A Possible Explanation for Trump's Pandemic Response

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,443
4,139
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,522
17,030
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.

Close!


Most troubling of all, perhaps, was a sentiment the expert said a member of Kushner’s team expressed: that because the virus had hit blue states hardest, a national plan was unnecessary and would not make sense politically. “The political folks believed that because it was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy,” said the expert.

You can believe this insider or you can believe the White House.
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,710
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.
I'm not so sure about that, that information wasn't available when trump first could have acted and really wasn't well know until recently.
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
21,003
16,248
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.

It would be a very clumsy way of doing it; consider many Republican voters will have been killed in the process.

Overall I'm puzzled by Trump's inaction. IMO a better direction for him to have taken would be to follow scientific advice but appearing to be spurning it in dramatic yet scientifically minimal ways, and find other ways to 'own the libs' that don't put lives in danger but can be used as flag-waving material by the small-minded who feel that 'owning the libs' is somehow important.

Instead we seem to have 'how many potential voters can we let die before the election'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,443
4,139
136
I'm not so sure about that, that information wasn't available when trump first could have acted and really wasn't well know until recently.

Well, first he called it a "hoax".

And then, when the information DID become available, he slowed down the testing. Sounds to me like he was just taking advantage of good fortune (?) And now that he does know, he's doing even more to obstruct testing.

At least until he's reduced the numbers to what he considers acceptable.

It would be a very clumsy way of doing it; consider many Republican voters will have been killed in the process.

Overall I'm puzzled by Trump's inaction. IMO a better direction for him to have taken would be to follow scientific advice but appearing to be spurning it in dramatic yet scientifically minimal ways, and find other ways to 'own the libs' that don't put lives in danger but can be used as flag-waving material by the small-minded who feel that 'owning the libs' is somehow important.

Instead we seem to have 'how many potential voters can we let die before the election'.

I'm pretty sure, he's not all that concerned about blacks, browns, and "poor white trash". Out of 180,000 people, it's somewhat ironic that only one rich person that he knows of has died.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,201
15,605
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.
That might have been the idea... but guess who shows up to vote now? I am guessing that was a losing bet... pot odds alone would mean a certain fold from me. Stupid play.
Consider the spread of it to whites too? 60+ whites with a shit ton of preexisting conditions, his rock steady base, DEAD to the virus... just to target some blacks? Extremely stupid. So yea he probably did that.
 
Last edited:

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,680
46,398
136
The idea that Trump cares about anybody besides himself is farfetched to say the least. That the disease kills more black and brown people is just a nice bonus to him and his admin not something they set out to make happen.
 

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,443
4,139
136
The idea that Trump cares about anybody besides himself is farfetched to say the least. That the disease kills more black and brown people is just a nice bonus to him and his admin not something they set out to make happen.

I'm not saying that anyone set out to make it happen. I don't think anybody in this administration is smart enough to design that. What I am saying is, he could sit on his hands, and simply "let nature take it's course", until he feels an acceptable number has been reached.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,335
5,487
136
Well if this was the original idea, it failed. For every person that died, it’s turned another 5 family members to despise him and will turn out to vote him out.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
Something occurred to me a couple days ago, I've been hesitant to mention it, because of the implications. People that live in states with legal hunting are familiar with the word "cull". It means to control the numbers of a given population.

Since Covid affects people of color disproportionately, has anyone considered the possibility that Trump might be using the coronavirus to cull a certain segment of the population with his response to it?

If we take a historical perspective, let's say there was a disease that affected Jews disproportionately. If Hitler knew that, and failed to act on it, would he still be guilty of genocide? If the answer is yes, then all Trump is doing, is saving money on ovens.

There's a more moderate version, where it wasn't a calculated, conscious plan to do that, but his racism could nevertheless be a factor in his not being motivated to take active measures to prevent it happening.

I think mainly though, he's just out of his depth. He's not up to the job, is all.
 

DarthKyrie

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2016
1,617
1,395
146
Well if this was the original idea, it failed. For every person that died, it’s turned another 5 family members to despise him and will turn out to vote him out.

I wouldn't count on his supporters backing out on him over the death of some relatives from a fake virus that was created to make the God-Emporer look bad. I know someone that is an example of this, except it didn't kill his family, he has a friend who is a nurse that has told him the horror stories of people she has treated for it and he still thinks this is all blown out of proportion by the Demonrats to make his God-Emporer look bad.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,965
55,357
136
To me the most likely reason is that fighting a pandemic takes sustained, meticulous effort over a long period of time and Trump is literally psychologically incapable of doing that. He tried doing the right thing briefly and then his mental processes broke down so he looked for people to fight instead.

He’s evil but he’s also so mentally ill that things like this are just way beyond his ability to do even in the best of circumstances.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,965
55,357
136
Slowly but surely Europe is losing control of the virus.
America was just bigger, better, and faster. We won the race. Rest of the planet will catch up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53954562
Coronavirus: France sees 'exponential rise' in cases

Got any conspiracy theories of who France is culling?
The vast majority of the planet will never catch up or even come remotely close.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
Slowly but surely Europe is losing control of the virus.
America was just bigger, better, and faster. We won the race. Rest of the planet will catch up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53954562
Coronavirus: France sees 'exponential rise' in cases

Got any conspiracy theories of who France is culling?

Doesn't have to be a conspiracy - France has its racism also, as do most countries. That could partly explain a lack of sufficient effort to do what's needed. But with Trump I believe it's mostly just plain incompetence. And while infections are going up again in France, they did at least come right down for a while first - which is more than the US has achieved.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
I mean, the man is a prisoner of his manifold psychological problems. He is crippled by them and thus just incapable of doing the job Americans idiotically gave him.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,780
10,078
136
I mean, the man is a prisoner of his manifold psychological problems. He is crippled by them and thus just incapable of doing the job Americans idiotically gave him.

Having granted all that, and setting it aside...

What is that job exactly, as it relates to COVID? What sort of actions would an Obama, Bush, or Biden have taken - that would have made a difference in number of COVID deaths? Biggest problem that comes to mind is a complete lack of leadership at the federal level. States have had to fend for themselves, thus fight among themselves in a scattered, disorganized, and ultimately harmful manner. I am lost as to how to attribute deaths to that though. What sort of impact that has had.

Another impact would be a dithering or even antithetical message with regards to protections. Cheer leading Conservative madness against PPE and other measures may be more easily attributed to actual harm. But those are also grass roots movements among the base. Trump's fault is in either falling for the misinformation - or not clamping down to help stop it. But simply doing what Conservatives want... sounds more like a "Having a Republican President" problem, rather than something that is uniquely Trump. OTOH, I cannot imagine Bush being this stupid or ignorant. I think he would have advocated for PPE and other effective measures.

Even then, it is difficult to imagine how much we have lost as a result of this. How can one parse it out?

To understand how badly America has handled COVID, it cannot just be my current knowledge of raw infections and deaths. I need a by-the-numbers review of other nations with statistics and descriptions of actions they took to achieve their results. Actions we did not take, and should have.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
Far too much planning required for President Lazy-Boy.
The simple answer is likely the correct answer, the President is too lazy and doesn't like to attend intel briefings and doesn't admit being wrong on anything ever.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,066
12,285
136
To me the most likely reason is that fighting a pandemic takes sustained, meticulous effort over a long period of time and Trump is literally psychologically incapable of doing that. He tried doing the right thing briefly and then his mental processes broke down so he looked for people to fight instead.

He’s evil but he’s also so mentally ill that things like this are just way beyond his ability to do even in the best of circumstances.
Way too much real work. When are people going to wake up. This is beyond his capabilities. End of story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muse