UglyCasanova
Lifer
- Mar 25, 2001
- 19,275
- 1,361
- 126
It’s a reasonable question for the census, I’m not sure why the outrage.
Maybe we should just provide blanket amnesty.
It’s a reasonable question for the census, I’m not sure why the outrage.
I bet you do, it's just depressing.I genuinely don’t get why so many people are playing dumb about this.
Canada doesn't have anywhere near the Illegal Immigrant issue that the US does. Nor does it have a government that currently is constantly vilifying Immigrants.
You aren’t even making logical sense anymore. Counting all the people we can is the POINT OF THE CENSUS
In addition to collecting population data for the purposes of accurately apportioning congressional districts, the federal government uses census data, among other reasons, to determine:
- The allocation of federal funding for education programs in states and communities.
- National social and health statistics used by a variety of agencies for policy purposes.
- The allocation of federal dollars for law enforcement, federal highway projects, aid to farmers and many other federally financed activities and programs.
- A wide variety of economic statistics that become the basis of the nation's economic policies.
so back to the question. Why does Canada ask the citizenship question on its census?
and why is it done? thats the part you keep skipping over
so back to the question. Why does Canada ask the citizenship question on its census?
Moot. Again.
I feel like between the two sides, yours is much more fearful.fail. is the answer that scary to you to not answer?
fail. is the answer that scary to you to not answer?
Not scary at all, there's just a real good reason that asking it in the US at this time risks making it a waste of Time and Money.
is this a punt or fumble i cant decide.
Deportations in Canada are on the rise and they have strict criteria for what constitutes a refugee. They are currently struggling to process a huge wave of Haitians.Does Canada currently have their immigration police randomly rounding up people and deporting them?
Enforcement of federal law is now hostility?Do they have a president who has shown hostility to immigrants?
They have one now and its causing the same tensions we’ve beed dealing with in AmericaHas Canada had immigration issues in the past?
It is the product of white European colonization and manifest destiny, same as AmericaDoes Canada have a racist history?
The French populations of Canada are very tribal, and the rural areas are not unlike the tribal libertarians of New England and the state of Jefferson.Does Canada have a large population of racist citizens?
We have two, so we’re ahead on that count.Does Canada have a political party that uses racial animosity for political gain?
Deportations in Canada are on the rise and they have strict criteria for what constitutes a refugee. They are currently struggling to process a huge wave of Haitians.
So it's not an on going issue that Canadians have had to deal with consistently throughout its history. Got it.
Enforcement of federal law is now hostility?
bubble boy, I was talking about the president and the Republican party who ran on building a wall and deportation. To answer your question though, yes, in the eyes of an illegal immigrant the enforcement of immigration law is indeed hostile, duh.
They have one now and its causing the same tensions we’ve beed dealing with in America
So again, its not something they've had a long history of.
It is the product of white European colonization and manifest destiny, same as America
lol no, manifest destiny is not the same as a slave economy, a civil war to keep said slave economy, and later laws to discriminate and suppress people based on their racial make up.
The French populations of Canada are very tribal, and the rural areas are not unlike the tribal libertarians of New England and the state of Jefferson.
Is that the same as racism?
We have two, so we’re ahead on that count.
and why is it done? thats the part you keep skipping over
What is this idea based on? Empirical research strongly indicates the opposite. Is this just your feelings?
Irrelevant to the census.
The shrug emoji would have worked just as well, since you have nothing.
That's truthiness, right? You believe what you believe because you want to believe it despite having no evidence at all.
The part you & the Admin have yet to explain is why that question is necessary & why normal protocols were bypassed to introduce it at the last moment. What will you do with the information?
Having the most accurate census possible shouldn't be a partisan issue. Including that question certainly won't make it more accurate.
Your "shouldn't be here in the first place" remark is telling, an attempt to deny reality. They *are* here. That's the truth, and the census should tell us the truth, shouldn't it?
As I said I think ...
Link where Empirical research strongly indicates that illegals participate in the census.
All true. Now explain how citizenship has anything to do with that.
Wait, you’re arguing no respond? Wut? You can’t seriously be arguing this.
I'm not arguing at all. I am expressing my thoughts on the matter and you disagree.
I am saying what I have said all along. Read my post.
I did. If you aren’t arguing that none respond then your other post is irrelevant as then the question is simply what proportion do and then we are back to my point. Will including this increase or decrease participation?