desiplaya4life
Golden Member
- Jan 25, 2004
- 1,449
- 2
- 81
if u are so concerned with driving during snow and cant afford a beater, an AWD is the best option. m3 also need lots of maintainance and expensive repair.
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Just trying to be helpful! :wine:![]()
Its really not that helpful though as the typical M3 buyer would never consider a WRX, I myself am not a typical M3 buyer but also wouldn't consider the WRX and instead would much rather opt for an Audi Quattro or even gasp an Infinity or Lexus (<--hates japanese cars)...Subaru WRX is a nice budget car but IMHO not to be compared with a BMW, Lexus, Merc, Audi or Infinity.
Originally posted by: noxipoo
This is a used M3, so yes i can't afford another car. a new STI would be 2x the cost of the M3s i'm looking at. Sounds like i'll be ok with winter tires. I don't drive like an idiot, especially when theres snow out. I'll look more into the cost of actually owning this car.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I sold our troublesome '94 E36 almost a year ago with 120k miles on it. That thing cost us $2-3k a year in repairs easy for the past 4 years and nothing major every went wrong. Struts/shocks replaced cost us $1300. Brakes were $300-400 every year. Those cars nickle and dime you to death in repairs.
So go buy a Camry.................be practical and forget about all the dreams you have....ya rightOriginally posted by: Achtung
I've seen several M3's fishtailing in the snow. If I lived in Florida or Cali, I'd consider it. But out here in Chicagoland it just seems like another sports car you can't use 4 months out of the year.
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I sold our troublesome '94 E36 almost a year ago with 120k miles on it. That thing cost us $2-3k a year in repairs easy for the past 4 years and nothing major every went wrong. Struts/shocks replaced cost us $1300. Brakes were $300-400 every year. Those cars nickle and dime you to death in repairs.
I was typing a reply to you JulesMaximus when my son fell and smashed his head. I had to take him to the hospital but all is ok now.
Forgot what I was writing though.
Originally posted by: abc
1300 for struts shocks, did you take your repairs to the bmw dealer or an independent shop?
i'm thinking about getting a 2001-2003 330 coupe used, around 40-60k miles...
are bmw's out of warranty really that costly to own?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I sold our troublesome '94 E36 almost a year ago with 120k miles on it. That thing cost us $2-3k a year in repairs easy for the past 4 years and nothing major every went wrong. Struts/shocks replaced cost us $1300. Brakes were $300-400 every year. Those cars nickle and dime you to death in repairs.
I was typing a reply to you JulesMaximus when my son fell and smashed his head. I had to take him to the hospital but all is ok now.
Forgot what I was writing though.
Ouch! I hope he's okay? How old is your son?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That's your opinion though. For performance the STi compares very well with the waaay more expensive E46 M3. Interior isn't nearly as nice and it isn't as refined but it costs half as much.
Edit-I've owned 2 BMWs and I've driven a friend's M3 quite a bit. Nice cars but I don't want to own another German money pit. I'll stick with the more reliable, less expensive Japanese cars.
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That's your opinion though. For performance the STi compares very well with the waaay more expensive E46 M3. Interior isn't nearly as nice and it isn't as refined but it costs half as much.
Edit-I've owned 2 BMWs and I've driven a friend's M3 quite a bit. Nice cars but I don't want to own another German money pit. I'll stick with the more reliable, less expensive Japanese cars.
not so much an opinion but rather a fact supported by market data, typical luxury car buyers do not consider Subaru when looking at options and last I checked BMW especially the M3 is considered a luxury car...so while you might prefer the lower expense and the reliability of the Subaru, 99.9999% of people looking to buy a luxury car will not even give Subaru a second thought....I know I wouldn't even consider one.
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: jagec
I don't know about the M3, but my '84 325e was actually pretty good in the snow IF you put weight in the back. It would climb hills like nothing else.
Sideways?
My 95 325i can't even make it up the hump to my driveway from a standstill. It needs a push unless it comes in with some speed.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That's your opinion though. For performance the STi compares very well with the waaay more expensive E46 M3. Interior isn't nearly as nice and it isn't as refined but it costs half as much.
Edit-I've owned 2 BMWs and I've driven a friend's M3 quite a bit. Nice cars but I don't want to own another German money pit. I'll stick with the more reliable, less expensive Japanese cars.
not so much an opinion but rather a fact supported by market data, typical luxury car buyers do not consider Subaru when looking at options and last I checked BMW especially the M3 is considered a luxury car...so while you might prefer the lower expense and the reliability of the Subaru, 99.9999% of people looking to buy a luxury car will not even give Subaru a second thought....I know I wouldn't even consider one.
