wait wait wait.
so you are saying 71% of the United States population, aprox 220,266,195 people support the burning of the koran?
surely you have proof to support such a radical claim.
Sure, some of that 220.3 million support the koran burining, but not all of them.
secondly, This WHOLE issue has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the law.
71% of the population isnt denying the law. 71% are saying it is INSULTING to have the mosque there.
There is a VERY CLEAR difference here.
I for example am proud to live in a country that has laws to protect religion, but do not obviously support the mosque being built there.
Lets not forget where the name CORDOBA comes from.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park51#Politicians
You want to build something named after a conquest of your enemies on a territory where YOUR extremists killed thousands.
How about I call a Mass Koran burning event a
Splash. it is known around the world as such, but then I say:
"Hey, we are going to make a splash zone right here, but no everyone this is to show our tolerance of islam."
Also, I have to make note here, that you keep talking about warren street mosque. and how its a ground zero mosque etc.
two differences here.
warren street is a full 2 blocks further away than this proposed mosque AND is less obvious (in the sense of how big it is etc)
the proposed mosque is 100 million dollar project to makea huge building while the other was in a conspicuous location.
I dont hear the leaders of this small mosque calling for shariah law in the US or supporting hamas, two things this imam is calling for.