Airbus A380: So big; it's useless.

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,571
4
81
This thing is a monster!

You would spend more time walking accross the runway then boarding the A380 than the time spent actually flying. A plane on the ground is a plane that is not making money. Also there are a total of TWO airports that capable of landing such a large aircraft. Pointless and null due to it's size.
 

AccruedExpenditure

Diamond Member
May 12, 2001
6,960
7
81
Originally posted by: Googer
This thing is a monster!

You would spend more time walking accross the runway then boarding the A380 than the time spent actually flying. A plane on the ground is a plane that is not making money. Also there are a total of TWO airports that capable of landing such a large aircraft. Pointless and null due to it's size.

This plane isn't built for America. It's built for Asia, and they'll find a market there.
 

Sluggo

Lifer
Jun 12, 2000
15,488
5
81
Well, certainly not the best choice for commuter flights.

But for 12+hour flights, the more people you can get packed into one plane the more economically feasible it will be.
 
Aug 25, 2004
11,151
1
81
Originally posted by: AccruedExpenditure
Originally posted by: Googer
This thing is a monster!

You would spend more time walking accross the runway then boarding the A380 than the time spent actually flying. A plane on the ground is a plane that is not making money. Also there are a total of TWO airports that capable of landing such a large aircraft. Pointless and null due to it's size.

This plane isn't built for America. It's built for Asia, and they'll find a market there.

China, for one, has a growing airline market.

There are plenty of flights between Asia and EU/US. Since the number of flights between countries is restricted by treaties and agreements, the airlines want to squeeze in more people per flight.

I think you should wait and watch what happens. Boeing has similar problems when they were trying to introduce the 747. But they pulled it off.
 

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,571
4
81
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks pretty damn cool to me.

It's so big that Airport terminals cannot accomodate it. In order to board such a beast, you will have to walk from the front enterance to the last terminal then walk some more all the way accross the tarmac and then stand in line and wait to be boarded. Once you are boarded, you will have to wait even longer for every one else to get on.


Finaly the plane takes off and the flight is smooth but when time comes for you to land. THe process will start all over but in reverese

Wait to get off, walk accross 1 mile of tarmac, walk some more, and keep walking.


The A380 is a big passanger timewaster. But if could prove usefull if China decides to jump on the Illegal Immigration Bandwagon that was started by Mexico. One A380 is a heck of a lot cheaper than providing food and healthcare for 15 million Chinnese Citizens. :D
 

akshatp

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,349
0
76
They already have plans in place to have special gates for this awesome beast. At least I know Virgin is planning to at heathrow. Sad about the delays though...
 
Aug 25, 2004
11,151
1
81
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks pretty damn cool to me.

It's so big that Airport terminals cannot accomodate it. In order to board such a beast, you will have to walk from the front enterance to the last terminal then walk some more all the way accross the tarmac and then stand in line and wait to be boarded. Once you are boarded, you will have to wait even longer for every one else to get on.

Where exactly are you getting this information?

Finaly the plane takes off and the flight is smooth but when time comes for you to land. THe process will start all over but in reverese

Yes, but cheaper tickets >> slight inconvenience.

Wait to get off, walk accross 1 mile of tarmac, walk some more, and keep walking.

Isn't this why they have buses on the tarmac and travelators in terminals for? You obviously need to travel some more.

The A380 is a big passanger timewaster. But if could prove usefull if China decides to jump on the Illegal Immigration Bandwagon that was started by Mexico. One A380 is a heck of a lot cheaper than providing food and healthcare for 15 million Chinnese Citizens. :D

You
 

Mardeth

Platinum Member
Jul 24, 2002
2,608
0
0
Originally posted by: Googer

Wait to get off, walk accross 1 mile of tarmac, walk some more, and keep walking.

Im guessing you have never been to an airport before.
 
Aug 25, 2004
11,151
1
81
Originally posted by: Sluggo
Originally posted by: Calin
Originally posted by: Googer
This thing is a monster!

What is the red and white thing in the top left corner of the image?

Looks like a fighter plane of some sort, possibly a Mirage.

I don't understand what a Kingfisher aircraft is doing in that photo (not that it isn't a good airline). It's just named after a really crappy beer.
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
62
91
It's not going to reach break even as early as they thought. Launch partners are pulling out. Wiring mess forced a delay that is costing billions.
 

intogamer

Lifer
Dec 5, 2004
19,219
1
76
How does this thing do in comparison with what Boeing is releasing?

I'd say its only good for cargo unless they add a hell more doors
 

akshatp

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,349
0
76
Man that thing DWARFS the tiny little Kingfisher A320..

I don't understand what a Kingfisher aircraft is doing in that photo (not that it isn't a good airline). It's just named after a really crappy beer.

It wasn't named after Kingfisher beer, the company that makes Kingfisher beer created and own/operate this airline. The beer that is bottled and consumed in India is way better than the stuff they bottle in America.
 

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
omg i'll bet everyone at airbus wishes they had consulted with you before they built and engineered the craft. they would NEVER have thought of all these things prior to building such a plane. thank THE LORD JESUS we have you to show us the light.
 

B00ne

Platinum Member
May 21, 2001
2,168
1
0
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks pretty damn cool to me.

It's so big that Airport terminals cannot accomodate it. In order to board such a beast, you will have to walk from the front enterance to the last terminal then walk some more all the way accross the tarmac and then stand in line and wait to be boarded. Once you are boarded, you will have to wait even longer for every one else to get on.


Finaly the plane takes off and the flight is smooth but when time comes for you to land. THe process will start all over but in reverese

Wait to get off, walk accross 1 mile of tarmac, walk some more, and keep walking.


The A380 is a big passanger timewaster. But if could prove usefull if China decides to jump on the Illegal Immigration Bandwagon that was started by Mexico. One A380 is a heck of a lot cheaper than providing food and healthcare for 15 million Chinnese Citizens. :D

I guess Airbus, and all the airlines that ordered it should have asked you before they made their decision.

btw it aint that much bigger than a 747 - and that is the plane the 380 could be compared with not the 787, which is a different different concept. Like van vs. a bus
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
From a Civil Engineering standpoint:

Airport runways will have to be repaved and/or redesigned (lengthen) because the A380 is probably much heavier than a 747 Jumbo. Pavements aren't designed for A380 probably, and will require more maintanence.



I guess airlines could make use of it IF they fill the planes with passengers. A lot of flights are pretty empty these days.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,110
925
126
Airbus will die because of their delays. No airline is going to trust them.