imported_JamesDax
Member
- Jan 3, 2005
- 136
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: JamesDax
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Malladine
Remains? Do you have a link to benchmarks of the 7800GS beating teh X850XT?Originally posted by: Mloot
Can't say about the 7800GS. If it remains top dog of the AGP litter, it may not come down much at all.
I agree. The X850XT is faster, however it lacks SM3. The 7800GS is not worth more than $200 IMO. It's not much better than my X800Pro, and I paid less than that for it 6 months ago.
More brain deadness. X850XT is not faster.
You're talking about your own dead brain, right? The one that AEG pays to post that crap?
According to the AnandTech Review:.the X850 XTPE is generally faster than the new NVIDIA part
Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:
bf2 - 43 nVidia/39 ATI, 31 nVidia/28 ATI - TIE
far cry - 57 nVidia/71 ATI, 39 nVidia/48 ATI - ATI WIN
fear - 29 nVidia/39 ATI, 13 nVidia/22 ATI - ATI WIN
q4 - 66 nVidia/63 ATI, 35 nVidia/35 ATI - TIE
SC:CT - 27 nVidia/49 ATI, 24 nVidia/40 ATI - ATI WIN
For future reference, if you're gonna flame someone, make sure you know you're right about something.
No, I was refering to your brain deadness. According to Firingsquads review:
Sure there are benchmarks where the X800-series cards outrun it (the most prominent being F.E.A.R.), but the e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock delivers better overall performance. By ?overall? we mean in a wide variety of games and applications, running at or near the top in all of the titles we tested. The X800/X850 cards can?t keep up in titles such as Quake 4, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Serious Sam 2. The e-GeForce 7800 GS CO Superclock also boasts a better feature set than the Radeon cards do, it supports HDR with floating-point blending as well as shader model 3.0. On top of that, you?ve got PureVideo support and transparency AA.
Also, a test summary since you seem to think we'll fall for your crap:
HL2: Nv - 57.5 ATI - 59.6 Win for ATI
HL2 LC: - NV - 36.1 ATI - 32.1 Win for NV
Bf2: NV - 48.7 ATI - 41.2 Win for NV
Quake4: NV - 55.2 ATI - 43.2 Win for NV
IL2: NV - 50.2 ATI - 40.1 Win for NV
FEAR: NV - 28 ATI - 35 Win for ATI
CoD2: NV - 23.4 ATI - 25 Win for ATI
SS2: NV - 39 ATI - 29.8 Win for NV
Far Cry HDR: NV - 36.4 ATI - Oppss the ATI can't do HDR. Win for NV
For future reference, well, just make sure you know what you're talking about.
IMO the firingsquad numbers are off. Both AnandTech and Tom's Hardware posted similar numbers, and I would trust them more than firingsquad.
Believe it if you want. Even HardOCP wasn't impressed with the card. $350 for that level of performance is insane.
Oh, now you're just in denial. Even in Toms review the 7800GS comes out on top. They each win 2 and there is a tie. But in in intresting turn of events when soft shadows are turned on in FEAR the 7800GS comes out on top. So, I'll count that as another win. And the cards are running form $299 - $319. Not $350. And since the 7800GS is cheaper then the X850XT PE($392??) and has better features what's insane is the cost of that card.