8GB VRAM not enough (and 10 / 12)

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
8GB
Horizon Forbidden West 3060 is faster than the 2080 Super despite the former usually competing with the 2070. Also 3060 has a better 1% low than 4060 and 4060Ti 8GB.
pFJi8XrGZfYuvhvk4952je-970-80.png.webp
Resident Evil Village 3060TI/3070 tanks at 4K and is slower than the 3060/6700XT when ray tracing:
RE.jpg
Company Of Heroes 3060 has a higher minimum than the 3070TI:
CH.jpg

10GB / 12GB

Reasons why still shipping 8GB since 2014 isn't NV's fault.
  1. It's the player's fault.
  2. It's the reviewer's fault.
  3. It's the developer's fault.
  4. It's AMD's fault.
  5. It's the game's fault.
  6. It's the driver's fault.
  7. It's a system configuration issue.
  8. Wrong settings were tested.
  9. Wrong area was tested.
  10. Wrong games were tested.
  11. 4K is irrelevant.
  12. Texture quality is irrelevant as long as it matches a console's.
  13. Detail levels are irrelevant as long as they match a console's.
  14. There's no reason a game should use more than 8GB, because a random forum user said so.
  15. It's completely acceptable for the more expensive 3070/3070TI/3080 to turn down settings while the cheaper 3060/6700XT has no issue.
  16. It's an anomaly.
  17. It's a console port.
  18. It's a conspiracy against NV.
  19. 8GB cards aren't meant for 4K / 1440p / 1080p / 720p gaming.
  20. It's completely acceptable to disable ray tracing on NV while AMD has no issue.
  21. Polls, hardware market share, and game title count are evidence 8GB is enough, but are totally ignored when they don't suit the ray tracing agenda.
According to some people here, 8GB is neeeevaaaaah NV's fault and objective evidence "doesn't count" because of reasons(tm). If you have others please let me know and I'll add them to the list. Cheers!
 
Last edited:

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
Here we are bois, I called it a few pages back, DLSS "4.0" for super-duper texture upscaling:


Now you too can upscale textures on top of upscaled frames on top of upscaled pixels, all for the low, low, price of $400. o_O

Coming up next: DLSS 5.0 NPC upscaling. Only one real enemy is rendered with correct behaviour at a time, while the "aye eye" makes up the rest.

Maybe Dee El Ess Ess 6.0 can be bullets and gibs(tm). One real bullet, with the rest inferred by the "new rail" network.
 
Last edited:

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
Millions, if not billions, will go down the drain in the next few years as uninformed clueless gamers drop their hard earned cash on the cheaper cards with 8 GB.
It's even worse with Windows 11 and the whole TPM thing. Colossal amounts of senseless e-waste.

But...but...but Microsoft cares deeply about carbon emissions, climate change, and the environment, yo!
 
Last edited:

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,067
3,574
126
I expect by DLSS10 you’ll just load up a blank room and then turn on DLSS to generate the actual game.

DLSS10 is supposedly going outside...

Capture.JPG

But i heard the games and content that support it is horrible...
Oh but at least it doesn't require 0-day patches like everything else lately, and your sort of cap'd at 60fps with no way to disable vsync.
 

psolord

Platinum Member
Sep 16, 2009
2,142
1,265
136
Here we are bois, I called it a few pages back, DLSS "4.0" for super-duper texture upscaling:


Now you too can upscale textures on top of upscaled frames on top of upscaled pixels, all for the low, low, price of $400. o_O

Coming up next: DLSS 5.0 NPC upscaling. Only one real enemy is rendered with correct behaviour at a time, while the "aye eye" makes up the rest.

Maybe Dee El Ess Ess 6.0 can be bullets and gibs(tm). One real bullet, with the rest inferred by the "new rail" network.

Hey I called it too! I mean thereabouts, concerning memory. xD

 
Jul 27, 2020
28,175
19,192
146
I see a future where you download maybe a gigabyte of encrypted source and instructions to generate textures, animations, maps and other assets of the game, including the engine. Then you get your free copy of Unreal Engine compiler (could be several hundred gigs) on the job, taking a few days or even up to a week, working 24/7 to generate everything at your required quality level. 1080p would be about 100GB, 1440p about 200GB and 4K should be less than 500GB. Flagship cards will offer accelerated AI generation of these assets.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,003
126
16GB 4060TI rumor:


I'm calling it now. If this thing is released, within ~18 months it'll be faster than the 4070/4070TI/3080TI in some situations.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,686
4,345
136
www.teamjuchems.com
16GB 4060TI rumor:


I'm calling it now. If this thing is released, within ~18 months it'll be faster than the 4070/4070TI/3080TI in some situations.

Easily. 3060 proved this vs the 3070, etc.

The “announced in May, delivered in July” bit smells like a late date “whoops” decision when they realized how DOA the 8GB card will be except with their most ardent mouthpieces. Feels like about 90 days to decision to shelves, with about 40 days of that being shipping logistics. That likely means the 16GB was planned as a possible sku all along and just got pulled into being now.

