Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 36,402
- 10,712
- 136
I agree, based on all the name calling and childish behavior displayed on this forum. I was just hoping that they would act better in person.
In person you'd be meeting the Taliban.
I agree, based on all the name calling and childish behavior displayed on this forum. I was just hoping that they would act better in person.
In person you'd be meeting the Taliban.
I agree, based on all the name calling and childish behavior displayed on this forum. I was just hoping that they would act better in person.
By taking an L on NOLA, you have to accept that the same thing is going to happen to a whole bunch of coast communities eventually. Nobody wants to be holding that football when the time comes, so they keep kicking it down the road to be someone else's problem.So Katrina cost taxpayers $125 billion, Ida will no doubt be in the upward range toward $100 billion. So as storms increase in intensity the damages will only get worse. So is New Orleans worth spending a trillion dollars to keep above water? I don't think so. In the long run it would be cheaper to move the population elsewhere. New Orleans is similar to Afghanistan. We're just throwing money away and there is no way to win, especially against mother nature.
Serious question:So Katrina cost taxpayers $125 billion, Ida will no doubt be in the upward range toward $100 billion. So as storms increase in intensity the damages will only get worse. So is New Orleans worth spending a trillion dollars to keep above water? I don't think so. In the long run it would be cheaper to move the population elsewhere. New Orleans is similar to Afghanistan. We're just throwing money away and there is no way to win, especially against mother nature.
No one who lives along the coast wants to abandon their homes. But mother nature is going to take them away and federal flood insurance is not going to keep paying people to rebuild in these high risk areas. New Orleans was built (stupidly) below sea level. There is little hope of saving it in the long run. We've all seen footage of surf wiping out homes in the Northeast and it will continue to happen where people have built right on the water. Had hurricane Michael been a little further east my home in South Georgia probably would have been demolished. I think at some point I may have to abandon South Georgia because of the increasing intensity of the hurricanes.Serious question:
Are you prepared to abandon the coasts?
None of us are 'prepared' for that, I think that's the point. We're not taking the steps necessary to abandon it, and mother nature doesn't much give a damn.Serious question:
Are you prepared to abandon the coasts?
Shhhhh!!!!...now repubs will have more ammo for "natural" climate change like those snowballs in winter.None of us are 'prepared' for that, I think that's the point. We're not taking the steps necessary to abandon it, and mother nature doesn't much give a damn.
Friendly reminder, due to lunar nodal cycle, in 2035, the global sea level will be 14" higher, only due to the moon's influence on ocean level. It'll likely be higher than that due to ongoing ice melt as well.
![]()
Yeah except the fact they can't explain why ocean levels didn't drop over the last 14 years. Not that it matters to those brain-dead idiots.Shhhhh!!!!...now repubs will have more ammo for "natural" climate change like those snowballs in winter.![]()
It’s more fun though to declare everything hopeless and impossible. Not directed at you but some earlier posters in this thread who didn’t wait for any facts before writing off NOLA.Looks like the levees in NO held up well.
![]()
Hurricane Ida updates: In Ida’s Grip, Louisiana Struggles to Assess the Damage (Published 2021)
About a million customers were left without power as a slow-moving storm pummeled the region, causing at least three deaths.www.nytimes.com
It’s more fun though to declare everything hopeless and impossible. Not directed at you but some earlier posters in this thread who didn’t wait for any facts before writing off NOLA.
I just assumed that they improved the levee structure after Katrina. In fact, I recall reading years back that they had done so.
It’s more fun though to declare everything hopeless and impossible. Not directed at you but some earlier posters in this thread who didn’t wait for any facts before writing off NOLA.
I don't think I ever declared things as hopeless and impossible, but while the levees held, the entire city is out of power for 3 weeks, and the hospitals are still filled with covid patients. It seems like it will be awhile before damage can actually be assessed.
Paywall.Looks like the levees in NO held up well.
![]()
Hurricane Ida updates: In Ida’s Grip, Louisiana Struggles to Assess the Damage (Published 2021)
About a million customers were left without power as a slow-moving storm pummeled the region, causing at least three deaths.www.nytimes.com
So Katrina cost taxpayers $125 billion, Ida will no doubt be in the upward range toward $100 billion. So as storms increase in intensity the damages will only get worse. So is New Orleans worth spending a trillion dollars to keep above water? I don't think so. In the long run it would be cheaper to move the population elsewhere. New Orleans is similar to Afghanistan. We're just throwing money away and there is no way to win, especially against mother nature.
Herd immunity will save them from having to do anything. See how well that works. Yes, I'm in the right post.Shhhhh!!!!...now repubs will have more ammo for "natural" climate change like those snowballs in winter.![]()
