Anandtech article on the new 35 watt cpu's coming out
AMD Readies Ryzen 3 2200GE & Ryzen 5 2400GE APUs with Reduced TDP
Interesting, i belive more and more each day about the Athlon 200GE.
Anandtech article on the new 35 watt cpu's coming out
AMD Readies Ryzen 3 2200GE & Ryzen 5 2400GE APUs with Reduced TDP
https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8520/amd-ryzen-3-2200g-5-2400g-review/index8.htmlAny review used higher than 3200 Memory and OC for the iGPU ???
This was going to be my exact next question as well!!Any review used higher than 3200 Memory and OC for the iGPU ???
Is there going to be a higher SKU then the R5 2400G or is this going to be the flagship model??
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12428/amd-readies-ryzen-3-2200ge-ryzen-5-2400ge-apus-with-reduced-tdpsales of traditional desktops are stagnating at best. Meanwhile, demand for small form-factor desktops is growing
I think we have diferent definitions for "rant". I said AMD should have released the drivers sooner because what the OEM are providing is making them look bad. Not that they would not launch the drivers today.
That is not a rant, but wharever.
WTH is wrong with AMD? they plan to do a worldwide launch of RR tomorrow and they still havent put up a working RR driver?
Personally I think AMD when they reach 7nm process should have a 6 core Ryzen G CPU w/ 8MB of L3 cashe.Unlikely, the 2400G is already stretched to the max at 3.6, the focus is on SFF and the lower power parts, wich is the actual purpose of this die as according to Computerbase Raven Ridge use a 14nm+ process optimised for density.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12428/amd-readies-ryzen-3-2200ge-ryzen-5-2400ge-apus-with-reduced-tdp
If the rumors are correct, and Next gen, 7 nm Epyc has 256 MB L3 cache, it will mean single CCX to have 32 MB's of L3 cache, and therefore APU version can have 16 MB's of L3 cache.Personally I think AMD when they reach 7nm process should have a 6 core Ryzen G CPU w/ 8MB of L3 cashe.
Really? Is that what you mean when you said_______________ ?
The drivers and whatnot were on the flash drive that was in the box for the official press review kit.
The press reviewers had everything needed.
Personally I think AMD when they reach 7nm process should have a 6 core Ryzen G CPU w/ 8MB of L3 cashe.
Why would AMD release drivers officially BEFORE APUs would go on sale, officially?And what do think i going to say after watching a video of a guy who got the 2400G early, using OEM drivers labeled "with Raven Ridge support" that crashes every 5 minutes? "nah thats fine?" Thats some kind of selective memory you got there.
And what do think i going to say after watching a video of a guy who got the 2400G early, using OEM drivers labeled "with Raven Ridge support" that crashes every 5 minutes? "nah thats fine?" Thats some kind of selective memory you got there.
No, you don't need 2GB system RAM allocated to the GPU.
What's your recommendation to buy? Something around the same price point, but with better performance for the cash?
Well after reading some reviews, the CPU part is performing better than expected for its 4MB L3, thats a good thing.
IGP performance is just not good enoght, the 2400G has a rather large IGP that is barely trading blows with the GT1030 that is the slower dgpu on the market...
None of those are current gen cards, though.There are GT 710, 730, 740, R5 240 and R5 250 in decent supply.
Those are slower than the GT 1030.
The mental gymnastics are strong here: instead of spending $90 on an extra stick of RAM and future proof the memory subsystem... why not get an overclocked 1030 for 10% extra performance.a 2nd option is 2200G + Single Channel DDR4-2400 + GT1030 overcloked
Why would AMD release drivers officially BEFORE APUs would go on sale, officially?
The mental gymnastics are strong here: instead of spending $90 on an extra stick of RAM and future proof the memory subsystem... why not get an overclocked 1030 for 10% extra performance.
The mental gymnastics are strong here: instead of spending $90 on an extra stick of RAM and future proof the memory subsystem... why not get an overclocked 1030 for 10% extra performance.
Not even that. Getting 2x4GB sticks is barely more money than a 1x8GB stick. The level at which you game on a 1030 or this iGPU is not going to care about 7.5GB, or even 6GB vs. 8GB, and puts you within what could nearly margin of error of a 1030. I'm not sure why you'd do 2200G + 1030 over a 2400G in that case.
There are GT 710, 730, 740, R5 240 and R5 250 in decent supply.
Those are slower than the GT 1030.
According to Anandtech, that market is now killed.A igpu can't be too good from AMD otherwise it will start cannibalising their own dedicated gpu market (the lower end stuff).