If it’s available and priced at a sane level (a full step below the 4070, interpret that as you will), I think the 4060ti 16GB will be a prime Nvidia card to get. Then skip all the way to the 4080. IMO, same as the previous generation. The 4070 will once again be in a weird spot, even weirder than the 3xxx series where only the non-ti 3060 existed.

Will we see a 24GB 4070/4070ti? Or is that the 5070 refresh carrot?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
4,053
9,476
136
How fast can a 4060 Ti be? The 4070 tied the 3080 in 1080p/1440p (loses in 4K) but with the 4060 Ti being 25% cutdown from the 4070, I cannot imagine it being faster than the RX 6800. If we then talk about price, a used RX6800 can be found for under $400. Meanwhile, it sounds like the 16 GB version of the 4060 Ti will be over $500. You'd be buying something slower for more money, just to save 50W of power (RX6800 can do 200W easily) and to gain access to DLSS3?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and KompuKare

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,032
32,508
146
How fast can a 4060 Ti be? The 4070 tied the 3080 in 1080p/1440p (loses in 4K) but with the 4060 Ti being 25% cutdown from the 4070, I cannot imagine it being faster than the RX 6800. If we then talk about price, a used RX6800 can be found for under $400. Meanwhile, it sounds like the 16 GB version of the 4060 Ti will be over $500. You'd be buying something slower for more money, just to save 50W of power (RX6800 can do 200W easily) and to gain access to DLSS3?
Comparing used to new is no bueno for many of us. One is a dice roll, the other is fully back for 2yrs or more and never been ragged out for months or years mining crypto.

Best ray tracing and upscaling, with frame generation, NVENC, Broadcast, best A.I. features, superior VR compatibility, all add value too. Nvidia is killing it at selling software supported by the hardware at this point. If you are doing anything but raster gaming, AMD is truly second rate in most categories. A $500-$550 card that has all that, is 160W, may be a killer overclocker, could have true 2 slot models, and a single power connector? AMD has a lot of wood to chop to compete with that.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,819
7,259
136
Comparing used to new is no bueno for many of us. One is a dice roll, the other is fully back for 2yrs or more and never been ragged out for months or years mining crypto.

It is true that the 6950 XT has been $599 and the 6800 XT's been under $500. That's new prices not used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ajay and Tlh97

Saylick

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2012
4,053
9,476
136
Comparing used to new is no bueno for many of us. One is a dice roll, the other is fully back for 2yrs or more and never been ragged out for months or years mining crypto.

Best ray tracing and upscaling, with frame generation, NVENC, Broadcast, best A.I. features, superior VR compatibility, all add value too. Nvidia is killing it at selling software supported by the hardware at this point. If you are doing anything but raster gaming, AMD is truly second rate in most categories. A $500-$550 card that has all that, is 160W, may be a killer overclocker, could have true 2 slot models, and a single power connector? AMD has a lot of wood to chop to compete with that.
Fair enough, comparing used vs new isn't apples to apples.

I still think that 3070/3070 Ti performance some 2.5 years later for $550 because it has 16 GB RAM, 50% better perf/W, and DLSS3 seems kind of lack luster in terms of improvement over time. All of the other features you mentioned are available on the 3070/3070 Ti as well, i.e. driver support, VR compatibility, 2-slot cooler.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,032
32,508
146
Fair enough, comparing used vs new isn't apples to apples.

I still think that 3070/3070 Ti performance some 2.5 years later for $550 because it has 16 GB RAM, 50% better perf/W, and DLSS3 seems kind of lack luster in terms of improvement over time. All of the other features you mentioned are available on the 3070/3070 Ti as well, i.e. driver support, VR compatibility, 2-slot cooler.
You were comparing it to the 6800, so all of those features I listed were necessary. Gen on gen it's still a good advancement IMO. Twice the ram is a giant win in the price range. Particularly when you consider how much Nvidia prefers to extort for extra ram. The 4070 flopping has sent the message?

And as an almost exclusive single player gamer, frame generation is intriguing. If it works as advertised, and I haven't been gaslit, I would use it in every supporting game. Twice the ram and FG then leaves an 8GB 3070 series card in the dust. DLAA is something I didn't list that is also extremely attractive to me. Seriously, the software features are damned impressive.
 

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
4,042
6,759
136
Comparing used to new is no bueno for many of us. One is a dice roll, the other is fully back for 2yrs or more and never been ragged out for months or years mining crypto.

Best ray tracing and upscaling, with frame generation, NVENC, Broadcast, best A.I. features, superior VR compatibility, all add value too. Nvidia is killing it at selling software supported by the hardware at this point. If you are doing anything but raster gaming, AMD is truly second rate in most categories. A $500-$550 card that has all that, is 160W, may be a killer overclocker, could have true 2 slot models, and a single power connector? AMD has a lot of wood to chop to compete with that.

It would still be bandwidth starved. How much that matters we have yet to see.