AGP Price Drop/War?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 3, 2005
136
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?

I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.


More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.

You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?

According to the AnandTech Review:
the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE

far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN

fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN

q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE

SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN

For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.

No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:

Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI

HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV

Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV

Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV

IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV

FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI

CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI

SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV

Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV

For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.

IMO the firingsquad numbers are off. Both AnandTech and Tom's Hardware posted similar numbers, and I would trust them more than firingsquad.

Believe it if you want. Even HardOCP wasn't impressed with the card. $350 for that level of performance is insane.

Oh, now you're just in denial. Even in Toms review the 7800GS comes out on top. They each win 2 and there is a tie. But in in intresting turn of events when soft shadows are turned on in FEAR the 7800GS comes out on top. So, I'll count that as another win. And the cards are running form $299 - $319. Not $350. And since the 7800GS is cheaper then the X850XT PE($392??) and has better features what's insane is the cost of that card.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?

I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.


More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.

You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?

According to the AnandTech Review:
the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE

far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN

fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN

q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE

SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN

For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.

No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:

Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI

HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV

Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV

Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV

IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV

FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI

CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI

SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV

Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV

For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.

IMO the firingsquad numbers are off. Both AnandTech and Tom's Hardware posted similar numbers, and I would trust them more than firingsquad.

Believe it if you want. Even HardOCP wasn't impressed with the card. $350 for that level of performance is insane.

Oh, now you're just in denial. Even in Toms review the 7800GS comes out on top. They each win 2 and there is a tie. But in in intresting turn of events when soft shadows are turned on in FEAR the 7800GS comes out on top. So, I'll count that as another win. And the cards are running form $299 - $319. Not $350. And since the 7800GS is cheaper then the X850XT PE($392??) and has better features what's insane is the cost of that card.

You'd count anything as a win for NV.

You can't count soft shadows as a "win" for NV, especially considering that they are ugly and make the game unplayable in most resolutions.

IMO you can't count SM3 tests as "wins" for NV as they're synthetic and very few games use SM3 anyways.

I'm sure if you customized settings, ATI would win every test. Case in point, if you turn on AA on both cards, ATI wins more tests than without.

As for Tom's:

3DMark03: TIE
3DMark05: ATI WIN
FEAR: ATI WIN
HL2LC: TIE
DOOM3: NV WIN
B&W2: ATI WIN

You call that "splitting the tests"? You have AEG written all over you.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?

I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.


More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.

You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?

According to the AnandTech Review:
the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE

far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN

fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN

q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE

SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN

For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.

No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:

Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI

HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV

Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV

Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV

IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV

FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI

CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI

SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV

Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV

For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.

IMO the firingsquad numbers are off. Both AnandTech and Tom's Hardware posted similar numbers, and I would trust them more than firingsquad.

Believe it if you want. Even HardOCP wasn't impressed with the card. $350 for that level of performance is insane.

Oh, now you're just in denial. Even in Toms review the 7800GS comes out on top. They each win 2 and there is a tie. But in in intresting turn of events when soft shadows are turned on in FEAR the 7800GS comes out on top. So, I'll count that as another win. And the cards are running form $299 - $319. Not $350. And since the 7800GS is cheaper then the X850XT PE($392??) and has better features what's insane is the cost of that card.

You'd count anything as a win for NV.

You can't count soft shadows as a "win" for NV, especially considering that they are ugly and make the game unplayable in most resolutions.

IMO you can't count SM3 tests as "wins" for NV as they're synthetic and very few games use SM3 anyways.

I'm sure if you customized settings, ATI would win every test. Case in point, if you turn on AA on both cards, ATI wins more tests than without.

As for Tom's:

3DMark03: TIE
3DMark05: ATI WIN
FEAR: ATI WIN
HL2LC: TIE
DOOM3: NV WIN
B&W2: ATI WIN

You call that "splitting the tests"? You have AEG written all over you.



But is that little performance boost that the ATI card worth the extra $70 or $80? Hell no!
 

Cygnus X1

Senior member
Sep 5, 2005
812
0
71
Originally posted by: BlingBlingArsch
sell all ur stuff and buy pcie and all ur troubles are over. x850xt pcie for 200 o/

How much could I get for all my stuff in my sig?
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
But is that little performance boost that the ATI card worth the extra $70 or $80? Hell no!

:confused:

English perhaps?

Dude don't be an idiot and avoid the issue just because of a missing word. let me type it out for you a little better so your tiny brain can understand.

