Our mod Idon'tcare's name is being called as 'proof' that there are AMD shills.What do you say to that,Mr Mod?
I read through Apoppin's ABT thread, it is an interesting read that is clearly an intentional work in progress and is evolving in time.
It is interesting that he reference's some guy named "David Makin", aka "Ir0x0r", aka "palit".
I say interesting because we had two members here (no activity for many years now) which any registered member can search to find that fit Apoppin's description:
About
ir0x0r
forename David
surname Makin
and
About
PalitGuy
forename David
surname Makin
As for me being proof that their are shills, you already know where I stand on that. I disagree over the implied or working definition of the word "shill".
Some folks take a very liberal interpretation of the word as meaning anyone that has received compensation of any kind (including free or discounted hardware) and posts in the forum.
Such a broadly defined working definition is ludicrous in my estimation as it would apply to folks who benefit from
this, or
this, or
this.
Every one of those links has people receiving free hardware, and if any one them post in this forum then some folks would have them be labeled as shills, a definition that I totally disagree with.
And in response to that obvious fallacy you will see some people start to make caveats "well, of course hardware reviewers aren't shills, but everyone else is".
My point is that it never ends, its all finger-pointing and blanket accusations. Guilty till proven innocent crap that just has no place here in this community.
To me a shill is an individual that is compensated to go and sway public opinion while feigning to not be associated with the business entity they are compensated by.
But the key distinction the intent. The Nvidia Focus Group does not compensate its members with free hardware for their involvement in tech forums, so far as I am aware the focus group members are compensated with free hardware so they can review it and provide their feedback (much like beta testers and so on) to the company that is sourcing that hardware.
It is really of no surprise that someone who is enthusiastic enough to want to test hardware and provide feedback would also be the sort of individual who is enthusiastic enough to spend time on forum boards. One does not cause the other, they are part and parcel to the individual's personality without external influence.
If the NV Focus Group had a charter, even an unwritten one on the sly, that was engineered to manipulate forum communities by way of compensating individuals with hardware with the expectation that that individual would then post in favor of Nvidia because of the free hardware carrot then I would have an issue with it as shilling. But that is simply not what the Nvidia Focus Group is about.
Its not what Lan parties are about, it is not what free swag at CES use to be about, it is not what reviewer relations are about, it is not what this forum is about.
People get free hardware all the time, free hardware is not what makes a shill. A shill is someone who's actions are intimately tied to the receipt of that hardware and/or compensation of any sort.
Hardware reviewers like our own Ryan Smith is not a shill not because he is a hardware reviewer and that somehow bestows upon him a mystical immunity idol; rather, Ryan Smith is not a shill because we all know that his motivations for posting what he posts in this very forum have no relation to the likelihood that the computer he is posting from contains a fee video card under the hood.
I feel the same way about Keysplayr, and every other member of this community that has received free or reduced price hardware. Just look at our CPU forum, we have employees of Intel who get reduced price CPU's as employee discount programs. Are they shills for Intel just because they get subsidized prices on their Intel gear? No! Don't be absurd.
They are not posting here in these forums because of that compensation, but it is no coincidence that someone who is enthusiastic enough about hardware as to seek out ways to get some (employee discounts, give-a-ways, organized lan parties, hardware reviews, focus group members) also tend to turn out to be enthusiastic about talking about hardware and so they end up being members of technical forums across the web.
There needs to be some sanity injected into the discussion. Not bury your heads on either side of the argument and take extremes "it is rampant" or "it doesn't exist", but actual common sense discussion on the topic.
Apoppin's efforts to uncover shills in the past have proven productive. Rollo was outed because of it before, looks like there was another one on the AMD side of the fence around the same timeframe but he too has since moved on.
We can never say it is not happening, but at the same time there needs to be some common sense applied to what it is that is actually being discussed here. IMO the term shill is over-used and over-extended. I've said this on numerous occasions. People can be reasonable about this, or unreasonable.
At the end of the day I personally think this is all much ado about nothing. It is fans getting passionate about something because that is what fans do, they get fanatical about stuff. And in the absence of something productive to be fanatical over they will find inconsequential stuff to get fanatical about.
I realize that by my stating the obvious here that it will resonate with the portion of the crowd that is the reasonable crowd and because they are reasonable individuals they aren't inclined to weigh in on such unreasonable topics as this. As such I fully expect to be unreasonably flamed for having dared to post such a middle-ground position in an otherwise polarized battlefield.
10 impassioned people on the extreme left, 10 impassioned people on the extreme right, and about 80 people near the middle who just don't give a f'ck and aren't about to post in this thread because they don't. (I wouldn't, except I got specifically called out and felt compelled to attempt to defend my integrity, knowing in advance that all attempts will fail from time-zero anyways

)