Anybody agree that Saddam can be trusted more than Bush?

[Xionide]

Originally posted by: Spoooon
Well, when Saddam tells a lie, it's in his own best interest. When Bush tells a lie, it is in, what he thinks, is the best interest of the country. I feel safer having Bush tell the lies.

Bush thinks?

 

[Xionide]

I LOVE bush. bit i HATE bush

 

[Xionide]

very nice sadam, you shouldnt be here on AT.

 

[Xionide]

if the president didnt tell lies we would never be a powerfull country

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: SherEPunjab

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Flypaper catches anything that flys, I guess.

Sher, read the thread. We are all loones:

Saddaam is a crazy mofo that deserves to be hung upside down from his testicles while acid is sprayed up his nose with a pressure washer. As much as i think Bush is an idiot, hypocrite, and opportunist, I would not put them in the same camp, not even close.
----------------
Well I sort of agree with the difference that I would like to see him brought before the Haag for crimes against humanity. I don't want to try to out do him.

Moonbeam: I'm not looney. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I honestly believe violence is justified in certain cases. With a man who has committed those kind of atrocities, he deserves to feel pain and suffer. He deserves to be punished, and a quick release from this life is not fair (gunshot to head, lethal injection, etc.). He needs to feel pain, anything less, and that would be a miscarriage of justice, and an insult to the memory of those he has killed. This thinking is not looney because looney thinking is characterized by illogic, while my thinking is clear and logical.

agreed

 

[Stark]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Stark:

When you choose to support a dictator... a sworn enemy to your country... over your own President, you are both unpatriotic and unamerican.

(Yoy are an ignorant putz, Stark. I mentioned two or three times in this thread that I was not supporting Saddam over Bush, and I have said a hundred times I trust this countyry over others. I made a joke out of the fact that you can count on Saddam lying but never know for sure when Bush is. Maybe you have no personal pride and don't care who you vilify out of your own stupidity and lazy inability to read a thread but it's pretty sad. Go Fc*K yourself.

Moonbeam is a sniveling little liberal piece of crap. (You 're the one sniveling ) He states he trusts Saddam more than Bush... if that truly is the case, (which is isn't and you would know if you read) then he needs to turn in his social security card, move to northern Iraq, and hang with the Kurds for a while. His liberal bias has finally completely blinded him to any sense of reality. Maybe a vacation in Saddam's back yard can restore it.(Having fun on the lunitic fringe?)

Garafalo was on Jimmy Kimmel last night and she was an anti-war liberal who at least made sense... one who wants Saddam out but wants to force him out through means other than war. (Hey what do you know, me too) For liberals like Moonbeam who willingly support an evil man (Saddam) (You lie, I never Supported Saddam)over their elected leader (Bush) because of their blind adhearance to liberal causes, they have stopped being rational, (You would have st start being rational before you could stop)patriotic Americans and have become no better than Nazis. IMHO, moonbeam is the moral equivalent to a modern day nazi... ((In my opinion you are a simpleton)someone who turns a blind eye to real evil to advance their political beliefs(That is exactly what you did here. You turned a complete blind eye to my real position and went on an ignorant stupid childish, uninformed inane rant), . He has lost his right to call himself American. (You don't deserve to call yourself one) You are the kind of vacant minded reactionary that burn witches. 😀

Nice backpeddle, loonbeam. "I don't really trust saddam more than bush, I was just trying to be thought provoking."

Sad thing is, you may not really hate the US, but there are plenty among your anti-war bretheren who sincerly do. To them, we are the bad guys and Saddam is somehow the good guy. We were to blame for 9/11, not Osama or Islamic terrorists. We deserve terrorism because we are terrorists... these are the beliefs of the unamerican and unpatriotic. When you spout off in threads like them, you enlist in their ranks.

 

[Moonbeam]

StarkNice backpeddle, loonbeam. "I don't really trust saddam more than bush, I was just trying to be thought provoking."

Sad thing is, you may not really hate the US, but there are plenty among your anti-war bretheren who sincerly do. To them, we are the bad guys and Saddam is somehow the good guy. We were to blame for 9/11, not Osama or Islamic terrorists. We deserve terrorism because we are terrorists... these are the beliefs of the unamerican and unpatriotic. When you spout off in threads like them, you enlist in their ranks.
------------------
The only backpeddling here, Stork, is all you own. You jumped in an empty pool thinking you'd make a big splash. I not only don't hate my country I love it alot more than you do. You and your brainless pro war allies are the real enemy in the world, You are the Brown-shirt, Bootjack idiots for whom country right or wrong is an anthem. You will follow any cause, commit any crime as long as you can wrap yourself in your flag. You bundle yourselves up in vulture flocks and jackal packs and peck and snap at any thing you find.

Me and my brainless anti war allies are not anti war for the same reasons just as those pro war are not all braindead patriputzs like you. There are valid and sound reasons on both sides and plenty of moronic ones too. It's just as important to expose the latter so that we can see the underlying hate that is common to both camps of idiots. The think you hate is what you are.

 

[SherEPunjab]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Moonbeam: I'm not looney. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I honestly believe violence is justified in certain cases. With a man who has committed those kind of atrocities, he deserves to feel pain and suffer. He deserves to be punished, and a quick release from this life is not fair (gunshot to head, lethal injection, etc.). He needs to feel pain, anything less, and that would be a miscarriage of justice, and an insult to the memory of those he has killed. This thinking is not looney because looney thinking is characterized by illogic, while my thinking is clear and logical.
---------------------
My dear sir, you think just like Saddam, clear and logical. I know, we can throw him in a tank of water and see how long it takes to drown. Your words make me very sad. You must have been hated horribly and experienced enormous fear. All that matters is that Saddam is stopped in a way that prevents his harming anyone again.

How does Saddam think clear and logically? He has ethnically cleansed kurds and non-kurds alike. He lives in a billion dollar mansion while his citizens are starving on the street. Is this logic?

 

[Moonbeam]

Sher, I don't think I want to debate somebody who's idea of justice is that evil should be rewarded with greater evil. I don't want to drive you deeper into fanaticism. You are far enough in already. Your position makes me very sad. It's what, in popular parlance might be called 'going over to the dark side'. It means that evil wins, that human decency, kindness and joy are defeated. I hope that whatever tore such a hole in your heart can be surmounted and you can heal.