Is the ATI X850XT PE worth $70 to $80 more than a 7800GS???


Can you read that? Understand it? Hope so, cause I can't do anything more for you.
 
Jan 3, 2005
136
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?

I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.


More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.

You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?

According to the AnandTech Review:
the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE

far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN

fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN

q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE

SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN

For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.

No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:

Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.

Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:

HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI

HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV

Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV

Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV

IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV

FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI

CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI

SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV

Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV

For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.

IMO the firingsquad numbers are off. Both AnandTech and Tom's Hardware posted similar numbers, and I would trust them more than firingsquad.

Believe it if you want. Even HardOCP wasn't impressed with the card. $350 for that level of performance is insane.

Oh, now you're just in denial. Even in Toms review the 7800GS comes out on top. They each win 2 and there is a tie. But in in intresting turn of events when soft shadows are turned on in FEAR the 7800GS comes out on top. So, I'll count that as another win. And the cards are running form $299 - $319. Not $350. And since the 7800GS is cheaper then the X850XT PE($392??) and has better features what's insane is the cost of that card.

You'd count anything as a win for NV.

You can't count soft shadows as a "win" for NV, especially considering that they are ugly and make the game unplayable in most resolutions.

IMO you can't count SM3 tests as "wins" for NV as they're synthetic and very few games use SM3 anyways.

I'm sure if you customized settings, ATI would win every test. Case in point, if you turn on AA on both cards, ATI wins more tests than without.

As for Tom's:

3DMark03: TIE
3DMark05: ATI WIN
FEAR: ATI WIN
HL2LC: TIE
DOOM3: NV WIN
B&W2: ATI WIN

You call that "splitting the tests"? You have AEG written all over you.

Yeah, ATI wins more. Just barely:

3DMark03: TIE
3DMark05: ATI WIN(198 3DMarks)
FARCRY: ATI WIN(1.47fps)
FEAR SS OFF: ATI WIN(4fps)
FEAR SS ON: NV WIN(6fps)
HL2LC: NV WIN(19.41fps)
DOOM3: NV WIN(15.9fps)
B&W2: ATI WIN(1fps)

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.

 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: JamesDax

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.
from looking at most of the reviews, the GS barely edges out the xt but has a definite advantage with the feature set.

However, you are neglecting the FACT that for the ENTIRE last month you could get an x850xt for $200. i did and i am sure glad i did not wait for the GS.
 
Jan 3, 2005
136
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: JamesDax

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.
from looking at most of the reviews, the GS barely edges out the xt but has a definite advantage with the feature set.

However, you are neglecting the FACT that for the ENTIRE last month you could get an x850xt for $200. i did and i am sure glad i did not wait for the GS.

That was then and this is now. But you did get a great deal on a nice card. Good for you.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: JamesDax

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.
from looking at most of the reviews, the GS barely edges out the xt but has a definite advantage with the feature set.

However, you are neglecting the FACT that for the ENTIRE last month you could get an x850xt for $200. i did and i am sure glad i did not wait for the GS.

That was then and this is now. But you did get a great deal on a nice card. Good for you.

Here's the deal:

- both cards perform around the same
- a week ago the X850XT was $200
- right now the 7800GS is $350

IMO you would have to be crazy to spend almost double for an equally performing part at a LATER DATE. The last time I checked, video cards were the fastest-depreciating component in a system. To pay $350 for what is essentially an X850XT w/ SM3 at this point is insane IMO.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: JamesDax

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.
from looking at most of the reviews, the GS barely edges out the xt but has a definite advantage with the feature set.

However, you are neglecting the FACT that for the ENTIRE last month you could get an x850xt for $200. i did and i am sure glad i did not wait for the GS.

That was then and this is now. But you did get a great deal on a nice card. Good for you.

Here's the deal:

- both cards perform around the same
- a week ago the X850XT was $200
- right now the 7800GS is $350

IMO you would have to be crazy to spend almost double for an equally performing part at a LATER DATE. The last time I checked, video cards were the fastest-depreciating component in a system. To pay $350 for what is essentially an X850XT w/ SM3 at this point is insane IMO.



Here's the REAL deal:

-Yes they perform about the same
-Last week, a year ago...means nothing TODAY!
-7800GS is NOT $350, it's going anywhere from $307 to $329 @ respectable e-tailers (this boggles my mind that you post $350 concidering you posted in my thread about the $307 7800GS @ MWAVE)

We live in the HERE and NOW, not yesterday nor last week! As of now, a 7800GS is $70 to $80 cheaper than an X850XT and performs about the same.

