Ahmadinejad says Israel will soon disappear

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

 

[tvarad]

Aimster:

"Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because ?"

Because the world shouldn't deal with the problem AFTER Israel is toast.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: bamacre
What the neo-cons and palehorse would like is to first get the Americans to believe that something has to be done about Iran.

I sincerely hope that you're not dumb enough to lump me in with the neocons. Let's get something straight, I have never advocated a violent response to Iran's actions, and I sincerely hope and pray, every day, that it never comes to that -- please get that through your thick fucking skull.

They don't need to say what something is. Just that something MUST be done, and there's no way around it. Once they get that belief embedded into the American people, Iran can finally be seen as the great threat to the American people. Then the great debate begins on exactly what something will be. Hmm, sanctions?

As opposed to...? or....? and...?

Yes, sanctions is a good start. And inspections, do NOT forget the inspections!! We know where this ends.

I'm guessing it ends with people like you failing, once again, to provide us with any viable alternatives... am I wrong?

Answer this question: Do you advocate doing nothing at all to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? A simple Yes or No will suffice.

I would support "nothing" over an invasion. I would support "nothing" over giving them a bunch of free shit at taxpayer's expense.

That seems to be the only choices. Oh, except for your idea of "something," of which I haven't yet calculated the details.

:roll:

I don't see a logical reason why they shouldn't be allowed to have nukes. Your fear of Iran using them preemptively is insane. And it's the only rationale you have for them not being allowed to have them.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: Kappo

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran is not going to attack Israel

Thinking that is stupid.

If Iran wanted Israel destroyed it would start arming terrorist groups with chemical weapons.

The guy just speaks to get people hyped up... Persians do not care about Arabs. It's all B.S.
If Israel attacked the Arab world Iran would sit back and watch acting like they cared. In reality they don't care.

They just want to annoy the U.S

If someone threatened to rape and kill your mother, I suppose those kinds of threats would be different?

He isn't threatening force.

U.S calls Iran's regime a disaster and constantly puts it down.

Israel is a Jewish state. There are Jews who believe against such a state and are on the Iranian Presidents side. They too preach about an end to Israel and they live in Israel.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

U.S supports terrorist. U.S arms terrorist. U.S invades nation. U.S attacks nations.

I cannot name one single thing Iran has done wrong that the U.S hasn't done.

& Iran's President sounds like Bush or McCain. He is no better or worse than either of those men.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: tvarad
Aimster:

"Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because ?"

Because the world shouldn't deal with the problem AFTER Israel is toast.

Iran is not going to attack Israel.

If you believe so you are part of the phobia wagon.

The only way Iran will attack Israel is if Israel attacks Iran.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: palehorse
Answer this question: Do you advocate doing nothing at all to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? A simple Yes or No will suffice.

I would support "nothing" over an invasion. I would support "nothing" over giving them a bunch of free shit at taxpayer's expense.

That seems to be the only choices. Oh, except for your idea of "something," of which I haven't yet calculated the details.

:roll:

I don't see a logical reason why they shouldn't be allowed to have nukes. Your fear of Iran using them preemptively is insane. And it's the only rationale you have for them not being allowed to have them.

In my above response to Aimster, I believe I spelled out the many reasons something more must be done to prevent Iran from obtaining nukes. As I've also said, I'm all ears for whatever alternatives you have to offer -- that is, besides "doing nothing."

Doing nothing would place Americans, American interests, and several of our allies, in grave peril -- so that is simply not a viable option.

Thankfully, there are much smarter people than you or I who are working on this problem day and night... my prayer is simply that they will find a solution that will not cost lives.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: DarkThinker

Originally posted by: Aimster
... Persians do not care about Arabs. It's all B.S.
If Israel attacked the Arab world Iran would sit back and watch acting like they cared. In reality they don't care.

They just want to annoy the U.S

But they still arm and finance terrorist groups in the middle east against their own countries (i.e Hizbollah, Shiites in Iraq and Kuwait...etc) so they can destroy Arabic countries from within!

But you know what? I think a thousand years is long enough, I think Arabs should go back and invade Persia once more. This whole double factor Persian / Shiite inferiority complex is doing too much damage as is to the peace and the tranquillity of the whole world. Yes, another military campaign ought to do the trick!

Also this time, we are not stopping there, we are also going to gather all the Shiites and Alawi trouble makers in the Arab world and banish them to some shithole in Iran so they stay there amongst the Shiities who claim they care for them more than their own countrymen, just to put that theory to the test!

