- Jan 12, 2005
- 17,305
- 1,002
- 126
Here's the trouble with your viewpoint. You seem to be under the belief that fascism, white supremacy, or whatever other evil shit mankind comes up with as an excuse to kill each other rises through violence. It doesn't, it rises through long term, sometimes multi-decade slides into acceptability through a continued campaign with the intent to change the groupthink of large percentages of a population, until the idea of doing something horrible seems not-so-horrible. A perfect example is the treatment of immigrants, both legal and illegal in current US society. It's become normalized to demonize them, see them as heinous rapists, job-stealers, lazy, or otherwise ne'er-do-wells which should be punished somehow, doesn't really matter how. As a result, we've had literal children put in cages and while may people care, many others are in favor of even further action, further punishment, further marginalization.
Note, it does not matter who started this, who's team is the big baddy, etc etc. Those are all just distractions. As it is with other products of fascism and supremacists, you glom on a bunch of distractions and points of contentions to at minimum delay how long it is until your shit gets shut down, and ideally to grow your power base enough that you can begin your true work, which is the elimination of those you're trying to marginalize. By the time that day comes, it isn't greeted with gasps of horror, it's greeted with cheers from the 51% of people who think you're in the right.
So as of right now, you're part of the group already cheering, or at least not jeering, the group that's attempting to marginalize a group or groups of people. The people fighting back against that are not fascists, they're fighting back against an enemy of the people. You're on the wrong side of history on this, and history doesn't forget.
No, I don't think the way to solve it is through violence, certainly not causing physical harm to someone just because of their viewpoints, no matter how far gone that viewpoint seems. Do you think someone is going to come around after being physically attacked for having whatever view and being peaceful with it (assuming we are talking about peaceful people not creating violence themselves). Also, you lose all credibility as soon as you go to the faux "children in cages" bs. Can any of you have a discussion without the melodramatic exaggerations being forced into the conversation? I have little doubt that a considerable number of people that have crossed our border illegally are in fact criminals. I'm sure many are decent people that just want a better life too. I see nothing wrong with wanting to vet whom it is we allow in and do our best at accepting those that just want to bring a piece of their culture to our melting pot and have a chance at a better life and filtering out the undesirable criminals. I don't think that is some kind of racist Hitler move, as the left tries so hard to make it out to be.
The left is inventing this "fascism" to be afraid of. This is just the everybody gets a trophy indoctrinated PC crowd not being able to handle Trump winning in 2016. You were programmed to receive Hillary, they all kept telling you Hillary in a landslide, madam president, etc. etc. And here we are several years later and you're still trying to recover from the BSOD you ran into that night when reality didn't line up with what they sold you. So now the left tries to shape reality into what protects their emotional bubble. You are actively arguing it is ok to harm those that you see as having extreme views even if they are being peaceful. Well, we'll get what we deserve.