You are so full of crap. The OP is clearly not in the market for a new M3. A used M3 is not much of a bargain so I think someone who is interested in that car WOULD consider the much much faster STi. Don't be so quick to discount it as a serious sports car. I wouldn't consider it if I were in the market for a new M3 but a used one? Give me a fvcking break. :roll:
A used M3 isn't much of a luxury if you ask me. Dumbass...
Originally posted by: Nebor
I would consider a used M3 long long before I would consider a Subaru. Cars say something about their drivers. A Subaru says, "I did a lot of research and picked an economical, reliable, decent performing car." A BMW says, "I'm better than you."
BMW wins. It's an Ultimate Driving Machine.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Nebor
I would consider a used M3 long long before I would consider a Subaru. Cars say something about their drivers. A Subaru says, "I did a lot of research and picked an economical, reliable, decent performing car." A BMW says, "I'm better than you."
BMW wins. It's an Ultimate Driving Machine.
Well, you clearly haven't done any research on the latest Subaru's. Your loss.
A used 3-series is no bargain and barely a luxury car.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Nebor
I would consider a used M3 long long before I would consider a Subaru. Cars say something about their drivers. A Subaru says, "I did a lot of research and picked an economical, reliable, decent performing car." A BMW says, "I'm better than you."
BMW wins. It's an Ultimate Driving Machine.
Well, you clearly haven't done any research on the latest Subaru's. Your loss.
A used 3-series is no bargain and barely a luxury car.
Originally posted by: noxipoo
Any M3 owners out there that drives it as an everyday car? I want to buy an used one but I don't know if I can use it as an everyday car. I live in chicago so the I'll need to use it the winter. 60 miles communte everyday.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That's your opinion though. For performance the STi compares very well with the waaay more expensive E46 M3. Interior isn't nearly as nice and it isn't as refined but it costs half as much.
Edit-I've owned 2 BMWs and I've driven a friend's M3 quite a bit. Nice cars but I don't want to own another German money pit. I'll stick with the more reliable, less expensive Japanese cars.
not so much an opinion but rather a fact supported by market data, typical luxury car buyers do not consider Subaru when looking at options and last I checked BMW especially the M3 is considered a luxury car...so while you might prefer the lower expense and the reliability of the Subaru, 99.9999% of people looking to buy a luxury car will not even give Subaru a second thought....I know I wouldn't even consider one.
You are so full of crap. The OP is clearly not in the market for a new M3. A used M3 is not much of a bargain so I think someone who is interested in that car WOULD consider the much much faster STi. Don't be so quick to discount it as a serious sports car. I wouldn't consider it if I were in the market for a new M3 but a used one? Give me a fvcking break. :roll:
A used M3 isn't much of a luxury if you ask me. Dumbass...
I would consider a used M3 long long before I would consider a Subaru. Cars say something about their drivers. A Subaru says, "I did a lot of research and picked an economical, reliable, decent performing car." A BMW says, "I'm better than you."
BMW wins. It's an Ultimate Driving Machine.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That's your opinion though. For performance the STi compares very well with the waaay more expensive E46 M3. Interior isn't nearly as nice and it isn't as refined but it costs half as much.
Edit-I've owned 2 BMWs and I've driven a friend's M3 quite a bit. Nice cars but I don't want to own another German money pit. I'll stick with the more reliable, less expensive Japanese cars.
not so much an opinion but rather a fact supported by market data, typical luxury car buyers do not consider Subaru when looking at options and last I checked BMW especially the M3 is considered a luxury car...so while you might prefer the lower expense and the reliability of the Subaru, 99.9999% of people looking to buy a luxury car will not even give Subaru a second thought....I know I wouldn't even consider one.
You are so full of crap. The OP is clearly not in the market for a new M3. A used M3 is not much of a bargain so I think someone who is interested in that car WOULD consider the much much faster STi. Don't be so quick to discount it as a serious sports car. I wouldn't consider it if I were in the market for a new M3 but a used one? Give me a fvcking break. :roll:
A used M3 isn't much of a luxury if you ask me. Dumbass...
I would consider a used M3 long long before I would consider a Subaru. Cars say something about their drivers. A Subaru says, "I did a lot of research and picked an economical, reliable, decent performing car." A BMW says, "I'm better than you."
BMW wins. It's an Ultimate Driving Machine.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Because I can't drive a stick well at all, and I don't really care to.
Lightning Owner (only autos)