8GB VRAM not enough (and 10 / 12)

Page 34 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
This thread was started in mid 2021 and is being retired/locked. As the OP is no longer active, or updating and maintaining it.

Mod DAPUNISHER


8GB

Horizon Forbidden West 3060 is faster than the 2080 Super despite the former usually competing with the 2070. Also 3060 has a better 1% low than 4060 and 4060Ti 8GB.
pFJi8XrGZfYuvhvk4952je-970-80.png.webp
Resident Evil Village 3060TI/3070 tanks at 4K and is slower than the 3060/6700XT when ray tracing:
RE.jpg
Company Of Heroes 3060 has a higher minimum than the 3070TI:
CH.jpg

10GB / 12GB

Reasons why still shipping 8GB since 2014 isn't NV's fault.
  1. It's the player's fault.
  2. It's the reviewer's fault.
  3. It's the developer's fault.
  4. It's AMD's fault.
  5. It's the game's fault.
  6. It's the driver's fault.
  7. It's a system configuration issue.
  8. Wrong settings were tested.
  9. Wrong area was tested.
  10. Wrong games were tested.
  11. 4K is irrelevant.
  12. Texture quality is irrelevant as long as it matches a console's.
  13. Detail levels are irrelevant as long as they match a console's.
  14. There's no reason a game should use more than 8GB, because a random forum user said so.
  15. It's completely acceptable for the more expensive 3070/3070TI/3080 to turn down settings while the cheaper 3060/6700XT has no issue.
  16. It's an anomaly.
  17. It's a console port.
  18. It's a conspiracy against NV.
  19. 8GB cards aren't meant for 4K / 1440p / 1080p / 720p gaming.
  20. It's completely acceptable to disable ray tracing on NV while AMD has no issue.
  21. Polls, hardware market share, and game title count are evidence 8GB is enough, but are totally ignored when they don't suit the ray tracing agenda.
According to some people here, 8GB is neeeevaaaaah NV's fault and objective evidence "doesn't count" because of reasons(tm). If you have others please let me know and I'll add them to the list. Cheers!

 
Last edited by a moderator:

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,919
2,708
136
How would the 16GB 4060 Ti work? Are 4GB modules available in quantity now or would they have clamshell boards already designed and ready to go?
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,828
7,277
136
How would the 16GB 4060 Ti work? Are 4GB modules available in quantity now or would they have clamshell boards already designed and ready to go?

They probably did the clamshell board work for an as-of-yet released Quadro.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,530
2,106
106
How would the 16GB 4060 Ti work? Are 4GB modules available in quantity now or would they have clamshell boards already designed and ready to go?
As far as I know, no 4 GB modules exist. So it must be clamshell.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
The 8GB new-bois-on-the-block are coming May 24th & 25th.


RX7600 in-store.


They're saying $249 for that one, which if true, is a reasonable price for 8GB in this current climate. Assuming it also performs decently.
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,050
6,773
136
The 8GB new-bois-on-the-block are coming May 24th & 25th.


RX7600 in-store.


They're saying $249 for that one, which if true, is a reasonable price for 8GB in this current climate. Assuming it also performs decently.

I'm guessing it turns out to be $299. The 8GB RX 480 was $240 7 years ago. I imagine they will price it higher.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NTMBK

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
Is there a point to these cards?

Sure, the NV ones have "NV Premium" features, but AMD? Polaris even has FSR, no? (2.x too?)

What's the point of buying a 7600XT, over say, a $65 RX 580 re-mfg. if the REAL bottleneck is strictly the amount of VRAM anyways, and RT still won't be a thing with AMD RDNA3 even.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,036
32,524
146
I'm guessing it turns out to be $299. The 8GB RX 480 was $240 7 years ago. I imagine they will price it higher.
It will sit on shelves at that price. 6700 has 2GB on it, and will lose in what? performance per watt and ray tracing? AV1 encoding won't move the meter for most shoppers.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,686
4,345
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Is there a point to these cards?

Sure, the NV ones have "NV Premium" features, but AMD? Polaris even has FSR, no? (2.x too?)

What's the point of buying a 7600XT, over say, a $65 RX 580 re-mfg.

People like new cards. So do the Microcenter and the IBUYPowers of the world. These should be faster and fully DX12 Ultimate compliant which also has a little value.


Personally, I think the real deal hunters find $100 6600s to buy but what do I know? ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: VirtualLarry

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,036
32,524
146
Is there a point to these cards?

Sure, the NV ones have "NV Premium" features, but AMD? Polaris even has FSR, no? (2.x too?)

What's the point of buying a 7600XT, over say, a $65 RX 580 re-mfg. if the REAL bottleneck is strictly the amount of VRAM anyways.
AV1 encode and decode. Ray tracing. Considerably longer official driver support. much better performance per watt. Which also means less heat. Superior DP and HDMI. Noise suppression. Not certain what else. Polaris is sucking more than it should in Dead Island 2. That's a big red flag for me. It says it's getting ready to fall off the cliff.

$65 is a fair price, but it is for a very good reason. Polaris is super old in tech world dog years.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,587
10,225
126
I dunno. The first ITX sized card with 8GB GDDR5 or GDDR6, that works in a 75-watt (slot-powered) TBP envelope, has some of my money.

