• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2007 Academy Awards

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Ok, who is this old guy talking next to Clint? He's going on way too long. 🙁


Ennio Morricone. Some of use like to hear what the winners have to say and have an attention span beyond 45 seconds.
 
Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: daveymark
Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: daveymark
lol, seinfeld delivers. this is what we should be seeing, not smarmy vice presidents babbling on about their cause

Most winners of the documentary category like to babble about their cause.

I was talking about presentations, not acceptance speeches. algore presented earlier

DiCaprio pushed that more than Al Gore, didn't he? I would agree with you on that point, but either way I don't see how one or two moments in a 4 hour show would bother someone so much. The rest of the show is very amusing, IMO.

not sure how it bothers anyone beyond a point of simple observation. especially you, since you agree with me. if anything, seinfeld overshadowed any point algore hoped to make. let's move on to some of the other more entertaining points of the show, no need to dwell on this.

 
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
lol, apparently 3 out of 5 weren't good enough odds for Dreamgirls. ouch.

Every single one of those dreamgirls songs blew etheridge's song out of the water. Oh well.
 
Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
lol, apparently 3 out of 5 weren't good enough odds for Dreamgirls. ouch.

That's exactly why they didn't win. They fought each other for votes.

You're just justifying things because I'm sure you guessed Etheridge's song would win 😉 I understand what you're saying, but I don't believe it. Either way, I was just making a joke...if the songs didn't deserve to win, they didn't deserve to win.

And this is a very varied montage.
 
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Am I the only one who likes An Inconvenient Truth?

Oh well. You other guys can just eat your sour grapes.

I enjoyed it as well. I think there is merit to the best song thing, because that particular song wasn't as good as the dreamgirls ones. It didn't win because of some agenda though, just because the dreamgirls songs stole votes from each other.
 
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
lol, apparently 3 out of 5 weren't good enough odds for Dreamgirls. ouch.

That's exactly why they didn't win. They fought each other for votes.

You're just justifying things because I'm sure you guessed Etheridge's song would win 😉 I understand what you're saying, but I don't believe it. Either way, I was just making a joke...if the songs didn't deserve to win, they didn't deserve to win.

And this is a very varied montage.

A lot of people have been saying this for a while. A couple of the Dreamgirls songs were clearly better songs than the Inconvenient truth song, and they likely stole votes from each other. I don't think that's a poor assumption at all.
 
Originally posted by: CellarDoor
Originally posted by: chuckywang
Am I the only one who likes An Inconvenient Truth?

Oh well. You other guys can just eat your sour grapes.

I enjoyed it as well. I think there is merit to the best song thing, because that particular song wasn't as good as the dreamgirls ones. It didn't win because of some agenda though, just because the dreamgirls songs stole votes from each other.

Yeah, that is true.
 
Back
Top