All the following threads have been and will be destroyed by fanbois on one side or the other:
Compute
AMD : It's ESSENTIAL (circa 2010-2012); It's stupid (circa 2007-2009)
NV : It's stupid (circa 2012); It's essential (before 2012)
3D
NV : It's great! Immersive
AMD : It's only in a few crappy games and sucks
Multi-Monitor Gaming
AMD : We have had it for years and it used to be great
NV : It sucked back then and only NV games work on it...
Gaming (In-general)
NV : These cherry-picked titles are all that matters; just so happens NV crushes in benches for them.
AMD : These cherry-picked titles are all that matters; just so happens AMD crushes in benches for them.
Power consumption:
AMD : Doesn't matter, I want POWER (when less efficient); Doesn't matter, mine idles better (when idle is better); doesn't matter at all (when the product just sucks)
NV : Doesn't matter, I want POWER (when less efficient); Doesn't matter, mine idles better (when idle is better); doesn't matter at all (when the product just sucks)
-Drivers
AMD : AMD drivers are way better, I/or a friend used to have a NV machine that crashed all the time and sucked. This means AMD is much better.
NV : NV drivers are way better, I/or a friend used to have a AMD machine that crashed all the time and sucked. This means NV is much better. Also, read about all the bad AMD drivers from 10 years ago! That's obviously the same as now...
-Multi-GPU
AMD : These cherry-picked titles have WAY better scaling and driver support. I guess I am just lucky that I only like games that work well on AMD...
NV : These cherry-picked titles have WAY better scaling and driver support. I guess I am just lucky that I only like games that work well on NV...
There, that takes care of a good few hundred threads we could all waste our time posting in.