Wait...hold up......are you saying you would rather pay extra for less features?
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: JamesDax

The 7800GS is still the better and cheaper card. But stay in denial if you want to.
from looking at most of the reviews, the GS barely edges out the xt but has a definite advantage with the feature set.

However, you are neglecting the FACT that for the ENTIRE last month you could get an x850xt for $200. i did and i am sure glad i did not wait for the GS.

That was then and this is now. But you did get a great deal on a nice card. Good for you.

Here's the deal:

- both cards perform around the same
- a week ago the X850XT was $200
- right now the 7800GS is $350

IMO you would have to be crazy to spend almost double for an equally performing part at a LATER DATE. The last time I checked, video cards were the fastest-depreciating component in a system. To pay $350 for what is essentially an X850XT w/ SM3 at this point is insane IMO.



Here's the REAL deal:

-Yes they perform about the same
-Last week, a year ago...means nothing TODAY!
-7800GS is NOT $350, it's going anywhere from $307 to $329 @ respectable e-tailers (this boggles my mind that you post $350 concidering you posted in my thread about the $307 7800GS @ MWAVE)

We live in the HERE and NOW, not yesterday nor last week! As of now, a 7800GS is $70 to $80 cheaper than an X850XT and performs about the same.

Wait...hold up......are you saying you would rather pay extra for less features?

No, I'm saying I'd rather pay ~$220 for a 7800GT, and another ~$100 for a quality motherboard. I wouldn't buy either of those cards for anywhere near $300 let alone $330, $350 or whatever.

Actually I'm still using AGP. I would upgrade if the price was right. But for that much coin, it makes more sense to get a new system.

BTW this is the *TRUE* Real Deal, Here and Now, trademarked stamped and sealed, confirmed by HardOCP. :p

While this video card has given us some good performance, I am still left with a bad taste in my mouth. At the suggested $350 price point, I can?t help but think NVIDIA could have opened up another 4 pixel pipes and put this card close to the 7800 GT in terms of performance. I just feel as though that you guys tied to an AGP platform, for whatever reason, deserve a bit more for your money. Obviously card sales of the 7800 GS are not going to erode PCIe sales. Then again maybe NVIDIA is banking on you making the jump to a PCIe motherboard with their chipset on it as well. Sadly, that is what I am going to have to suggest in terms of an upgrade.

/thread * 2
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
But is that little performance boost that the ATI card worth the extra $70 or $80? Hell no!

:confused:

English perhaps?

Dude don't be an idiot and avoid the issue just because of a missing word. let me type it out for you a little better so your tiny brain can understand.

Is the ATI X850XT PE worth $70 to $80 more than a 7800GS???


Can you read that? Understand it? Hope so, cause I can't do anything more for you.

Hey, your sentence was incoherent. It could have gone either way.

As for your question, the answer is no. I actually think that 99% of the X850XT's are gone and discontinued, making them a bad deal now that the sale is over. That said, the 7800GS is one of the worst deals I have ever seen on a new videocard. The people that pimp a card like this make me scratch my head and go "AEG?".
 
Jan 3, 2005
136
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
But is that little performance boost that the ATI card worth the extra $70 or $80? Hell no!

:confused:

English perhaps?

Dude don't be an idiot and avoid the issue just because of a missing word. let me type it out for you a little better so your tiny brain can understand.

Is the ATI X850XT PE worth $70 to $80 more than a 7800GS???


Can you read that? Understand it? Hope so, cause I can't do anything more for you.

Hey, your sentence was incoherent. It could have gone either way.

As for your question, the answer is no. I actually think that 99% of the X850XT's are gone and discontinued, making them a bad deal now that the sale is over. That said, the 7800GS is one of the worst deals I have ever seen on a new videocard. The people that pimp a card like this make me scratch my head and go "AEG?".

Oh my. Imagine charging top dollar for the best card in it's class. What could they be thinking.
 

edplayer

Platinum Member
Sep 13, 2002
2,186
0
0
$200 is the most I would pay for an AGP card. Thought about getting a X850XT from Microcenter but passed since I was generally satisfied with my 9800 Pro. For people who have older cards, the "real deal" agp card remains the 6600GT.

