Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
So I take it you missed:
Because being unable to distinguish between small crimes and large crimes would also seem to be the antithesis of proper morality and values right?
Keep backpedaling.
So I take it you missed:
Because being unable to distinguish between small crimes and large crimes would also seem to be the antithesis of proper morality and values right?
Pulling the pants off of a person without consent, then writing on her body and taking pictures deserves a harsher penalty than 30 days in juvie.
:\two were ordered to serve 30 days - during weekends
Asking a conservative to not take the side of rapists is like asking a conservative to stop being racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and illogical etc. Not going to happen.
Also, i see my nehalem sig is as relevant as ever.
Is there a conservative who ISN'T a repulsive piece of shit?
Embarrass?
You mean rape and humiliate...
Steubenville involved fingering the drunk girl. In this case all we know about is the photo taking.
The two 16-year-old boys admitted in September to two felonies: digitally penetrating Audrie and possessing or controlling photos of her, sources told the newspaper. One of those boys also admitted to a third felony of possessing photos of another girl. The third teen, 17, admitted in December to the same two felonies plus three more, including possessing images of other girls. Counseling and community service were also ordered for all three boys.
And I'm saying that from the girl's perspective you're wrong.
Not only was she sexually assaulted, the evidence was passed around to her classmates.
You do realize the girl killed herself because of this, right?
So according to you if someone takes off your pants while you are passed out and takes pictures of your junk that is no different than raping you in the ass?
That is complete nonsense.
What sexual actions would you be talking about? Is there any evidence of sexual actions other than naked photos?
None. It's reaching a point where you can't slip an underage girl a drug and take her pants off without people getting all uppity about it. :\
When you guys get the straw manning out of your system maybe you can acknowledge the actual arguments nehalem has made?
When you guys get the straw manning out of your system maybe you can acknowledge the actual arguments nehalem has made?
Which is?
That a man should be able to stick his penis in a toaster without any legal consequences.
Like that she had it coming? No woman, especially an underage girl, ever has it coming. Ever. Period.
Or was it his argument that boys will be boys and that's the traditional American way? Well don't forget that the traditional American way also involved those boys sucking off the barrel of a shotgun, and sometimes nobody wanted a new in-law.
Well lets see
(1) If you make bad choices, bad things are more likely to happen to you. Maybe we should teach teenage girls to make good choices.
The question is what is she a victim of?
Could you please just once NOT take the side of rapists on this forum?
Well lets see
(1) If you make bad choices, bad things are more likely to happen to you. Maybe we should teach teenage girls to make good choices. You know like how we teach young children not to get into the van of the creepy guy offering them candy. Or is that supporting pedophile culture now?
(2) Why is there an inability to distinguish between rape and lesser forms of inappropriate sexual behavior?
(3) Why does the media write articles that distort what actually happened. Making what in truth is probably a girl getting so wasted she passes out seem like she had a few sips of beer and then took a nap.
