Well, that is what have been reported, we will know in a few days. It is indeed weird to use full die in the first wave of product launching thus my analysis.
The 2080 (full TU104) and 1080 (full GP104) were exactly that.
Well, that is what have been reported, we will know in a few days. It is indeed weird to use full die in the first wave of product launching thus my analysis.
But not GA102 (3090 and 3080) and GA104(3070).The 2080 (full TU104) and 1080 (full GP104) were exactly that.
But not GA102 (3090 and 3080) and GA104(3070).
Oookay... Maybe the die has heatspreader this time.Speaking of the 4090... Dang, what a chonker. Those heat pipes though...
![]()
Leaked Lenovo GeForce RTX 4090 Legion GPU is a true quad-slot design - VideoCardz.com
Lenovo GeForce RTX 4090 pictured The first photos of Lenovo RTX 4090 GPU. Lenovo is preparing a quad-slot and triple-fan brick also known as RTX 4090 graphics card. While the name of the card has been partially hidden, we can clearly see this is a new design for the cooler. The visible font also...videocardz.com
View attachment 67538
It is tactical move by nVidia to rename supposedly RTX4070 to RTX4080 12GB especially using full die of AD104. Beside marketing reason, I believe the main reason is to target AMD Navi 32 which happens to have 7680 cores with 12GB GDDR6 192-bit memory support. nVidia knows about the costing disadvantage against RDNA3, thus naming AD104 as 4080 12GB hope to let people believe it is a good value card. My estimated price of RTX4080 12GB would be between $599 to $699, we will see...
13 pipes. Anyone knows the heat transport capacity of a single pipe?Speaking of the 4090... Dang, what a chonker. Those heat pipes though...
![]()
Leaked Lenovo GeForce RTX 4090 Legion GPU is a true quad-slot design - VideoCardz.com
Lenovo GeForce RTX 4090 pictured The first photos of Lenovo RTX 4090 GPU. Lenovo is preparing a quad-slot and triple-fan brick also known as RTX 4090 graphics card. While the name of the card has been partially hidden, we can clearly see this is a new design for the cooler. The visible font also...videocardz.com
View attachment 67538
Every publication that I saw is saying that 208 means 2.08X the performance of GA102 but it doesn't make sense for me, the other numbers are not a product of comparison, they allegedly inform about AD102 specs.
For me it's more probable to mean 2.08TB/sec effective bandwidth with 96MB cache+GDDR6X or it's just FP16 or tensor FP32 Tflops!
It doesn't seem to be RT cores imo, all the previous designs had 1 RT core per SM, 208 it doesn't even divide correctly.Ray Tracing cores maybe?
Edit: Or as Reddit claims, it's a real phone number that goes to voicemail. No idea what nVidia plans on using any voicemail responses for.
I have lost count with all these rumors, 600/618/625/629mm² N5/N4.How does 75B transistors in ~625mm² on N5 for Lovelace fit in with Hopper being 80B transistors in 812mm² on N4?
Is there a reason why consumer Ada would be significantly denser than Hopper on a nominally larger node?
Ray Tracing cores maybe?
Edit: Or as Reddit claims, it's a real phone number that goes to voicemail. No idea what nVidia plans on using any voicemail responses for.
Yeah this is not making sense, rumored 75.38B/629mm2 is 119 MTr/mm2 when Hopper is around 98MTr/mm2. If at all Lovelace should be below 98 MTr/mm2 (or at least close) if it is supposed to clock higher than H100. Otherwise for that Transistor count, Lovelace needs to be 770 mm2.How does 75B transistors in ~625mm² on N5 for Lovelace fit in with Hopper being 80B transistors in 812mm² on N4?
Yeah this is not making sense, rumored 75.38B/629mm2 is 119 MTr/mm2 when Hopper is around 98MTr/mm2. If at all Lovelace should be below 98 MTr/mm2 (or at least close) if it is supposed to clock higher than H100. Otherwise for that Transistor count, Lovelace needs to be 770 mm2.
A density of 119MTr is approaching cell phone SoC level density and basically means clocks are going to be nerfed.
Seems like we got a decent guess at the die size of AD102: 629mm2