I might be joking about the campaign thing, but it's sure one big wet dream for me nowadays to just ship all the Shiites in my home country to Iran...they never in their history contributed to the progress of my country....all they do is nag and worship the Khomeini...but maybe one day once Hizbollah is defeated, we'll work on a program of such nature if the Shiites don't get their act together.

I am so sorry Aimster you are from country full with Shiites, it must have been terrible.

The Arabs tried to invade Iran. It was called the Iran-Iraq War. The Arabs are nothing but a bunch of conquerers who like to conquer people. They failed in Israel. They failed with Iran.

The only reason Iran arms Hezbollah is to counter Israel's strength in the region. It does not wish to destroy Israel.

What for? Iranian Jews all call themselves Iranian. How many Arab Jews go around calling themselves Arab? Iranians are connected with the Jews., Iran doesn't like the regime of Israel. It has no beef with the people of Israel.

Hezbollah is Lebanese. Iran supports it. Iran does not control it. Don't blame Iran for Hezbollah. You want to blame someone for the creation of Hezbollah you go ahead and blame Israel. Israel is the one who invaded your nation. Iran stepped in and saw an opportunity.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

U.S supports terrorist. U.S arms terrorist. U.S invades nation. U.S attacks nations.

I cannot name one single thing Iran has done wrong that the U.S hasn't done.

OK, how about France, England, Germany, Spain, or any one of the other civilized nations of the world who ALSO want Iran to stop enriching uranium, and have made that known through unified sanctions and other security resolutions at the UN?

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

Hezbollah is Lebanese. Iran supports it. Iran does not control it. Don't blame Iran for Hezbollah. You want to blame someone for the creation of Hezbollah you go ahead and blame Israel. Israel is the one who invaded your nation. Iran stepped in and saw an opportunity.

you're just as f'n crazy as that Achmedinifuckwad...

"Don't blame the rapist for the rape. You want to blame someone for the rape, you go ahead and blame the whore who got raped. That whore is the one who wore short skirts. The rapist merely saw the lack of underwear and stepped in to take advantage of the opportunity."

wow...

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

U.S supports terrorist. U.S arms terrorist. U.S invades nation. U.S attacks nations.

I cannot name one single thing Iran has done wrong that the U.S hasn't done.

OK, how about France, England, Germany, Spain, or any one of the other civilized nations of the world who ALSO want Iran to stop enriching uranium, and have made that known through unified sanctions and other security resolutions at the UN?

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

Nobody is going to attack Iran. If the world was capable of attacking Iran they would have done so already. The world is going to watch Iran obtain nuclear weapons. No I do not want Iran to obtain nuclear weapons but they are going to obtain them.

If any nation attacks Iran then Iran will simply cause a major oil disaster and you will be seeing $300/barrel of oil. What world economy is capable of handing that economic disaster? Iranian missiles will take out Saudi, UAE, Kuwait oil facilities. They will take out oil ships and start a disaster. It is impossible for the world to stop Iran from doing this.

& quite frankly in the past I would have loved for the world to have started a war with Iran. I am sick and tired of a bunch of fuckfack Islamic shitheads running Iran. I would love to visit Iran and that requires the end to wizard of oz looking leaders. Unfortunately for me my mom is in the green zone. I do not wish to see Iranian rockets raining down on her so right now I have no choice but to wish for peace.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

U.S supports terrorist. U.S arms terrorist. U.S invades nation. U.S attacks nations.

I cannot name one single thing Iran has done wrong that the U.S hasn't done.

OK, how about France, England, Germany, Spain, or any one of the other civilized nations of the world who ALSO want Iran to stop enriching uranium, and have made that known through unified sanctions and other security resolutions at the UN?

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

Hezbollah is Lebanese. Iran supports it. Iran does not control it. Don't blame Iran for Hezbollah. You want to blame someone for the creation of Hezbollah you go ahead and blame Israel. Israel is the one who invaded your nation. Iran stepped in and saw an opportunity.

you're just as f'n crazy as that Achmedinifuckwad...

"Don't blame the rapist for the rape. You want to blame someone for the rape, you go ahead and blame the whore who got raped. That whore is the one who wore short skirts. The rapist merely saw the lack of underwear and stepped in to take advantage of the opportunity."

wow...

Israel invaded Lebanon. Hezbollah was created to get Israel out of Lebanon.

