If by "fix" you mean acting accordingly under conditioning.
Should we install 24 hour surveillance camera's in kitchens of the Obese? They be less likely to indulge themselves, so it's ok by your logic.
If by "fix" you mean acting accordingly under conditioning.
Should we install 24 hour surveillance camera's in kitchens of the Obese? They be less likely to indulge themselves, so it's ok by your logic.
You boys need to put away your 1955 encyclopedias. Socialism has redefined itself to go far beyond "industry ownership". It's like the right and left have taken all the crappy ideas from each side and decided to use them...
The UK have lost their collective mind long time ago. Mind you, they voted for Blair twice, much as we voted for Bush twice - a fine pair of likely-minded criminals. The Labour party in the UK designed and has overseen the greatest erosion of personal and civil liberties in any developed country in the past two decades. Stalin and Ceausescu must be green with envy in their graves. Having relatives who live there, I feel very disturbed. The saddest thing is that the most likely next ruler's mindset (the Conservative party) is not very different from Labour's mindset, just a few more tax breaks for the rich.
Wow.....I'm stunned by such a thing. If the parents are that abusive, then take the kids away from them. Geez, is that harder to do? Having cameras just creates that hostile "I'm going to fuck you up if those cameras were not there" environment and can't be seen as really improving anything. Of course I see the logic is that "But those who will abuse will do it anyways; once they get mad enough, lose their control, and beat their child then we will have video evidence", but I don't like it at all. I'd honestly rather have a kid take a few hits and then take him away from the parent once you establish those bruises are from a beating than to say "Lets put cams and watch you guys constantly". We can't allow ourselves to go down such a path.
I do'nt like it one bit and have the same feelings as a lot of the guys here, but without the "socialism" nonsense. It is simply authoritarian. I'm glad however that many of us share the same feelings because if/when this idea creeps up in our country, we need to be ready to stand up and strike it down regardless if we are D, R, I or something else.
I do'nt like it one bit and have the same feelings as a lot of the guys here, but without the "socialism" nonsense. It is simply authoritarian. I'm glad however that many of us share the same feelings because if/when this idea creeps up in our country, we need to be ready to stand up and strike it down regardless if we are D, R, I or something else.
Huh? This is one weird way to look at this logically. If these parents are so bad they require something like this the kids shouldnt be living with them. All a camera will do is capture the abuse when it shouldnt be allowed in the first place once the authorities know it is going on.
This is just an end around to place camera's in everybody's home in England. Once they establish it is for the kids they will move to every home with a child. Forget the due process, we are all criminals and need monitoring.
StageLeft
No Lifer
- Sep 29, 2000
- 70,150
- 5
- 0
There are two issues here.
All criminal activity requires anonymity.
The capacity to overthrow a dictatorship requires anonymity.
Freedom from false charges by a dictatorship or otherwise requite full public access to the real facts.
The only solution is total information recording that is totally confidential and cannot be accessed except for defense.
We will have AI likely by 2029 if Moore's Law holds up and the flops estimated to be required are correct.
Perhaps we can ask the machines how they can insure this then.
All criminal activity requires anonymity.
The capacity to overthrow a dictatorship requires anonymity.
Freedom from false charges by a dictatorship or otherwise requite full public access to the real facts.
The only solution is total information recording that is totally confidential and cannot be accessed except for defense.
We will have AI likely by 2029 if Moore's Law holds up and the flops estimated to be required are correct.
Perhaps we can ask the machines how they can insure this then.
Accountability. If the parents aren't living up to their most basic of duties, their kids will be taken away. This isn't for good parents or even mediocre parents. Its for the most neglectful.
Comparing known bad parents to suspected terrorists is hardly a fair comparison. The former are guilty, the latter are not.
Er, I think general parenting practices - you know bathing, clothing, and feeding the kids are generally accepted practices and not the result of some authority.
Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,268
- 126
So is smoking pot.
Therefore, anyone whom has been convicted of possession of marijuana ought to be monitored.
Think of the children.
Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,268
- 126
The answer lies with the makers of the machines, but we have Constitutional protections. You would never see wiretaps without warrants for example. The system is foolproof. You can trust Big Brother.
BoberFett
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 37,562
- 9
- 81
http://www.tressugar.com/3555563
Fat people have fat kids. We do need to install cameras in the houses of fatties to make sure they don't make their kids fat.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter