• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Airbus A380: So big; it's useless.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
From a Civil Engineering standpoint:

Airport runways will have to be repaved and/or redesigned (lengthen) because the A380 is probably much heavier than a 747 Jumbo. Pavements aren't designed for A380 probably, and will require more maintanence.



I guess airlines could make use of it IF they fill the planes with passengers. A lot of flights are pretty empty these days.
Click to expand...

I've heard the 380 has lower pressure on pavements (more/bigger wheels) than the 747. The problem would be some of the airports use overpasses which might not be strong enough to support an A380.
 
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
From a Civil Engineering standpoint:

Airport runways will have to be repaved and/or redesigned (lengthen) because the A380 is probably much heavier than a 747 Jumbo. Pavements aren't designed for A380 probably, and will require more maintanence.
Click to expand...

Not really. The A380 has flown around the world, visint a few major airports. Nobody mentioned anything about requiring a special kind of runway.

Runways are built to higher standards for many reasons. When an aircraft lands in heavy crosswinds, it usually makes a bumpy landing (which exerts a lot of pressure on the runway).

I guess airlines could make use of it IF they fill the planes with passengers. A lot of flights are pretty empty these days.
Click to expand...

You'd have to look high and low to find a flight between a major US city and a major Asian city that isn't almost full.
 
Originally posted by: iamaelephant
Originally posted by: Pepsei
when are they going to stop adding blades to my razor!??!!? isn't 5 enough?
Click to expand...

There is never enough! I'm still anticipating the Shick Deca.
Click to expand...

Just you wait, Gillette will release the Mach Fusion 3GHz (powered by a 3GHz processor and a high energy laser beam instead of blades). That'll start the gigahertz wars again.
 
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
From a Civil Engineering standpoint:

Airport runways will have to be repaved and/or redesigned (lengthen) because the A380 is probably much heavier than a 747 Jumbo. Pavements aren't designed for A380 probably, and will require more maintanence.



I guess airlines could make use of it IF they fill the planes with passengers. A lot of flights are pretty empty these days.
Click to expand...


Where are you flying? Every flight I have been on in the last 5 months has been PACKED.

I have even gotten my upgrade a few days early on a few occasions because the flight was that over booked.
 
So far the A380 has been a financial failure with massive delays leading to carriers pulling out orders. I hope it will work out for them, but the upper management incompetence has not been reassuring.
 
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Wouldn't airports/tarmacs/terminals have to be redesigned for the 7E7 Dreamliner as well, because of its size?
Click to expand...

The 787 family has a wide range, but all of them are smaller than a 747.
 
it has to be in service to make remarks like this, which it isnt yet. they cant even build a couple of these things.
 
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Wouldn't airports/tarmacs/terminals have to be redesigned for the 7E7 Dreamliner as well, because of its size?
Click to expand...

The 7E7 will seat about 200-300 passengers. As such, it is smaller than the 747 class (more than 450 passengers). The high point of the 7E7 would be fuel efficiency, not record cargo/passenger capacity. They will take the place of existing planes (but will be cheaper to fly)
 
im sure they said the same about 747. If airbus pulls their heads out of their collective asses and actually build 'em (wiring what?), they'll sell well.

This plane is a cost effective transcontinetal transport and the amount of preorders they had shows it as such.
 
It was a good idea that failed in execution.

Airbus could have really come out strong had they executed properly. As to why they had all the failures they did....Who knows. Weight savings? Cost cutting? Union? God only knows.

As with any new product going to market, you have alot of hurdles and it only takes one to really trip you up for the rest of the race. Airbus has had a few. Boeing is eating their asses out right now, and unless Airbus *really* gets it together (Or gets a massive handout from the EU......THAT never happens) this plane is gonna sink them.

That said, I'm lovin it.
 
Once they have it done, it'll surely outdo Boeing. The reason Boeing is doing well now is only because of Airbus's problems.
 
I think a plane like this will work out just fine on the long haul routes.

Many of the airports I've been to need to upgrade anyway... lol

Unfortunately the airlines will just squeeze more people onto it, instead of making it more comfortable.

Everytime I saw the 380 mocked up, or drawn, with a casino, a restrurant, a lounge, sleeping cabins, etc. I just had to LMAO, because I know that will never happen... why put anything but seats in a space where you could put 100 more paying passengers.
 
Originally posted by: zoiks
Once they have it done, it'll surely outdo Boeing. The reason Boeing is doing well now is only because of Airbus's problems.
Click to expand...
The market for planes this big is quite small. Boeing went after a larger market share with the 787, and right now at least, that's looking like the smart move. Add Airbus's problems on top of it and it might be bailout time.
 
Isn't the breakeven well over 400 planes now? I remember when Airbus was saying less than 100 to breakeven.

The 747 has been around for more than 35 years and has only sold around 1,300.
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Isn't the breakeven well over 400 planes now? I remember when Airbus was saying less than 100 to breakeven.

The 747 has been around for more than 35 years and has only sold around 1,300.
Click to expand...

Yep, it's 420.
 
Originally posted by: zoiks
Once they have it done, it'll surely outdo Boeing. The reason Boeing is doing well now is only because of Airbus's problems.
Click to expand...

Doubtful. With the breakeven point now over 400....Its hard to tell if it will ever break even. The A380 is really a sppecialized airplane. Its made to haul alot[/] of people from a major airport to another. IIts not the type of airplane you hop from Atlanta to Miami on.
As such, the volume will probably be somewhat low in comparison to smaller aircraft that can serve more functions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top