So yes if Israel did not invaded Lebanon Hezbollah would not have been created,

This is what happens when you dont go to college. You can't piece together information.

 

[Kappo]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because?

That's easy... because the rest of the civilized world says so, and because Iran cannot be trusted with such technology. Their tacit support for Hezbollah is enough to demonstrate Iran's total lack of respect for the lives of innocent civilians throughout the region. The existence of Iranian Suicide Brigades doesn't help much either...

And last, the fact that their President is a fanatical religious nutcase who hopes to hasten the return of the fairy-tale 12th Imam, by any means possible, is just icing on the cake...

U.S supports terrorist. U.S arms terrorist. U.S invades nation. U.S attacks nations.

I cannot name one single thing Iran has done wrong that the U.S hasn't done.

OK, how about France, England, Germany, Spain, or any one of the other civilized nations of the world who ALSO want Iran to stop enriching uranium, and have made that known through unified sanctions and other security resolutions at the UN?

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

Hezbollah is Lebanese. Iran supports it. Iran does not control it. Don't blame Iran for Hezbollah. You want to blame someone for the creation of Hezbollah you go ahead and blame Israel. Israel is the one who invaded your nation. Iran stepped in and saw an opportunity.

you're just as f'n crazy as that Achmedinifuckwad...

"Don't blame the rapist for the rape. You want to blame someone for the rape, you go ahead and blame the whore who got raped. That whore is the one who wore short skirts. The rapist merely saw the lack of underwear and stepped in to take advantage of the opportunity."

wow...

Israel invaded Lebanon. Hezbollah was created to get Israel out of Lebanon.

So yes if Israel did not invaded Lebanon Hezbollah would not have been created,

This is what happens when you dont go to college. You can't piece together information.

Hey now! Not all of us can go for 9 years on mom's dime and work at starbucks!

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Blah Blah Achmedinijad is my Daddy Blah Blah

Try answering my questions, and please leave your 2-year community college diploma on the wall where it belongs... once again:

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Blah Blah Achmedinijad is my Daddy Blah Blah

Try answering my questions, and please leave your 2-year community college diploma on the wall where it belongs... once again:

Iran simply cannot be allowed to obtain nukes. Period. If they continue to try, it will lead to war.

Is that what you want? Do you wish for war between Iran and the rest of the world?!

I did answer your question genius. I posted twice. Why don't you read the first post?

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Nobody is going to attack Iran. If the world was capable of attacking Iran they would have done so already. The world is going to watch Iran obtain nuclear weapons. No I do not want Iran to obtain nuclear weapons but they are going to obtain them.

I think your belief that the world won't act is overly optimistic...

If any nation attacks Iran then Iran will simply cause a major oil disaster and you will be seeing $300/barrel of oil. What world economy is capable of handing that economic disaster? Iranian missiles will take out Saudi, UAE, Kuwait oil facilities. They will take out oil ships and start a disaster. It is impossible for the world to stop Iran from doing this.

So you believe that, if attacked by the US and/or Israel, Iran will lash out and attack several non-participating Arab nations? Interesting... I guess if WWIII is what you want, or the speedy return of the 12th Imam specifically, then doing that would be a good way to guarantee total chaos in the ME and the complete destruction of your own country...

wow.

& quite frankly in the past I would have loved for the world to have started a war with Iran. I am sick and tired of a bunch of fuckfack Islamic shitheads running Iran. I would love to visit Iran and that requires the end to wizard of oz looking leaders. Unfortunately for me my mom is in the green zone. I do not wish to see Iranian rockets raining down on her so right now I have no choice but to wish for peace.

Wait... what?! You want to see Iran get attacked?! Man, you're all over the f'n map...

Just out of curiosity, what is your mom doing in the Green Zone in Iraq?

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: palehorse
Answer this question: Do you advocate doing nothing at all to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? A simple Yes or No will suffice.

I would support "nothing" over an invasion. I would support "nothing" over giving them a bunch of free shit at taxpayer's expense.

That seems to be the only choices. Oh, except for your idea of "something," of which I haven't yet calculated the details.

:roll:

I don't see a logical reason why they shouldn't be allowed to have nukes. Your fear of Iran using them preemptively is insane. And it's the only rationale you have for them not being allowed to have them.

In my above response to Aimster, I believe I spelled out the many reasons something more must be done to prevent Iran from obtaining nukes. As I've also said, I'm all ears for whatever alternatives you have to offer -- that is, besides "doing nothing."

