While women do need to know how to protect themselves, it is NOT ever the victim's fault nor is it ok to insinuate it is her (or on occasion his) fault. Parents not properly teaching their sons to respect women is the problem here. These college age young men thinking women don't get a choice in the matter or deciding that if she's too drunk or too passed out to say no then it's not rape are a problem.
Always reduce your fractions!
I think we have a problem of how to put our feelings into words here. A rape victim never deserves to be raped, and the punishment to the rapist should not depend on the victim and the victims actions. That being said, the victim could have done things that made the situation more likely.
We put rape into a category where the victim can never be blamed for any sort of fault. If we were to look at other things where someone was say flashing money around, we would still feel bad for the person who gets robbed, but most if not all would say that the person was being reckless.
I think the issue here is that most people see rape as so terrible that any sliver of guilt is so outweighed by the perp, that blaming the victim seems almost pointless.
I would say the victim of rape is in a strange moral position. I don't believe rape is ever acceptable, but, I do think that some situations people put themselves in make rape more likely.
Does rape require someone to willingly choose to do something? If a man and woman get equally drunk, undress and she passes out, and he blacks out and puts his limp penis in her mouth, is it rape?
In cases of murder, we have manslaughter, which does not imply intent, but the person was so reckless that they are held responsible.
Its very tricky and I really hate how some people try to make it black and white.