Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
Listen to this man he is an expert in this field.
Ok, you made me laugh.
Listen to this man he is an expert in this field.
No. If an incel feels the need to procreate he can just rape women until they get pregnant and he can die knowing his DNA has been passed on.Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?
No. If an incel feels the need to procreate he can just rape women until they get pregnant and he can die knowing his DNA has been passed on.
Uhhh... you realize... rape itself... is still a crime, right? Even after AL passed this ridiculous bill.
They might remove the ability to abort for rape victims (which i completely disagree with)... but they still will be locked away in "pound me in the ass" prison for the act itself.
Oh how comforting. Not only will the woman still have to carry her rapists baby and pay for all the medical bills associated with bringing a baby to term but there is still a chance that she could die from complications.
Why not just kick the woman while she's down, maybe tell her its all her fault while you are at it.
Why do you hate women? Didn't you say you have a daughter? Karma is a bitch you know.
Reading comprehension.
You fail at it.
Not surprising for people that are mentally deficient.
Mourning two is a personal decision. AFAIK no state issues 2 death certificates. Science does not state a fetus feels pain in the 1st trimester. They do in the second.Not really. There are already wild inconsistencies on the legal rights we extend to the unborn. If you were to murder a pregnant woman, the family would mourn two deaths, not one. Viability is a poor threshold for personhood, as a fetus is capable of experiencing pain in the first trimester.
Abortion is a sh!tty topic for which there is no good answer. I reject the notion that a fetus is just a clump of cells. I also reject limiting abortion in absence of investments in birth control and sex education.
Thing about that opinion, it is perfect for you. Get it??Abortion is not wrong until it is. I'm not 100% pro-life and I'm not 100% pro-choice. I agree with abortion when there has been incest, rape, or there is a threat to the mother's health/life. Outside of those things, the further along the pregnancy gets, the more against abortion I get. I don't have any problem with early abortion, none.
I hope the governor does not sign this into law. Those who voted for it might have just slit their own political throats. Hell, even nutty Pat Robertson says it's too far.
Oh how comforting. Not only will the woman still have to carry her rapists baby and pay for all the medical bills associated with bringing a baby to term but there is still a chance that she could die from complications.
Why not just kick the woman while she's down, maybe tell her its all her fault while you are at it.
Why do you hate women? Didn't you say you have a daughter? Karma is a bitch you know.
Please elaborate on how embryonic citizenship is not more difficult. I'm riveted.No more or less difficult than other scenarios involving citizenship.
I lean pro-life but I really think there should at least be exceptions for rape as well as medical reasoning. Like if the baby is not going to make it, and/or the mother is in danger. Then it should be legal.
Speaking of kicking when down:
Michigan rapist gets joint custody
"A Sanilac County Circuit judge has granted parenting time and joint legal custody of an 8-year-old boy to a convicted sex offender who allegedly raped the child’s mother nine years ago."
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/n...ictim-attacker-joint-child-custody/106374256/
The problem with the precedence set by Roe V Wade is that its based on privacy, not science. This is why the trimester framework no longer exists in favor of viability. If science were to establish consciousness in the first trimester, then privacy becomes a secondary consideration to personhood.Mourning two is a personal decision. AFAIK no state issues 2 death certificates. Science does not state a fetus feels pain in the 1st trimester. They do in the second.
When life begins is a topic that should be left up to science not laymen or clergy. Absent that you are left with individual opinions foisted on the populous.
Example enacting laws that state fertilized eggs are a person ends up banning birth control.
How is it any different than Dreamers? Most doctors are able to establish the date of conception to a high degree of accuracy. I suppose this becomes problematic if the date of entry and conception fall within a matter of days, but how many women are going to enter our country and immediately get pregnant? Some may cross within a month of getting pregnant, and those will be handled on a case by case basis.Please elaborate on how embryonic citizenship is not more difficult. I'm riveted.
Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?
No. If an incel feels the need to procreate he can just rape women until they get pregnant and he can die knowing his DNA has been passed on.
EDIT: Add on top of that courts that have statistically been completely sexist against fathers that wish to be a part of the kid's life - or take full custody when it was damn well obvious whom the better parent was.
Because choice of job and the debate over the rights of an unborn child are equivalent.I lean towards mind your own fucking business. When did half this country turn into Gladys Kravitz from Bewitched. Do people really have so little going on in their own lives that they can only make themselves feel validated by interfering in the lives of others? Against abortion? Cool. Make it a life goal to never have one. I find it ironic that if you took ANY other aspect of a person's PRIVATE life, and tried to let government regulate it, there would be riots in the street.
Who here want Uncle Sugar to issue you a wife?
Who here wants government to order you to work a particular job?
Crickets? I thought so.
Leave other people the fuck alone.
View attachment 6370
Because choice of job and the debate over the rights of an unborn child are equivalent.
I’m going to hell for this one.
![]()
The problem with the precedence set by Roe V Wade is that its based on privacy, not science. This is why the trimester framework no longer exists in favor of viability. If science were to establish consciousness in the first trimester, then privacy becomes a secondary consideration to personhood.
What defines consciousness and personhood? Heart beat? Brain function? The ability to feel pain? Hard to say. We extend personhood to people in vegetative states. Dementia and alzheimers rob people of their identity but not their personhood.
Since we don’t know when consciousness begins, I would prefer to err on the side of caution
Eggs or sperm in and of themselves do not deserve the same protections.