RussianSensation
Elite Member
- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
This is unfortunate for AMD but a lot of things people my have been praising them for could have contributed. The massive write offs of at least 100million $$ were all from older stocks of products that they did not sell.
It's like no matter how many times I repeat it, it goes from one ear and leaves the other. AMD said Revenue fell 10% for the entire firm. You realize Desktop Discrete GPUs are just 8% of the entire firm?
Correlating AMD's stock price falling 50-60% in the last 6 months, AMD having $100 million writedown as being related to desktop discrete GPUs, it's financially impossible. Why can't you connect the dots and see that AMD's failure largely relates to 90% of other products such as Llano, Bulldozer, Opteron CPUs, losing designs wins to Kepler in the mobile space, etc.?
Not to mention we know AMD's discrete GPU division gained market share last quarter. If you gained market share that means your inventory was selling, not sitting idle. That's another sign that it's not desktop graphics that's the problem here.
Why is it you continue to ignore 92% of the company and continue to put the blame on how AMD is doing by focusing on desktop graphics products when the math simply does not add up?
You realize if AMD HD7000 series made 50% less money than HD6000 series on the desktop, that would drop the stock price just 4% and if the entire desktop discrete GPU line was discontinued, the stock would fall 8%?
The best part is AMD's "Computing Solutions" Group has nothing to do with its GPU department. Where did AMD say the main weakness came from? Their Computing Solutions unit.
"...which contributed to lower than anticipated average selling prices (ASPs) for the company’s computing solutions group products and lower than expected utilization of its back-end manufacturing facilities"
There is no mention at all about inventory issues for desktop GPUs, or declining ASPs for graphics cards.
Your entire Post #30 has not an ounce of truth in it about what's really happening at AMD.
Here is the most shocking part - what you keep saying is contrary to facts.
"Meanwhile on the GPU side of things this was the first quarter where AMD’s new Southern Islands GPUs were shipping, which is both good news and bad news for AMD. Traditionally quarters where major new GPU architectures are introduced see lower revenue as customers hold off on purchases, and with the launch of Southern Islands early in the year this was no exception. However new GPUs also launch at higher prices, which pushes margins up. The net result is that while revenue takes a step back profits increase, which is exactly what AMD needs at the moment. Altogether AMD booked 2M of GPU revenue in Q1’12 with an operating income of M, versus 413M in revenue with an operating income of only M in Q1’11. The increase in operating income over Q1’11 is thanks in large part to AMD’s nearly quarter-long 28nm product lead, combined with AMD’s conservative pricing." ~ Source
As I said before, the first mover advantage strategy with high prices lowered AMD's GPU revenue but made them more $ than in the past. This is exactly why they did it. So again, you can keep putting the blame all you want on HD7000 desktop discrete GPUs but real worlds facts from market share to profits for that unit contradict your opinion. Ironically, it is AMD's desktop GPUs that have been doing OK, not the claims you keep making that HD7000 series was poorly executed by AMD.
It appears 90% of AMD's problems stem somewhere else then. You can either face the facts, or continue to ignore them, putting the blame on HD7000 desktop cards.
Last edited: