[AMD] World's First Shipping FreeSync-Enabled Displays (CES)

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

tolis626

Senior member
Aug 25, 2013
399
0
76
You are right.

I have 3 x panels in eyefinity. While the IPS show better colors, the TN panel in the middle is faster. I see a slight lag between the image in the middle than the one on the side.

TN is indeed faster. It is not very obvious but I still notice it since I'm really picky for all the details and for perfection.

And one can always trust you (And Adam most of the time) to throw enough money to find a solution. :p

But really, that's what I intend to do. Buy a good 4K IPS monitor in the 27-32" range and use it for general stuff like browsing and watching movies and for single-player games where the better image quality will offer a superior experience. Then, I want to buy a fast TN panel (Maybe even a cheap-ish 1080p 144Hz one) just for playing FPS competitively. I'm used to running 2 monitors (Never liked the idea of more) and this seems like the best solution for me, if money isn't an issue. But alas, money is the issue currently and I won't be buying a monitor for quite a while...
 

TeleBee

Junior Member
Dec 12, 2014
9
0
0
So again, why paying for open standards is better than proprietary? The hell must frozen if I start paying for something labeled as FreeSync.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
So again, why paying for open standards is better than proprietary? The hell must frozen if I start paying for something labeled as FreeSync.

The price of that monitor is very similar to the other 4k monitors. There doesn't appear to be a premium attached to the monitor since they'd do the update free (plus shipping). This is a good sign that freesync monitors could be very competitively priced relatively to non freesync monitors. Of course monitor manufacturers could attach a premium if they want but it appears that the hardware requirements don't necessitate a premium.
 

tidy

Golden Member
Mar 24, 2012
1,519
27
91
The shipping cost is not even the most significant issue if you ask me. It's hard enough to obtain a fault-free display in the first place; after screwing around with the inevitable 3-6 RMAs to to finally get hold of a sample with no backlight bleed, dead pixels, etc, etc, am I then going to feel comfortable with the idea of relinquishing my precious monitor to be manhandled across the globe by a bunch of knuckle-walking couriers?
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
14,501
2,903
136
The shipping cost is not even the most significant issue if you ask me. It's hard enough to obtain a fault-free display in the first place; after screwing around with the inevitable 3-6 RMAs to to finally get hold of a sample with no backlight bleed, dead pixels, etc, etc, am I then going to feel comfortable with the idea of relinquishing my precious monitor to be manhandled across the globe by a bunch of knuckle-walking couriers?

such faith in humanity.
 

therealnickdanger

Senior member
Oct 26, 2005
987
2
0
The first freesync "capable" monitor is for sale at OCUK. It appears to require "something" which can be sent when freesync is released. I guess it's similar to the first gsync monitors which required a separate kit?

Sure sounds like it. FWIW, I have a VG248QE, but I can't find any G-Sync modules anywhere. While Iiyama appears to have a guarantee that they will upgrade the monitor, let's just hope that they make enough modules to satisfy demand. I recommend that interested parties just WAIT.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
such faith in humanity.

Faith in humanity? I'm still waiting for this threads title to be corrected. I have faith that it won't be.
Seriously though, Oubadah has a point. And is there any guarantee that you'll get your original monitor back or do they just grab one of the same model off the shelf ready to go for faster turn around time?
 

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
The shipping cost is not even the most significant issue if you ask me. It's hard enough to obtain a fault-free display in the first place; after screwing around with the inevitable 3-6 RMAs to to finally get hold of a sample with no backlight bleed, dead pixels, etc, etc, am I then going to feel comfortable with the idea of relinquishing my precious monitor to be manhandled across the globe by a bunch of knuckle-walking couriers?

Wow, I've never had to return a display. What models are you buying that require so many RMAs?
 

Plimogz

Senior member
Oct 3, 2009
678
0
71

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
How much do you guys figure these will retail for? Are we talking a grand or thereabouts?

That'd be my (generally uneducated) guess. Depends on flat or curved, but prob between $1k - $1500.

Whatever it is, I just want reviews!
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
How much do you guys figure these will retail for? Are we talking a grand or thereabouts?

That's about what a 34" is going for now. This monitor is supposed to be 10bit while the ones I've seen out now (non freesync) are 8bit.
 

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,786
789
136
So is it a software or hardware change that they have to do to "activate" FreeSync on this monitor?
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Ouch.

I dont hope anyone bought in to get a future Freesync upgrade.

OC.Uk also removed any Freesync references.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MO-119-IY

Small follow-up, OcUK is going to make sure anyone who purchased one while it was advertised as freesync, will get upgraded to a freesync monitor one way or another.

So it certainly seems like maybe they let a cat out of a bag, but companies may have this tech ready to go.

Really hoping CES gives us some more info/reviews.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.