Originally posted by: TheRedUnderURBed
Originally posted by: Mursilis
I fail to see the evil in gentrification. Real estate in any city is usually prime real estate, and the poor have no more right to it than the rich.
Think about what you said for a minute, how would this be possible if one has more money then the other? Your statement is false. The working class have no choice but to be uprooted.
I would rather not get into a debate of fairness where I could go into a whole tangent but what you say makes no sense in reality. The core taxpaying working class are screwed. And the issue is a whole lot more complicated then it seems on the surface considering developers and urban planners and zoning have no interest in a working,functional city, just making more money for themselves.
We have not seen the obvious negative aspects of gentrification yet as a whole. But it is taking its toll in small ways so far already. (culture, upward mobility etc.)
I am glad to see many old building renovated which were decayed husks in the 80s, but at the same time is it worth losing the soul of the city, and the working class that built it?
Ponder that if you will. I do often being a urban dweller.
I loved the seedy side of NYC, it felt real, and it was fun, exciting and attracted people who thought outside the box who created real change. Manhattan seems almost like a serialized hospital room or stuffy museum exhibit the rich can only afford to live in now.