God that's pathetic. I don't even know how that would hold-up in court.
To my knowledge (Correct me if I'm wrong) a state doesn't have jurisdiction authority to charge someone with a crime in another state...because... it's their jurisdiction... deeerrp.
Plus I don't know how they would find out to charge someone - medical records are private. Seems entirely unenforceable.
I guess the reasoning is that:
--it is a federal crime (Really, can states enforce federal crimes? I guess not--but if they define the act as murder, legally, it defaults to a federal crime, right? I guess this is a separate issue tied into this whole clusterfuck)
--So, if you engage in a federal crime, murder being kinda serious, in any other state and return to your home state, there is no jurisdiction. you can still be prosecuted.
The way to get around it would be to just never return, right? Obviously that isn't reasonable for the average person, and is monumentally stupid for the state. But these states are run by ignorant morons, so go figure.
I mentioned this in the concurrent Georgia thread (I think), but this sort of thing could end up creating a modern Underground Railroad, yet again. Flee the south, of course, if you want to be treated as a human being and not state property, right?
Where have we seen this type of model before? hmmm