• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Discussion Ada/'Lovelace'? Next gen Nvidia gaming architecture speculation

Page 32 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Karnak

Senior member
Jan 5, 2017
400
773
136
There's 5.0 support on their AM5 MB (at least guaranteed for X670E) so I doubt RDNA3 won't feature 5.0.

Still surprised that there is no 5.0 even for AD102.
 

KompuKare

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,230
1,601
136
Wonder what PCIe 5.0 does for power consumption which is already looking poor. Aside from the cost, power might be a good reason to "only" stick with PCIe 4.0.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,497
7,753
136
If the past is any indicator then there's no meaningful performance gain from using the latest version of PCIe. For midrange and lower end cards you'll likely even be able to run 16x PCIe 3 or older and it won't matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leeea

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
4,060
9,486
136
That seems like an expensive murder weapon.

I'm not sure if "has blood on it" is a valid reason to RMA either, so I can't recommend throwing you 4090 at another human being.
Funny enough, if you tried throwing a GPU at someone not even 6 months ago they'd gladly welcome it with open arms. Only so they could hopefully catch it and plug it into their PC to mine with it.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,530
2,106
106
Says the transisitor count is over 75 B. That would be 2.6x+ the number of transistors.

But how efficiently are they used? If it scales as poorly as Ampere, that will increase the price way more than the performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,348
9,730
136
Wonder how much of that increased transistor budget is going into beefy caches vs compute hardware.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,497
7,753
136
Not much point in compute hardware that you can't keep fed. We've already seen that bigger caches can be a smart move, so I think NVidia is wise to recognize a good idea when they see one.

The area trade off for what you'd need to spend on a wider memory bus isn't so unfavorable either. Even if SRAM doesn't scale as well as logic, it scales better than IO.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,843
7,288
136

Videocardz claims they have the specs for the 4090 and the 4080s and also claim that the 4080 12 GB and 16 GB will be released this year, sometime in November.
 

Krteq

Golden Member
May 22, 2015
1,009
729
136
Two RTX 4080 versions each based on different GPUs and with different VRAM capacity? Smells fishy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

Krteq

Golden Member
May 22, 2015
1,009
729
136
So, according to you, $1k for xx80 is justified now because it's not based on xx104 gpu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaluan

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,843
7,288
136
So, according to you, $1k for xx80 is justified now because it's not based on xx104 gpu?

It's a $200 hike if you figure the 3080's real MSRP is $799. It is a much more expensive node.

But that's why there's a 4080 12 GB. People are going to complain about it and this is the "solution".
 

maddie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2010
5,158
5,545
136
So, according to you, $1k for xx80 is justified now because it's not based on xx104 gpu?
Don't worry, prices will soon be a lot lower than assumed. Unfortunately, it won't be for nice reasons.

How does a collapse happen? Slowly at first, then all at once.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,843
7,288
136
Don't worry, prices will soon be a lot lower than assumed. Unfortunately, it won't be for nice reasons.

How does a collapse happen? Slowly at first, then all at once.

It'll be okay. But these are likely going to be the only desktop cards released for some time.
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
866
804
106
It is tactical move by nVidia to rename supposedly RTX4070 to RTX4080 12GB especially using full die of AD104. Beside marketing reason, I believe the main reason is to target AMD Navi 32 which happens to have 7680 cores with 12GB GDDR6 192-bit memory support. nVidia knows about the costing disadvantage against RDNA3, thus naming AD104 as 4080 12GB hope to let people believe it is a good value card. My estimated price of RTX4080 12GB would be between $599 to $699, we will see...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GodisanAtheist

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,843
7,288
136
4070Ti supposedly uses AD103 die with 256-bit memory and normally come much later than 4070 just like 30 series launching

Well, if the 4080 12 GB is AD104 that's obviously not happening. The speculation of the 4070 is a cut AD104, 7168 cores and 160 bit.
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
866
804
106
Well, if the 4080 12 GB is AD104 that's obviously not happening. The speculation of the 4070 is a cut AD104, 7168 cores and 160 bit.
Well, that is what have been reported, we will know in a few days. It is indeed weird to use full die in the first wave of product launching thus my analysis.

Come to think about 4070Ti, nVidia could use AD103 with 12GB 23Gbps GDDR6X memory instead of 16GB in order to up sale 4080 16GB