Schrodinger
Golden Member
- Nov 4, 2004
- 1,274
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Eug
Probably because:Originally posted by: trikster2
You have to wonder why Apple did not put an iPOD dock in the thing. Also if they made a simple mythTV style interface for ripping/playing they could do a good job of pushing the iPod into the masses that still can't figure out how to use a puter.....
1) Cost
2) Size
3) There are a bazillion different iPod form factors now.
4) They make money off docks.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: timswim78
I am looking forward to seeing Windows knock-offs of this. It would be sweet to have Windows machine of that size.
I am not knocking MAC's. I just prefer Windows.
http://www.mini-itx.com
NanoITX pwnz that Big Fat Oversized Mac.
- M4H
Originally posted by: Thin Lizzy
Thats awesome. Now I regret buying my 1GHz eMac for 700 bucks back in April of 2004!!!!!
Anyways, I was also looking at that iPod shuffle. Its kind of ugly. But you have to read this!!! Its hilarious!!!!
1: Music capacity is based on 4 minutes per song and 128Kbps AAC encoding.
2: Do not eat iPod shuffle.
What in the hell???
Originally posted by: Amol
oh lol, its because they put it next to the trident gum
![]()
Except you don't need a dock at all. You can just plug in the USB 2 or Firewire cable. A dock is just a bonus.Originally posted by: trikster2
mini, 3g and 4g all have the same connector. Just need some sort of spring loaded adjustable base.
Size... you are right that thing is tight as it is. Almost looks modular though. Could imagine an ipod dock that "matches"
Cost. For a connector and an indent? Ok +30 dollars to tie this into the #1 selling apple product, seems like it would be worth it.
4. Aye they do make money off the docks. Probably why they keep on changing thime. But $35 (or whatever) for a dock should be nothing compared to total apple return on one "switcher".
Course now that they have the mini-mac out there it always leaves room for an "i-pod" eddition...
The Radeon 9200 would blow it out of the water no doubt.Originally posted by: trikster2
And via graphics versus ATI? Hmmm wonder which would be better?
The Radeon 9200 would blow it out of the water no doubt.[/quote]Originally posted by: trikster2
And via graphics versus ATI? Hmmm wonder which would be better?
Originally posted by: Eug
Like I said:Originally posted by: omissible
Don't ever, ever, ever buy memory from Apple.
Pick any other reputable vendor and install it yourself.
The other problem is memory. It is NOT user upgradable. You either have to pay Apple's prices for RAM, or else pay a technician to install it. It might be a good idea to wait for third party resellers to offer their free memory or cheap memory deals with this. If you install it yourself, you void the warranty.
MacMall will probably within a couple of weeks be offering to double your memory for free (after mail in rebate of course) if you buy one from them instead of the Apple store.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: timswim78
I am looking forward to seeing Windows knock-offs of this. It would be sweet to have Windows machine of that size.
I am not knocking MAC's. I just prefer Windows.
http://www.mini-itx.com
NanoITX pwnz that Big Fat Oversized Mac.
- M4H
Given the Northwood Celerons on 845 chipsets (not D, E, or PE!) out there, I'd not consider a toaster too badOriginally posted by: slash196
Wow, you pay 500 bucks for something with the same computing power as the average toaster.
Hey, it could have been a 9200SE w/o DVI...Originally posted by: icejunkie
"Mac mini sports a full-fledged ATI Radeon 9200 with 32MB dedicated DDR SDRAM over an AGP 4x bus."
OMG!!!
