Yes, obviously.
Didn't you know that Charlie Sheen is the world's premier news source?
Oh wait, that's CNN. Nevermind.
Queasy
Moderator<br>Console Gaming
- Aug 24, 2001
- 31,796
- 2
- 0
I fail to see how laughing at a bunch of conspiracy moonbat loonies is a bananable offense. :roll: But it was nice for you to perform such a cute nesting of a bananable offense.
So...
<deeeeeep breath>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The only 9/11 deniars are members of the United States government. They are denying the truth
If you bothered to read through this thread, there are numerous videos links + eyewitness testimonies that contradict or destroy the official version of events.
The average person is able to discern fact from fantasy. Yet conspiracy theorists seem to be missing this ability. They can be extremely intelligent, yet be completely incapable of discerning reality from fantasy. This is common in schizophrenics.
Since you're wondering, forward this thread to all Canadian government + news agencies. After that, they'll have no excuse as to "not knowing" about it, right?
Yet you're the one unable to realize numerous explosions took place before any "collapsing" began.
Denial.
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since you're wondering, forward this thread to all Canadian government + news agencies. After that, they'll have no excuse as to "not knowing" about it, right?
They're probably tired of answering every stupid question posed to them by every schizophrenic with a conspiracy theory.
Someone becomes a conspiracy theorist and BAM- they're after the government. Has anyone else noticed this pattern of mental illness?
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Since you're wondering, forward this thread to all Canadian government + news agencies. After that, they'll have no excuse as to "not knowing" about it, right?
Has anyone else noticed this pattern of mental illness?
Are you describing your illness of denial?
numerous pre collapse explosions did occur. Fact.
I live in central NJ and know many people who were actually there on the streets when this happened. I don't hear any of them spouting nonsense like like this, but then there's plenty of nuts 3000 miles away in California who claim to know "the truth".
Please don't declare your radical, loony claims to be "fact". There are plenty of professional demolition experts out there who have seen the videos and heard the stories, and if there was evidence like you claim, they'd have instantly seen and cried foul. But they didn't. Why?
I hope you're not saying our firefighters are liars.
http://www.mypetgoat.tv/video/Bomb_Montage.WMV.
Actually, many have cried foul...it's well documented on the web. You haven't done enough homework... they haven't been heard by the general public because the mainstream media refuses to report it
From reading your posts on this and other topics, it is abundantly clear that you're out of touch with reality, have some degree of mental illness, and gravitate towards conspiracy theories. You don't seem to have any particular cause that you believe in, instead you subscribe to the typical "conspiracy theorist" mindset.
You're not addressing the evidence presented of pre collapse explosions. Typical of someone in denial.
So, are you going to address the news reporter / fire fighter testimonies?
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Actually, many have cried foul...it's well documented on the web. You haven't done enough homework... they haven't been heard by the general public because the mainstream media refuses to report it
word
I'm done speaking with the tykes. My work here is done.
Have a great weekend noto12ious!
If there were all these other explosives planted in the bottoms of the buildings designed to take them down, then why did both buildings collapse from the point of the greatest heat from the fires, above where the jets hit? They didn't fall from the bottom, they collapse initiated on the floors where the fire was burning.
That's what an investigation is supposed to uncover. Unfortunately, the 911 commission appointed by the administration is calling YOUR firefighters a bunch of liars, and the government is refusing to acknowledge any explosions took place.
One possibility, the explosions on the lower levels knocked out the central steel columns, and then cutter charges were detonated below the collapse point of the planes, thus forcing the already weakened central support columns to collapse. Who knows really? The government didn't investigate.
Firefighter Louie Cacchioli, who was quoted earlier, testified in 2004 to members of the Commission?s staff. But, he reported, they were so unreceptive that he ended up walking out in anger. ?I felt like I was being put on trial in a court room,? said Cacchioli. ?They were trying to twist my words and make the story fit only what they wanted to hear. All I wanted to do was tell the truth and when they wouldn?t let me do that, I walked out.?58
That Cacchioli?s experience was not atypical is suggested by janitor William Rodriguez, whose testimony was also quoted earlier. Although Rodriguez was invited to the White House as a National Hero for his rescue efforts on 9/11, he was, he said, treated quite differently by the Commission: "I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower.?59
When reading The 9/11 Commission Report, one will not find the name of Cacchioli, or Rodriguez, or anyone else reporting explosions in the towers. It would appear that the Commission deliberately withheld this information, as it apparently did with regard to Able Danger60 and many other things that should have been included in ?the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11.?61
The definitive report about the collapse of the towers was to have been provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). According to Rodriguez, however, this investigative body was equally uninterested in his testimony: ?I contacted NIST . . . four times without a response. Finally, [at a public hearing] I asked them before they came up with their conclusion . . . if they ever considered my statements or the statements of any of the other survivors who heard the explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces.?62
In light of this report of NIST?s response, it is not surprising to find that its final report, which in the course of supporting the official story about the collapses ignores many vital issues,63 makes no mention of reports of explosions and other phenomena suggestive of controlled demolition.
source: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter