Yep, nothing quite says responsible gun ownership like giving guns to 2 year olds.
Lol the smoking gun. They have a bank record for Hunter where address listed is Joe’s home address.
Yup, 1000% this. I didn't stop using my parents address as a permanent address for quite some time because I moved fairly frequently.I saw that was being blasted on crap channels today.
The smoking gun that some dude listed his mailing address, which happened to be his parents house for wire transfers.
You know, the sort of thing you have to resort to post divorce when you don't have a permanent stable residence.
It is amazing that this is being crowed as the greatest catch in history when Trump was found liable in fraud and his businesses revoked. It is literally bizarro world.Following wire transfer instructions carefully should ensure your money goes to the right place. Discover what information is needed for a wire transfer.www.westernunion.com
You literally can put any address. Address has very little utility. Now, if the account numbers matched up with Joe Biden's then we can talk.
When I graduated med school, the school required us to use a stable address. (Ya know, because we are moving for residency). In my case, it was my parent's address.
It's because:It is amazing that this is being crowed as the greatest catch in history when Trump was found liable in fraud and his businesses revoked. It is literally bizarro world.
1) Republicans don't actually care about corruption - they care about winning.
2) Not that this is an excuse but everyone already knows Trump is a criminal so new news to this effect doesn't interest people as much.
They didn’t rule that way, they just decided to hear the case. Given their hostility to any attempt to control gun ownership I wouldn’t be shocked if they did, but they haven’t yet, and this decision came from the 5th circuit, who has pretty frequently been too insane even for this SCOTUS.I mean…SCOTUS literally just ruled that domestic abusers shouldn’t lose the ability to own/purchase firearms. Something about the “originalist intent” of the Constitution not defining any rights protecting women (lol). I guess tax evaders are much more dangerous than wife beaters in the eyes of the law.