Originally posted by: jim1976
Ok I think we are on a vicious circle here
I just don't see the point of having a 850w psu if excess ripple might exist at high loads.. But that's just me..
And I can't show you nothing else about 850w.. Is it better than the 700w? Who knows? Given the history the same series of psu's have the same problems.. But of course I can be wrong here.. I hope I am.. I have nothing against OCZ.. And JG said that if FSP and OCZ could get together and fix the ripple issue then we would talk about a "benchmark psu".. I don't think he's biased against them either..
Most of all I don't think your psu is unreliable..Not even close.. I do believe that you won't even need anything remotely close to that load.. I just argue your perspective.. That's all..
you hit the nail on the head ... the *difference* between us
:thumbsup:
however, it isn't "vicious"
it's a matter of *maybes* ... you won't "take a chance" for saving $50 ...
i will
it's a matter of best 'bang-for-buck' for *my* next rig ...
in my opinion ... a *solid 8* from JG is good enough for me - considering the 850w is supposedly "improved" over the older 700 he tested.
it is "later" than the 700w PS and why would they NOT improve it? ... they are aware of the *ripple* in JG's review and OCZ seems like a company that works to improve its products ... over it's short history ... i like 'em and i want to give it a chance
small risk
tiny
almost non-existent with a 3 year exchange warranty ...
OK?
IF i am wrong ... then i will let you know you were right ... i promise
... and i will accept the consequences ... just like i did with my x1950p