll put more rounds on target faster at short-medium distances (0-200m) with the AR. Same applies for an AK-47 vs. AK-74; the 74 allows you to put more rounds on target faster (and more accurately) than the 47, and it still does quite a lot of damage to soft targets.
And ammo weight. People forget that. Ammo weight is a big deal.
 
thats why they put the term "well regulated" in there. a well regulated militia is an army.

At the time it was written 'well regulated' meant practiced, or trained, or properly functioning. In other words, since people are the militia and they have to all know how to use weapons, we'll never tell you you can't have and practice with them.

The 'militia' was every able bodied man of age. In today's terms, to avoid discrimination, it would be every citizen over 18.

This has been well covered in numerous academic and legal accounts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top