I use the "idiot" label to refer to those who fail to understand, or fail to adequately respond to, my very straightforward argument regarding complexity as a function of number of different devices and interfaces.
I said, there's no difference in complexity, nor convenience, between driving a car slowly, or quickly. Because, I said, in both cases, you're using the same interface to access the same device. In contrast to this, I said, one method of accessing the Me.Net service requires multiple devices (computer and phone) and multiple interfaces (GUI/browser interface and phone keypad) as well as more steps. The second method requires one device, one interface, and fewer steps.
It appears this argument went right over dabuddha's head, who only managed to say "some people like to do things one way, others like things other ways". He completely ignored the points I made regarding devices, interfaces, and speed, and how differences in the former lead to increased complexity, while differences in the latter do not. "different ways" is not an expression of sufficient granularity. Are you referring to different devices, different interfaces, different speeds, or something else entirely?
Honestly, when my opponent fails to even adequately address my rebuttals, let alone try and counter them, I consider him an idiot. If you want to get more respect from me, try and argue in a less idiotlike manner.