• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Discussion Ada/'Lovelace'? Next gen Nvidia gaming architecture speculation

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,842
7,285
136
Well, that is what have been reported, we will know in a few days. It is indeed weird to use full die in the first wave of product launching thus my analysis.

The 2080 (full TU104) and 1080 (full GP104) were exactly that.
 

Zor Prime

Golden Member
Nov 7, 1999
1,043
620
136
Someone needs to focus on efficiency. My 3090 dissipates so much heat I keep its TDP locked anywhere between 50% to 70% and it's usually 50-60. I think I benched it one time at 100% TDP. I had no clue my room would become a sauna. It's seriously impressive how much heat gets thrown ... and it's only going to get worse? Naw, no way. Done been made a fool once, 250w power limit for me going forward. My 2080 was tolerable.
 

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
4,060
9,486
136
Speaking of the 4090... Dang, what a chonker. Those heat pipes though...

1663163883182.png
 

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,279
1,410
136
Speaking of the 4090... Dang, what a chonker. Those heat pipes though...

View attachment 67538
Oookay... Maybe the die has heatspreader this time.
Edit: Copper base plate is actually attached to that thing?
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,348
9,730
136
It is tactical move by nVidia to rename supposedly RTX4070 to RTX4080 12GB especially using full die of AD104. Beside marketing reason, I believe the main reason is to target AMD Navi 32 which happens to have 7680 cores with 12GB GDDR6 192-bit memory support. nVidia knows about the costing disadvantage against RDNA3, thus naming AD104 as 4080 12GB hope to let people believe it is a good value card. My estimated price of RTX4080 12GB would be between $599 to $699, we will see...

-100% NV is doing something fishy here, either as a response to AMD (less likely) or as a method of trying to charge more for a part on the basis of its name to buoy the sales of current gen parts for a less painful discount.

Maybe if it was a 4070 people would expect it to be priced @ $499 or less and it would essentially make the entire 3xxx generation pointless outside of the 3050 (for the poors) and NV would end up with a bunch of shreaking AIBs + retailers stuck with a bucketload of cards they would have to take the mother of all baths on.

As a 4080, people are less likely to scoff at a $699 price point, which means 3090's don't really have to drop too far down on account of their 24G of RAM having some special use case scenarios/epeen points.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,842
7,285
136
Oh this is funny. The 4080 12 GB's TFlops at stock is the exact same as the 3090 Ti (~39.997). That's assuming I did the math right.

I get 48.5 for the 4080 16 GB (+21%) and 82.2 for the 4090 (+105%)

Edit: Yeah I think nVidia is going to need another AD102 cut. Just because that's too big of a performance gap. But later I imagine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ozzy702 and Saylick

maddie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2010
5,158
5,545
136
Speaking of the 4090... Dang, what a chonker. Those heat pipes though...

View attachment 67538
13 pipes. Anyone knows the heat transport capacity of a single pipe?
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,528
2,864
136
Seeing these massive multi-slot cards is cringe inducing to me. Its like going hunting for rabbits with an M1 Abrams tank. I can easily be content with cards a few tiers lower than before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
5,668
768
126
That cooler is enormous, and I bet the custom cards will be even bigger. At some point it would be better to have GPU and vram sockets on the motherboard like CPU/ram instead of these massive video cards hanging out of the board.
 

ModEl4

Member
Oct 14, 2019
71
33
61
Every publication that I saw is saying that 208 means 2.08X the performance of GA102 but it doesn't make sense for me, the other numbers are not a product of comparison, they allegedly inform about AD102 specs.
For me it's more probable to mean 2.08TB/sec effective bandwidth with 96MB cache+GDDR6X or it's just FP16 or tensor FP32 Tflops!
 
Last edited:

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,842
7,285
136
Every publication that I saw is saying that 208 means 2.08X the performance of GA102 but it doesn't make sense for me, the other numbers are not a product of comparison, they allegedly inform about AD102 specs.
For me it's more probable to mean 2.08TB/sec effective bandwidth with 96MB cache+GDDR6X or it's just FP16 or tensor FP32 Tflops!

Ray Tracing cores maybe?

Edit: Or as Reddit claims, it's a real phone number that goes to voicemail. No idea what nVidia plans on using any voicemail responses for.
 
Last edited:

ModEl4

Member
Oct 14, 2019
71
33
61
Ray Tracing cores maybe?

Edit: Or as Reddit claims, it's a real phone number that goes to voicemail. No idea what nVidia plans on using any voicemail responses for.
It doesn't seem to be RT cores imo, all the previous designs had 1 RT core per SM, 208 it doesn't even divide correctly.

But if each RT core can do 6 ray traversals per clock per RT/SM instead of 1 that Turing could and the SM/RT is 144 and the clock 2.4GHz (or 128 and 2.7GHz for example in 4090's case) it gives 208 Gigarays.
But 6 ray traversals per RT core is too excessive I think.
 
Last edited:

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,919
2,708
136
How does 75B transistors in ~625mm² on N5 for Lovelace fit in with Hopper being 80B transistors in 812mm² on N4?
Is there a reason why consumer Ada would be significantly denser than Hopper on a nominally larger node?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DisEnchantment

ModEl4

Member
Oct 14, 2019
71
33
61
How does 75B transistors in ~625mm² on N5 for Lovelace fit in with Hopper being 80B transistors in 812mm² on N4?
Is there a reason why consumer Ada would be significantly denser than Hopper on a nominally larger node?
I have lost count with all these rumors, 600/618/625/629mm² N5/N4.
Regarding process the latest rumor is N5?
 

DisEnchantment

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,777
6,791
136
How does 75B transistors in ~625mm² on N5 for Lovelace fit in with Hopper being 80B transistors in 812mm² on N4?
Yeah this is not making sense, rumored 75.38B/629mm2 is 119 MTr/mm2 when Hopper is around 98MTr/mm2. If at all Lovelace should be below 98 MTr/mm2 (or at least close) if it is supposed to clock higher than H100. Otherwise for that Transistor count, Lovelace needs to be 770 mm2.
A density of 119MTr is approaching cell phone SoC level density and basically means clocks are going to be nerfed.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,842
7,285
136
Yeah this is not making sense, rumored 75.38B/629mm2 is 119 MTr/mm2 when Hopper is around 98MTr/mm2. If at all Lovelace should be below 98 MTr/mm2 (or at least close) if it is supposed to clock higher than H100. Otherwise for that Transistor count, Lovelace needs to be 770 mm2.
A density of 119MTr is approaching cell phone SoC level density and basically means clocks are going to be nerfed.

It's probally the L2 cache.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,842
7,285
136
You know, given the big gap in core counts between AD102 and the others, the die size of the smaller products shouldn't be that bad. AD104 should not be that much bigger than GA106. Maybe even less than 300 mm2 although it's probably a tad above.

Of course who knows how many multiples the N4 wafers cost compared to Samsung's 8 nm...