If you want better than that (at a reasonable price), wait for a deal, buy a used videocard, or get a PCI-E motherboard/new videocard
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,043
32,546
146
Circuit City has the 7800GS for $299.99, there goes the $350 argument. Text

I really believe if CC can sell it for 3 bills, that the big e-tailers can undercut that if they so choose. I think it is the clear out the suckers/eager Mcbeavers time, and that the price will hit 260's- $280's in 4-6 weeks tops </prognostication>

Originally posted by: Malladine
So does Newegg, has for several days.
Thanx my fellow primate, I didn't notice that.
 

will889

Golden Member
Sep 15, 2003
1,463
5
81
Originally posted by: edplayer
$200 is the most I would pay for an AGP card. Thought about getting a X850XT from Microcenter but passed since I was generally satisfied with my 9800 Pro. For people who have older cards, the "real deal" agp card remains the 6600GT.

If you want better than that (at a reasonable price), wait for a deal, buy a used videocard, or get a PCI-E motherboard/new videocard


Word.

 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
603
126
At the price the GS is running, people with a 754 or 939 processor I would think would do better to buy a pci-e motherboard and a 7800GT rather then the GS.
 

Malladine

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2003
4,618
0
71
It's $299 now. I bet when i'm ready to upgrade this summer it will be $270 ish. The highest i've paid for a card is $272 for a 9800 non pro 3 years ago. There's my limit :)
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,043
32,546
146
Originally posted by: PingSpike
At the price the GS is running, people with a 754 or 939 processor I would think would do better to buy a pci-e motherboard and a 7800GT rather then the GS.
Agreed. For NW P4 and the XP crowd, a 6800GS or 7800GS is not a bad option given some of the posters situations that are considering them. The X850XT for gaming only, was a great deal for 2 bills, but for everything else the others surpass it easily. Had I still my Barton-M@2.5ghz SoundStorm system, I could drop in a 7800GS, overclock it, and have a competent gamer again. If it turns out you can get good odds on unmasking more of the GPU later, even better. The place where it differs from the X850, is that along with SoundStorm, the 68/7800GS will also make a very nice MCE boxen, particularly if/when the H.264 acceleration shows up. That would make it a usuable system for years to come.

If you are vid card myopic and gaming is the only factor, then the X850 was the best thing going. However, if you want more from your old AGP system, then either nV card becomes more attractive. P4HT crowd is even getting a few bones thrown their way with SMP game opts, so maybe that $200-$300 CPU they bought years back is the best hardware investment they made :) Given the mutlimedia strength of it v. sktA, NW P4HT users, may have the most reason to keep their platform the longest?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Maybe it is me but this 7800GS isnt very interesting for an AGP user like myself. If it was a 20 pipe design then I may bite. But a 16 pipe design for 300 bucks doesnt make sense to me when I can grab a more powerful card for 50 bucks. Granted I would have to get a new MB + CPU but for me when I do these builds, I hope they last more than 12 months. I dont see how this card will last more than 12 months for me with the expected lineup of games coming out this year.

/shrug
 

edplayer

Platinum Member
Sep 13, 2002
2,186
0
0
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Circuit City has the 7800GS for $299.99, there goes the $350 argument. Text

I really believe if CC can sell it for 3 bills, that the big e-tailers can undercut that if they so choose. I think it is the clear out the suckers/eager Mcbeavers time, and that the price will hit 260's- $280's in 4-6 weeks tops </prognostication>

and that is the 430/1300 model (the GS CO)

If Circuit City can sell it for an everyday price of $299, it seems reasonable to be able to find it at least 10% off fairly soon. Maybe even 20% or so if you follow the hot deal forums

just read the Firingsquad article. Very informative. Makes me reconsider upgrading...
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
But is that little performance boost that the ATI card worth the extra $70 or $80? Hell no!

:confused:

English perhaps?

Dude don't be an idiot and avoid the issue just because of a missing word. let me type it out for you a little better so your tiny brain can understand.

Is the ATI X850XT PE worth $70 to $80 more than a 7800GS???


Can you read that? Understand it? Hope so, cause I can't do anything more for you.

Hey, your sentence was incoherent. It could have gone either way.

As for your question, the answer is no. I actually think that 99% of the X850XT's are gone and discontinued, making them a bad deal now that the sale is over. That said, the 7800GS is one of the worst deals I have ever seen on a new videocard. The people that pimp a card like this make me scratch my head and go "AEG?".


So basically anyone who disagrees with the great 'sick kitty' is AEG? DAMN!!!! Where is my new gear AEG???