Doing nothing would place Americans, American interests, and several of our allies, in grave peril -- so that is simply not a viable option.

Thankfully, there are much smarter people than you or I who are working on this problem day and night... my prayer is simply that they will find a solution that will not cost lives.

"Grave peril?" How so?

And really, I love it, keep asking what should be done, while offering nothing yourself.

Define "something."

Would you support an invasion of Iran if all other attempts proved failure?

 

[tvarad]

Aimster:

-------------------
"Originally posted by: tvarad
Aimster:

"Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because ?"

Because the world shouldn't deal with the problem AFTER Israel is toast.


Iran is not going to attack Israel.

If you believe so you are part of the phobia wagon.

The only way Iran will attack Israel is if Israel attacks Iran."
----------------------

And Germany would not have invaded Poland in 1939. And Japan would not have attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941. And Germany would not have invaded France in WWII. Yada. Yada. Yada.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Nobody is going to attack Iran. If the world was capable of attacking Iran they would have done so already. The world is going to watch Iran obtain nuclear weapons. No I do not want Iran to obtain nuclear weapons but they are going to obtain them.

I think your belief that the world won't act is overly optimistic...

If any nation attacks Iran then Iran will simply cause a major oil disaster and you will be seeing $300/barrel of oil. What world economy is capable of handing that economic disaster? Iranian missiles will take out Saudi, UAE, Kuwait oil facilities. They will take out oil ships and start a disaster. It is impossible for the world to stop Iran from doing this.

So you believe that, if attacked by the US and/or Israel, Iran will lash out and attack several non-participating Arab nations? Interesting... I guess if WWIII is what you want, or the speedy return of the 12th Imam specifically, then doing that would be a good way to guarantee total chaos in the ME...

wow.

& quite frankly in the past I would have loved for the world to have started a war with Iran. I am sick and tired of a bunch of fuckfack Islamic shitheads running Iran. I would love to visit Iran and that requires the end to wizard of oz looking leaders. Unfortunately for me my mom is in the green zone. I do not wish to see Iranian rockets raining down on her so right now I have no choice but to wish for peace.

Wait... what?! You want to see Iran get attacked?! Man, you're all over the f'n map...

Just out of curiosity, what is your mom doing in the Green Zone in Iraq?

Why wouldn't I want the U.S to attack Iran? I hate the regime of Iran and the only way to get rid of them is by force. Just like the Iraqis who love the U.S for attacking Saddam I would love to the U.S for removing the Ayatollahs. I see nothing wrong with that.

John McCain is the one attending Christians for Israel rally and in those rallies they are welcoming the return of Christ which is basically the same thing as what the Muslims believe in. So if that guy becomes the next leader you can be sure he is going to attack Iran. You going to vote for him?

Those Arab nations will more than likely play a role in the whole thing by allowing the U.S to use their bases and ports. You can't just attack Iran by the air and go home and sleep the next day. Iran will keep launching rockets and artillery at U.S bases. U.S is going to have to send in some kind of land.

My mom has been working for the DOD for years and now she is contracted by the State Department to work for the embassy. She is a civilian. She hasn't left yet but she is leaving in a week.

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: tvarad
Aimster:

-------------------
"Originally posted by: tvarad
Aimster:

"Iran has a right to enrich uranium. You want Iran to give up their right because ?"

Because the world shouldn't deal with the problem AFTER Israel is toast.


Iran is not going to attack Israel.

If you believe so you are part of the phobia wagon.

The only way Iran will attack Israel is if Israel attacks Iran."
----------------------

And Germany would not have invaded Poland in 1939. And Japan would not have attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941. And Germany would not have invaded France in WWII. Yada. Yada. Yada.

Iran wants to attack Israel because??

What they are going to march their troops across Iraq and Jordan into Israel?
Give me a break.

 

[DealMonkey]

I say we let Israel deal with the Iranian problem. We pay them good money (and supply great weapons systems) to act as our proxy in the Middle East, so let's get some mileage out of that. Plus, we have enough problems of our own, being the world police and all, so let's outsource this particular issue.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: bamacre
"Grave peril?" How so?

And really, I love it, keep asking what should be done, while offering nothing yourself.

Define "something."

Would you support an invasion of Iran if all other attempts proved failure?

We're going in circles here. Unlike you, I do not claim to know better, or have any better ideas than those the U.S. and the free world are already trying. Sanctions, security resolutions, strongly worded letters, talks, threats, deals, compromises, etc...

