1.35ghz ready to join team Anandtech...Seti or RC5?

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Like the topic says...

Also, where to get clients and how to join....

Thanks in advance... :)
 

Michael

Elite member
Nov 19, 1999
5,435
234
106
Either project would be fine. It depends on what you're interested in. Both help the team.

Michael

ps - click the link in my sig to get the SETI client
 

Fardringle

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2000
9,200
765
126
That system would kick butt at both SETI and RC5. The project for you to join depends on what interests you most: cracking encryption codes or looking for ET...

You can get the DNET (RC5 client) from here, and the SETI client for Windows (GUI) here and the command line client (a little faster than the GUI client) here.


Edit: Michael's link will also give you all of the information you need to join the SETI team...
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Ok..I think I will give Seti a try..is there more than one team or just one for each program?
 

DanC

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2000
5,553
0
0
With that kind of power, you might consider both... we're kinda trying that around here. :)
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
TA has one team (by name) that runs many different projects. If you want to run seti, you can sign up and join TA that way.
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
I just got Seti up and running...it is flying. I really like the GUI...:)

It seems to be taking about 2 minutes to get 1% of a WU done...is this good?
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Believe it or not, it may go a lot faster yet if you disable the GUI! :) There is also a CLI version of the SETI client that runs even faster than the GUI with the graphics off.
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
If you want the big numbers, you can just run the one instance of the text client (the &quot;CLI&quot;)...

But... there's lots of add-on programs you could try if you want to see what you're processing (without taking up extra CPU cycles)! :)

[EDIT: Had to look up a link for one. Check out SetiSpy, which will show you your progress and lots of other goodies!]
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
&quot;But... there's lots of add-on programs you could try if you want to see what you're processing (without taking up extra CPU cycles)!&quot;

Ok..sounds good. Where to get these &quot;add-ons&quot;? Also, does the GUI client go faster when it is minimized? I am keeping it minimized..
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
Check out the link in my message above you that I added after you posted!

:)
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Ok..that looks cool. Can I just switch the client I am running now for the command line one? How hard is the CL one to use?
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
You might want to unistall the other one (I think that option is in the Start menu under programs). When the screensaver one is installed, it's automatically set to always start at boot, so it always gets in the way.

With the text one, just as a quicky way, you could start it by bringing up Windows Explorer, finding where you unizpped it, and double click. It'll open a DOS box and will go through the log in process. Then it'll get to a point where it downloads the new work and sits there. Just minimize and let it run...

As you become more proficient, you can hide the box and run it different ways with different programs (Setispy will let you start it up).
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Ok..I am using the command line version and that SetiSpy program. It seems much faster with the command line version...these are the readings SetiSpy is giving me..any good?

Processing rate: 3.08 hour/ work unit (32.43% / hour)
Processing speed: 368.79 MegaFLOPs / second
Processing efficiency: 3.76 CPU cycles / FLOP
Floating point operations to process: 4.09 TeraFLOPs

 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Looks good! :) You will find that for the first half of the WU at least, the estimated completion times are a bit optomistic. They settle down towards the end. And I forgot to say... Welcome to the Team! :)
 

Poof

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2000
4,305
0
0
Usually with those monitoring programs, you want to give it some time to process and then you'll actually get more accurate results.

Setispy does have an estimated total time for the WU to complete and with that, we can determine how you're doing!

[EDIT: Wow mech... we posted at almost the same time! ;)]
 

Sukhoi

Elite Member
Dec 5, 1999
15,350
106
106
Welcome to the team! :D

Those number seem great with the 3.03 CLI! I can't imagine 3 hours/WU with the new client. ;)
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
Yeah, those readings are slowly going down...I will post the final reading when it's done...I've done about 17% in 46 minutes..
 

Wiz

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2000
6,459
16
81
Hi Insane3D, welcome to the team.
I have 3 machines running seti for a total of avout 2.5Ghz and with the new version of seti it starts out saying it will do the WU in about 3 hours, it gradually recalculates until the end when it says it will finish in about 6 hours 50 minutes. That's on a 1Ghz P3 running Win2K with the Mosel cas2 ram.
Just so you have something to compare to after your work unit is finished:)