lopri
Elite Member
I kind of like these. The case is sexy with clear message. Why do you plan to change the fans? The blades look like very efficient type.![]()
Kraken X61 280mm AIO (£30 cheaper than the X62, and I plan to swap the fans anyway)
![]()
I kind of like these. The case is sexy with clear message. Why do you plan to change the fans? The blades look like very efficient type.![]()
Kraken X61 280mm AIO (£30 cheaper than the X62, and I plan to swap the fans anyway)
![]()
If the discussion on the 'leaked' benchmarks in these forums is any indication, then it would be better to invest in faster RAM for Ryzen.Processor: AMD R7 1800x, 8 core/16 thread.
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair VI Hero
Graphics card: MSI Nvidia GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G
Ram: 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4-2400 DIMM CL14 Dual Kit
Hard Drives: Samsung 850 PRO+ WD BLUE 2tb.(possibility of changing 850 pro for 250 960 Evo)
Power supply: Crosair RMx 750W
Case: Be qiuet Dark base 900 black/silver
Operating System: Win 10
what do you think?
If the discussion on the 'leaked' benchmarks in these forums is any indication, then it would be better to invest in faster RAM for Ryzen.
Get the fastest possible frequency at the lowest possible latency that fits your budget.so should i goo for higher frequency or lower CL?
Faster in a sense of lower latency.If the discussion on the 'leaked' benchmarks in these forums is any indication, then it would be better to invest in faster RAM for Ryzen.
Both, keeping a close eye towards the absolute latency.so should i goo for higher frequency or lower CL?
You can always try OCing, though yes, the modules that are better suited to it are also more expensive. The Vengeance LPX series has one with 3200MHz C15, that should be of good value as you're more likely to see improvements with frequency than latency, though the particular Ryzen benchmark in question was mostly latency-bound.what about 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-2400 DIMM CL10 Dual Kit ?
I don't know what the tangible difference is between the 1700 and 1800 chips, so I haven't decided which chip to get yet. I'd like to reward AMD by getting their top tier chip, but if I can get the same performance from a less expensive model, then I'd be really stupid not to do that. That's the enthusiast way and it always has been. Simply buying the most expensive part is not the enthusiast way, and it seems that AMD may bring back not only competition, but the ability to get a great deal through buying a less expensive part and tweaking it to get top tier performance.
Just for aesthetics to be honest...I kind of like these. The case is sexy with clear message. Why do you plan to change the fans? The blades look like very efficient type.
The 1700 looks like a bargain comparable to the venerable celeron 300a. Imo its 20 years since we saw something as good for enthusiast.
The memory speed support is mainly software dependent, as long as the board (chipset) supports overclocking.
As with every other platform, lower the timings the better.
I'm still somewhat drawn between 1700, 1700X and 1800X. My decision depends a lot on overall ST performance and the XFR performance of Ryzen. Unless 1700 is considerably worse than leaked, then that's the minimum i'd buy
I'm also really torn between whether to use Noctua NH-D15S or CM MasterLiquid 280. I would like to try out liquid cooling ... but I struggle to find a single review which would not tell me, that Noctua is either quieter or more efficient than any (decently priced) closed loop cooling. Is the situation really that absurd?
Anyway, current PLANS:
Common Parts:
CPU: Ryzen R7 1800X (or 1700X)
GPU: MSI GTX 970 (recycled)
MoBo: ASUS Crosshair VI Hero (X370)
Mem: 3200 Mhz CL16 (2x8GB) RipjawsV 1.2V (due to insane pricing, will switch to 32GB at some point)
SSD: Samsung 960 EVO 500GB
HDD: (recycled)
PSU: 650W PSU 650W EVGA SuperNOVA G2
AIR:
Case: Fractal Design Define C
Cooling: Noctua NH-D15S
Water:
Case: Fractal Design Define S
Cooling: Cooler Master MasterLiquid Pro 280
Is Noctua (or tower coolers in general) really that good?
My Hyper 212+ was also supposed to be great on my current i5 2500K ... but 6 years later (and only very limited overclocking in 2013, never over stock voltage), I need to open my case while playing Witcher 3 @stock just to stop it from overheating!
I guess i should move my lazy ass and reapply the 6-year old thermal paste, but still ....such experience makes me doubt the awesomeness of the super-duper tower open-air coolers. Whats your suggestion?
I would really appreciate any suggestions or advice on whether to go liquid or not 🙂
Cel 300a was dirt cheap. But with zen 1700 we get a top of the line cpu with massive ammounts of cache and cores. Actually its first time in history as i can remember we can oc such a top of the line cpu that we can oc near/aprox 50%. Right?Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but remember the 300a was something of a "mistake", that we're very unlikely to see repeated.
BTW, "mistake" as in being far too good value for the asking price. I don't think Intel was happy about about that.
I don't know about you, but I've seen unoptimized finite-difference PDE solvers in Fortran easily eat up 6-8 threads on an i7 3770.I would really like to have a 8C/16T Ryzen but I'm not so interested in games and overcklocking. I have never been able to get out the most from 16 threads in programming. Even 8 threads can be hard enough. I would like to have something faster than standard DDR4 like in some Intel mobos.