- Jun 21, 2005
- 12,040
- 2,255
- 126
Originally posted by: Elfear
I've benched a X850XT PE and a BFG 7800GTX (460/1300) and they were within a few frames in FarCry @ 1600x1200 4AA/8AF.
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Originally posted by: Elfear
I've benched a X850XT PE and a BFG 7800GTX (460/1300) and they were within a few frames in FarCry @ 1600x1200 4AA/8AF.
Try testing at 2048x1756 4AA/8AF and see what you get . . .![]()
Originally posted by: Sunrise089
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Originally posted by: Elfear
I've benched a X850XT PE and a BFG 7800GTX (460/1300) and they were within a few frames in FarCry @ 1600x1200 4AA/8AF.
Try testing at 2048x1756 4AA/8AF and see what you get . . .![]()
Try seeing what percentage of users have a display that runs 2048x1756 and see what you get....With graphics cards being released so fast, it meens little to nothing to only be faster in useless resolutions for 95% of the market. Yes I know the arguement is that the 7800gt will scale better in next-gen titles, but I also think so will the 8800gt that will be available when said next generation titles really can't be run well of the x850XT PE.
Originally posted by: thilan29
One more thing, can LCDs with a native resolution of 1280x1024 display games at 1600x1200?
Originally posted by: thilan29
thanx for the reply
I did those settings in the HardwareOC benchmark program.
I set it to 4AA/8AF this time and I get like 67fps whereas the 7800GT gets 69.