What's left? What hasn't been tried?

I was hoping that you'd surprise me and come up with some yet unheard of peaceful resolution to this mess. But, instead, you've suggested nothing... literally!

and that is simply not a viable solution... doing nothing would lead to catastrophe; as would an invasion. So here we are, with those two truths on the table, and neither one of us has any answers.

The only difference, perhaps, is that I suspect you truly support actually doing nothing... I don't think that you agree that it would lead to catastrophe, do you?

If I'm correct, and that is how you feel, then please tell me what you think will happen, globally, if we were to do absolutely nothing further to stop Iraq from obtaining nukes.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Aimster
Why wouldn't I want the U.S to attack Iran? I hate the regime of Iran and the only way to get rid of them is by force. Just like the Iraqis who love the U.S for attacking Saddam I would love to the U.S for removing the Ayatollahs. I see nothing wrong with that.

I'd much rather see other Iranians take care of that themselves. Do enough of them possess the means and the courage to do so? And, once they're done, will the new government of moderates cease the uranium enrichment immediately?

John McCain is the one attending Christians for Israel rally and in those rallies they are welcoming the return of Christ which is basically the same thing as what the Muslims believe in. So if that guy becomes the next leader you can be sure he is going to attack Iran. You going to vote for him?

No, I'm an Obama supporter, and I do NOT want to see a war with Iran.

Those Arab nations will more than likely play a role in the whole thing by allowing the U.S to use their bases and ports.

Newsflash: The U.S. already has plenty of bases on three sides of Iran.

You can't just attack Iran by the air and go home and sleep the next day. Iran will keep launching rockets and artillery at U.S bases. U.S is going to have to send in some kind of land.

I don't think so. I believe our SOF, USAF, and USN could own them quite handily.

My mom has been working for the DOD for years and now she is contracted by the State Department to work for the embassy. She is a civilian. She hasn't left yet but she is leaving in a week.

Well, I hope she gets home safe.... and I vow not to comment further on your family.

 

[tvarad]

Aimster:


"Iran wants to attack Israel because??"

Go ask Ahmedijimbob

"What they are going to march their troops across Iraq and Jordan into Israel?
Give me a break."

Why would they need such troops when they have Hezbollah doing the pimping for them?

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: tvarad
Aimster:


"Iran wants to attack Israel because??"

Go ask Ahmedijimbob

"What they are going to march their troops across Iraq and Jordan into Israel?
Give me a break."

Why would they need such troops when they have Hezbollah doing the pimping for them?

Is Iran arming Hezbollah with chemical weapons?

& Iran's President does not control Iran's military. He was elected because he said "We need to take money away from the rich Ayatollahs and put them back in the hands of the people". Sounds like he is good friends with the Ayatollahs too. No?

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: palehorse

Originally posted by: Aimster
Why wouldn't I want the U.S to attack Iran? I hate the regime of Iran and the only way to get rid of them is by force. Just like the Iraqis who love the U.S for attacking Saddam I would love to the U.S for removing the Ayatollahs. I see nothing wrong with that.

I'd much rather see other Iranians take care of that themselves. Do enough of them possess the means and the courage to do so? And, once they're done, will the new government of moderates cease the uranium enrichment immediately?

John McCain is the one attending Christians for Israel rally and in those rallies they are welcoming the return of Christ which is basically the same thing as what the Muslims believe in. So if that guy becomes the next leader you can be sure he is going to attack Iran. You going to vote for him?

No, I'm an Obama supporter, and I do NOT want to see a war with Iran.

Those Arab nations will more than likely play a role in the whole thing by allowing the U.S to use their bases and ports.

Newsflash: The U.S. already has plenty of bases on three sides of Iran.

You can't just attack Iran by the air and go home and sleep the next day. Iran will keep launching rockets and artillery at U.S bases. U.S is going to have to send in some kind of land.

I don't think so. I believe our SOF, USAF, and USN could own them quite handily.

My mom has been working for the DOD for years and now she is contracted by the State Department to work for the embassy. She is a civilian. She hasn't left yet but she is leaving in a week.

Well, I hope she gets home safe.... and I vow not to comment further on your family.

Was Israel able to take out Hezbollah's rockets/missiles with their 300+ F-16s (Don't really know the number I assume 300-500)?

How will the U.S stop Iran's inventory?