Of course you forgot to point that it s 143W measured at the 12V ATX rail, before VRMs and routing losses, even at 88% efficency this wouldnt be more than 125W while the 165-185W consumed by the 9900K are measured in the CPU package sensors, if measured at the 12V rail they would amount to 185-210W, roughly...
Anyway quite a methodology of yours here, out of curiosity i checked the power for Cinebench at Computerbase for the 2700X, they measured 147W delta at the main, so how could GN measure as much at the 12V rail with the same software....?
https://www.computerbase.de/2018-06...ition-cpu-test/2/#abschnitt_leistungsaufnahme
I once asked you to point other reviews that would confirm GN numbers, of course no answer, instead yo keep using this case wich is apparently flawed and not even reproducible, if it is could you point another review that say so..?..
https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8602/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-5-2600x-review/index10.html
www.techspot.com/amp/review/1613-amd-ryzen-2700x-2600x/page4.html
https://techreport.com/review/33531/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-and-ryzen-5-2600x-cpus-reviewed/8
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,7.html
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Proce...ew-Zen-Matures/Power-Consumption-Overclocki-0
As I said, at the very least this demands some scrutiny like the 9900K numbers did. Consistently 40 - 50W higher power draw than the 8700K systems, and 190W - 200W system power draw in CB / Blender when idle is approx 50W for most reviewers.
Edit - of course, I see you questioning Stilts 140W findings as well here: https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/ryzen-strictly-technical.2500572/page-75
Last edited: