LTC8K6
Lifer
- Mar 10, 2004
- 28,520
- 1,574
- 126
Disappeared quickly, have to look at the captures.link?
Disappeared quickly, have to look at the captures.link?
Now we just have to hit 88 miles per hour and ... we need a magazine ... profit!!!EDIT:
3 exact posts at the exact same time.
Yeah, doesn't seem worth the $100 extra.Hmm so 1700x hits 1547 and 1800x hits 1601. Not a huge difference. Might buy 1700x instead.
499 for top dog .. thats disruptive. Lets see how it plays out the first two weeks after launch.Cached links to 1700X and 1800X bundles - Looks like $399 for 1700X and $499 for 1800X
1700X: http://archive.is/2017.02.21-212855/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06X6N8QGB
1800X: http://archive.is/2017.02.21-212937/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B06W5Q7B38/
It might all depend on the cooling...Yeah, doesn't seem worth the $100 extra.
Not sure how amd justify $100 extra for 100mhz more. Is it the stock cooler?Yeah, doesn't seem worth the $100 extra.
The Amazon pages had a 200Mhz difference. 3.8 vs 4.0 in Precision Boost speeds.Not sure how amd justify $100 extra for 100mhz more. Is it the stock cooler?
Debbie Downer interpretation: You're lucky to get > 3.8GHz on lower binned parts, even with manual overclocking. Cough up $100 extra to have a shot at 4GHz+.Not sure how amd justify $100 extra for 100mhz more. Is it the stock cooler?
We need a new thread.Looking forward to seeing the OP updatedGreat news for everyone, right?
![]()
What if 4ghz is the max overclock on airDebbie Downer interpretation: You're lucky to get > 3.8GHz on lower binned parts, even with manual overclocking. Cough up $100 extra to have a shot at 4GHz+.
Unknown: all core turbo max?
Like reading the papers after your team wins a championshipMan it'll be such fun to read the reviews on the 28th or 3rd!
Yep, you get that extra base without having to OC and in the same thermal/voltage envelope as lower SKUs.Debbie Downer interpretation: You're lucky to get > 3.8GHz on lower binned parts, even with manual overclocking. Cough up $100 extra to have a shot at 4GHz+.
Unknown: all core turbo max?
Canard PC didn't have issues getting to 5Ghz on air single core, or are you talking about 4Ghz base OC?What if 4ghz is the max overclock on air
We don't know if that's 5 Ghz figure is stable however, and in the absence of any evidence, we should be inclined to be critical and assume this was just screenshot stable at 5 Ghz. Big difference from multiple hours prime stable or something... But yes the big question is, how much headroom does Ryzen have. To me the other question is, how much are the 1600X/1700X/1800X turboing up to with their XFR feature during these benchmarks? is 1800X actually clocking at 4.0 Ghz or is it turboing to 4.1, 4.2.... 4.3??? Because if that's the case then it's being benchmarked close to its max air OC, on AMD's "X-series" 140 TDP heatsink anyways...Canard PC didn't have issues getting to 5Ghz on air single core, or are you talking about 4Ghz base OC?
http://gamingbolt.com/skyrim-fallout-4-have-millions-of-daily-players-bethesdaSo, just terribly coded and optimized bethesda games? That's not much of a loss.
So, just terribly coded and optimized bethesda games? That's not much of a loss.Hate to be THAT guy, but don't go buying Zen until we know how it handles draw calls.
Which requires one of our users to buy a Zen CPU, pair it with an AMD GPU, and run it through that instancing demo.
'Cause if AMD still hasn't cured their draw call deficit, it's going to suck in games like Fallout and Skyrim.
Or any game making over a thousand odd draw calls in D3D9, or over a couple thousand in D3D11.So, just terribly coded and optimized bethesda games? That's not much of a loss.