2nd Stimulus Bipartisan Bill Introduced

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
lol, funny how the GA race is questionable and now the appeal to plebs means something. Months spent telling plebs to GFY, now it's something to take action over. Oh well, guess "better late than never" works here.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
9,383
8,075
136
Fwiw, not everyone even had government (civics) classes. I think it should be part of the core curriculum.

I had one but it was worthless. I remember remarking how stupid the electoral college was and the teacher's answer was well the electoral college and popular vote always agree anyways.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126
for months: "we cannot pass the house approved bill because it is loaded with items unrelated to COVID relief."


today: "we will only consider passing this COVID relief bill if it is loaded with items unrelated to COVID relief."


 
Last edited:

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,588
4,239
136
McConnell blocks Senate Democrats’ initial attempt to approve $2,000 stimulus checks amid growing pressure on GOP leader to act



I still doubt that Mitch allows a floor vote, but we know one thing about the snake. If he thinks this helps the GA Senate contests and thus his chances to cling to power, he'll work behind the scenes on securing the votes. They're up slightly in the GA polls with a lot of early voting already done, so I doubt this ultimately goes anywhere.
 

StinkyPinky

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2002
6,993
1,284
126
McConnell is so heartless you could probably fit two hearts in his chest cavity. Screw that guy.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
these two "senators" from georgia are some of the most corrupt, lyingest sons-a-bitches to ever hold the position:


lol. I've come across my share of people like this during business and it's amazing to watch. I find it hilarious the defense the Reps are playing after Trump sabotaged them with the $2k proposal. He really screwed Perdue and Loeffler with that $2k direct payment talk. If the Dems can't take advantage of this and win, they might as well just give up.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126
lol. I've come across my share of people like this during business and it's amazing to watch. I find it hilarious the defense the Reps are playing after Trump sabotaged them with the $2k proposal. He really screwed Perdue and Loeffler with that $2k direct payment talk. If the Dems can't take advantage of this and win, they might as well just give up.
if there's one thing you can count on in american politics it's the democrats squandering advantage.

dems: it's over republicans, i have the high ground!
reps: you underestimate my power
*reps do a backflip but not really*
*the crowd goes wild*
*russian judge scores it a 10*
dems: fuck!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,850
136
if there's one thing you can count on in american politics it's the democrats squandering advantage.

dems: it's over republicans, i have the high ground!
reps: you underestimate my power
*reps do a backflip but not really*
*the crowd goes wild*
*russian judge scores it a 10*
dems: fuck!
What should democrats be doing right now that they aren’t doing?

I see this criticism of the Democrats a lot but rarely do I see a plan that really sounds preferable. Often people say they should do things they are already doing.

The main issue here is that we are a closely divided country where few people actually make choices based on issues and instead vote tribally. When you combine geographic advantages, gerrymandering, etc. you get a situation where Democrats need to not just win, but win big, over and over. This is really hard!
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,655
2,935
136
I don't recall, is the new proposal $2000/600 for adults/dependents or $2000 straight across?
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,628
12,712
136
Wow, Thune was all worked up on CNN. You know he's soo principled when it comes to the taxpayers money. He can't stand that the money is not directed. There's 2 income federal workers getting $2000 a piece that have never lost income. Yet, who knows how many undeserving PPP recipient companies there were.
Guess, what, I don't get any either (retired). I don't friggin care as I been able to stay home as much as possible and am comfortably paying my bills. Stop with using the perfect to throw out the good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126
What should democrats be doing right now that they aren’t doing?
maybe they haven't squandered the advantage yet. they almost did when chuck was against the $2000 before he was for it. needs to change his prescription.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,850
136
Wow, Thune was all worked up on CNN. You know he's soo principled when it comes to the taxpayers money. He can't stand that the money is not directed. There's 2 income federal workers getting $2000 a piece that have never lost income. Yet, who knows how many undeserving PPP recipient companies there were.
Guess, what, I don't get any either (retired). I don't friggin care as I been able to stay home as much as possible and am comfortably paying my bills. Stop with using the perfect to throw out the good.
‘We might help someone who doesn’t need it, therefore we should help no one’ is...uhmmm, one way to look at it.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126
‘We might help someone who doesn’t need it, therefore we should help no one’ is...uhmmm, one way to look at it.
that's been the republican playbook on any assistance to the poors since the late 70s. since you couldn't just deny black people assistance for dodgy reasons like "there's photos of a man in the house" they had to amplify shit about welfare queens and abusers to justify cutting the system. "we need to privatize medicare because there's abusers that we can't find because we don't fund policing enough and then we vote the biggest abuser ever into the senate!"
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,850
136
maybe they haven't squandered the advantage yet. they almost did when chuck was against the $2000 before he was for it. needs to change his prescription.
I mean who knows, but I personally think the chances of $2,000 checks are very low.

The primary motivating purpose of Republicans in government is to prevent the government from transferring money to poor people. That’s why they come to work every day. The only reason this has even the slightest chance is that Republicans are concerned they might lose the ability to block sending even more money to poor people in the future.

To me the most likely answer is what is already being speculated - McConnell adds on a bunch of extra conditions no one wants and then the bill fails with both sides blaming each other. Then Republicans can get what they really want (no money for poors) while pretending they did. The media is at its most comfortable when it’s able to #bothsides something do they will enthusiastically jump into this.

I’m sure the Democrats are aware of this but I’m not really sure what they can do about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,547
20,262
146
McConnell is going to tie the $2000 check deal with a bill ending the internet liability protections of Section 230.

This will end Democratic support and enable McConnell to spin this as the Democrats killing the bill.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,850
136
McConnell is going to tie the $2000 check deal with a bill ending the internet liability protections of Section 230.

This will end Democratic support and enable McConnell to spin this as the Democrats killing the bill.
Yup, this is the most likely answer. What’s especially nice about this is there’s no way Republicans actually want to end section 230. (No sane person should) They just really, really don’t want poor people to have money and so they are willing to engage in brinksmanship like this.

What would be kind of fun is to call their bluff - get the $2,000 checks and then when conservatives are mass banned, Facebook and Twitter shut down in the US, etc. offer to reinstate it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
McConnell is going to tie the $2000 check deal with a bill ending the internet liability protections of Section 230.

This will end Democratic support and enable McConnell to spin this as the Democrats killing the bill.
Democrats have actually voiced some favorably with revoking 230.

They were the ones complaining that republican misinformation is rampant on the platforms and that they need to be held accountable. How do you think that occurs?



Anyhow, that hasnt yet been confirmed or hinted at.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,850
136
Democrats have actually voiced some favorably with revoking 230.

They were the ones complaining that republican misinformation is rampant on the platforms and that they need to be held accountable. How do you think that occurs?

Anyhow, that hasnt yet been confirmed or hinted at.
That can occur in one of a hundred ways other than tort liability.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,408
8,596
126
Then Republicans can get what they really want (no money for poors) while pretending they did.
which is the failed backflip

The media is at its most comfortable when it’s able to #bothsides something do they will enthusiastically jump into this.
which is the crowd going wild

I’m sure the Democrats are aware of this but I’m not really sure what they can do about it.
need to be hammering loeffler and perdue's bullshit fake claim to be for it while mcconnell gives them cover (which is what they've been doing for ages, mcconnell is safe as can be there in kentucky so is able to give a few republican senators the ability to furrow their brows and pretend to be concerned about something and claim well i would but we didn't have the votes - when this doesn't pass josh hawley is going on his fake hayseed tour in 2022 to iowa talking about how he supported it blah blah)