Until then, GPU makers are just re-inventing the (8GB VRAM, 2048 shaders) Wheel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranulf

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
I must agree that RTX 4060Ti 16GB looks pretty interesting.
I think we can agree, that It will be based on AD106 and hopefully It's the full 4608 Cuda cores version.

For comparison:
Screenshot_1.png
Screenshot_2.png
This is the mobile RTX 4070(cutdown full AD106) with 140W TDP, but clockspeed is limited to 2180 MHz, which is achievable at 100W TDP.
TimeSpy Graphic score of 11683 is comparable to RTX 3080 Laptop, which is the uncut GA104 at 165W.

Desktop version should clock easily at 2615MHz(+20%). OC-ing to 2.9GHz would mean 33% higher frequency.
I think desktop AD106 should end up with similar performance to 3070Ti or a bit higher.

Ad106 is a very small chip(<200mm2), so $449 shouldn't be impossible for this 16GB version, but I am more inclined It will cost $499, and It will provide 85% of 4070's performance.

edit: I just noticed I made a mistake. RTX 4070 is the full AD106 chip.
 
Last edited:

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,530
2,106
106
I think desktop AD106 should end up with similar performance to 3070Ti or a bit higher.
I think that this is a fairly obvious target anyway, when the 4070 performs near identical to the 3080. I actually expect them to tweak the clock speeds so it doesn't go faster than the 3070 Ti.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,919
2,708
136
Yeah I have no problem with used gear but the large majority of consumers aren't going to be buying used GPUs from China regardless of price. I'd pay more for a local name brand used card I can have in hand before money is handed over than I would for random "remanufactured" 580's from China that failed out of large scale mining farms. :p
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,050
6,773
136
Yeah I have no problem with used gear but the large majority of consumers aren't going to be buying used GPUs from China regardless of price. I'd pay more for a local name brand used card I can have in hand before money is handed over than I would for random "remanufactured" 580's from China that failed out of large scale mining farms. :p

I used to buy used stuff every now and then but not for awhile. There just don't seem to be as many deals out there.
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
I think that this is a fairly obvious target anyway, when the 4070 performs near identical to the 3080. I actually expect them to tweak the clock speeds so it doesn't go faster than the 3070 Ti.
That's not a bad performance from a GPU with only 128-bit Vram If you ask me.
It's kinda funny how in laptops RTX 4070 is the worst option, yet in desktop with 16GB Vram option and acceptable price could be one of the best choices this generation.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,036
32,524
146
That's assuming the 6700 stays in stock.
Practically speaking, they will probably both be dust collectors. 12GB models of the 3060 and 6700XT have been dropping to near the $300 mark recently.

The speculation is that the 4060ti can have 16GB because it won't cannibalize sales of more expensive cards with that much vram, used for workflows. That makes sense I suppose.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,696
12,373
136
First card to hit $199 will probably get my money for an upgrade to the kids’ computer. They have a 1060 with 6 GB VRAM right now but they are young enough that nothing they play is very demanding so I’m not too worried about the 8 GB just yet.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,496
7,752
136
I'd just hang on to the 1060 for another generation. Wait until you can get at least 12 GB for an upgrade. If AMD put v-cache infinity cache on any of their future APUs that would probably be a significant upgrade over a 1060 for less money overall.
 
  • Love
Reactions: VirtualLarry

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,957
7,666
136
The 8GB new-bois-on-the-block are coming May 24th & 25th.


RX7600 in-store.


They're saying $249 for that one, which if true, is a reasonable price for 8GB in this current climate. Assuming it also performs decently.
$249 wouldn't be terrible for 6650 XT performance with ~15W lower power consumption. Not great but a lot better than the rumored $330 which would have been horrible. God if Nvidia thinks they're getting $400 for an 8GB card in 2023 though. At $330 a 4060 Ti with 3070 Ti performance would be a hot seller, maybe even $350 would be defensible.
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,050
6,773
136
$249 wouldn't be terrible for 6650 XT performance with ~15W lower power consumption. Not great but a lot better than the rumored $330 which would have been horrible. God if Nvidia thinks they're getting $400 for an 8GB card in 2023 though. At $330 a 4060 Ti with 3070 Ti performance would be a hot seller, maybe even $350 would be defensible.

How can they have a $330 4060 Ti when the next model up the stack would cost almost double at $600? That is way to large of a gap, so I expect $400.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Ranulf

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,957
7,666
136
Practically speaking, they will probably both be dust collectors. 12GB models of the 3060 and 6700XT have been dropping to near the $300 mark recently.

The speculation is that the 4060ti can have 16GB because it won't cannibalize sales of more expensive cards with that much vram, used for workflows. That makes sense I suppose.
Makes sense on the 4060 Ti. Haven't really seen 6700 XT dropping so much in price lately though. Four months ago was the best time to buy one when they'd be $310 all the time, sometimes even 6750 XT. Wondering if stocks are starting to get low on the 6700 XT and 6750 XT since the deals now seem to come around every week or so for $350.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,957
7,666
136
How can they have a $330 4060 Ti when the next model up the stack would cost almost double at $600? That is way to large of a gap, so I expect $400.
Not like the 4070 is selling well. Besides, I was talking about defensible prices that would excite people into buying, not prices to keep the 4060 Ti in line with the rest of the price gouged lineup.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.