senseamp
Lifer
- Feb 5, 2006
- 35,787
- 6,195
- 126
They should talk to their parents then.What's really sad is when you think about how many of those "reproductive aged women" are too young to vote their own representation on the matter.
They should talk to their parents then.What's really sad is when you think about how many of those "reproductive aged women" are too young to vote their own representation on the matter.
Clearly you've never been to Philippines or India.. abortion being illegal and children panhandling as far as the eye can see.
Being forced to take responsibility for making a baby -- isn't that quite the opposite of being "free to knock-up anyone?"Happy all you right wingers? I guess the answer is yes. Alabama adult males are free to knock up all the 12 year old girls they want. We know from a recent vote a plurality of white residents are fine with it.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alabam...-no-exceptions-for-rape-or-incest-2019-05-14/
People can try and take a middle road with abortion but in order to be logically consistent there can only be two positions; abortion is legal and the woman has control over her own body or abortion is murder. There is no logical consistency to those that say a woman has a right to an abortion...except... Just as there is no logical consistency for people who believe that a woman cannot murder a fetus...except...
Women either have control of their body or they don't.
Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?Good news for incels looking to procreate I guess.
The next step of subjugation maybe? Everyone gets a government mandated woman?Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?
Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?
Concierge Abortion Doctors.So now only criminals will get abortions?
I wonder where all the rapey GOP senators and other legislators in Alabama are going to have to go to get their girlfriends' and daughters' abortions?
Is Roy Moore going to have to flee now?
Clearly you've never been to Philippines or India.. abortion being illegal and children panhandling as far as the eye can see.
If you believe a fetus is a person, a woman’s control of her body is secondary as she is the host of another life.Where you messed up is conflating a family's feels with actual laws that recognize a fetus as a person, there aren't any. Sure there are increased penalties for murdering a woman and her fetus but they are similar to hate crimes penalties and no one thinks hate crime victims get additional rights that non hate crime victims get.
People can try and take a middle road with abortion but in order to be logically consistent there can only be two positions; abortion is legal and the woman has control over her own body or abortion is murder. There is no logical consistency to those that say a woman has a right to an abortion...except... Just as there is no logical consistency for people who believe that a woman cannot murder a fetus...except...
Women either have control of their body or they don't.
What kind of hyperbole is this? The previous penalty for rape / incest was allowing the mother to abort the baby? So there's no penalty for rape / incest when it doesn't result in pregnancy? You really believe rapists are all trying to make babies?Well, Alabama has effectively decriminalizee rape AND incest. Knock up your daughter's sister, they still have to have your kid.
That's something I'm sure Trump can relate to.
View attachment 6363
I disagree that there can't be a middle road, at least in terms of the philosophy regarding abortion. On the one hand, I'd say that anyone that feels that the fetus should be treated as equivalent to a person starting from the moment of conception is ludicrous. On the flip side, I'd say that anyone arguing that a fetus the day before birth is of any less moral value than a born baby is equally ludicrous. I would also contend that providing a woman 7 months time to get an abortion provides her with ample opportunity to make decisions regarding her own body. If there really were cases where women waited until the 9th month of pregnancy and then just randomly decided to have an abortion, I would actually oppose her right to do so. Just as I would oppose a woman's right to not feed a newborn child. A person's right to his or her own body does not extend to neglect of a dependent child. I would say that this is a valid argument towards the end of a pregnancy, however not at the beginning of the pregnancy.Where you messed up is conflating a family's feels with actual laws that recognize a fetus as a person, there aren't any. Sure there are increased penalties for murdering a woman and her fetus but they are similar to hate crimes penalties and no one thinks hate crime victims get additional rights that non hate crime victims get.
People can try and take a middle road with abortion but in order to be logically consistent there can only be two positions; abortion is legal and the woman has control over her own body or abortion is murder. There is no logical consistency to those that say a woman has a right to an abortion...except... Just as there is no logical consistency for people who believe that a woman cannot murder a fetus...except...
Women either have control of their body or they don't.
Forcing the woman to have the baby in no way forces the father to be responsible for said baby.Being forced to take responsibility for making a baby -- isn't that quite the opposite of being "free to knock-up anyone?"
Forcing the woman to have the baby in no way forces the father to be responsible for said baby.
Forcing the woman to have the baby in no way forces the father to be responsible for said baby.
It forces her to carry the fetus to term or potentially face charges.Shit man, it doesn't even force the girl to.
Please explain the relevance to incels. They'll suddenly be able to get laid?? WTF?
It seems the implication is that incels can't get woman to procreate willingly, so rape is now an alternative to procreation with any woman you like, because she can't terminate the pregnancy.
It really didn't seem that hard to grasp.
Incels aren't choosing not to have sex ("involuntarily celibate"). Also it's a very strange jump to assume most rapists and incels even want to procreate. Most would just want sexual gratification.It seems the implication is that incels can't get woman to procreate willingly, so rape is now an alternative to procreation with any woman you like, because she can't terminate the pregnancy.
It really didn't seem that hard to grasp.
Incels aren't choosing not to have sex ("involuntarily celibate"). Also it's an very strange jump to assume most rapists and incels even want to procreate. Most would just want sexual gratification.