adroc_thurston
Diamond Member
- Jul 2, 2023
- 7,702
- 10,428
- 106
A14 itself is 25-30% less power iso perf so yeahZen 7 uses 40% less power than zen 6 for the same performance
A14 itself is 25-30% less power iso perf so yeahZen 7 uses 40% less power than zen 6 for the same performance
Super Power Rail is their brand of backside power delivery?
Yeah.Super Power Rail is their brand of backside power delivery?
Valve is waiting for something like Zen 7? Call me skeptical, but Valve has made it quite clear by now, both in action and interviews, that they're not interested in adopting the current gen architectures for their hardware because they want to pursue volume at low cost. If Valve is waiting for Zen 7, then that means we shouldn't expect a Steam Deck 2 until after the launch of Zen 8. Maybe they are, but does that mean we're potentially 5+ years away from a SteamDeck 2?Zen 7 uses 40% less power than zen 6 for the same performance
Zen 7 uses 40% less power than zen 6 for the same performance
There are no monolithic low power rdna 5 apus with zen 6 medusaThe CPU probably isn't what would be keeping Valve from launching steam deck 2. If anything, they would be waiting for AMD to move past RDNA 3.5.
It's amazing how is sounds but Intel said the same with Panther Lake vs Lunar Lake node shrink gives 25-30% Power reduction ezy plus some architectural improvement and 40% is not a tall order.Zen 7 uses 40% less power than zen 6 for the same performance
Zen 7 would be too new for a 2028 launch from valve. a 4.0 ghz zen6c is already way ahead of 3.5 ghz zen2 that's in the steam deck, and probably uses the same amount of power. And now that Ryzen Z series is an actual line of products, amd can justify making a refresh of MDS1 with RDNA 5 instead of 3.5; there's no need for amd to wait until Zen7 to put a decent GPU architecture into their mainstream APUsValve is waiting for something like Zen 7? Call me skeptical, but Valve has made it quite clear by now, both in action and interviews, that they're not interested in adopting the current gen architectures for their hardware because they want to pursue volume at low cost. If Valve is waiting for Zen 7, then that means we shouldn't expect a Steam Deck 2 until after the launch of Zen 8. Maybe they are, but does that mean we're potentially 5+ years away from a SteamDeck 2?
What is the need other way round? For a zen 6 refresh?there's no need for amd to wait until Zen7 to put a decent GPU architecture into their mainstream APUs
They can just throttle Medusa Halo. That won't necessarily meet their cost metrics though.There are no monolithic low power rdna 5 apus with zen 6 medusa
Wasn't there a rumored custom RDNA5 SoC for the portable playstation?There are no monolithic low power rdna 5 apus with zen 6 medusa
Zen 7 grimlock point 4 should come in at 15 watts or less
No because Deck 2 is Qualcomm.but does that mean we're potentially 5+ years away from a SteamDeck 2
Writing was on the wall with Qualcomm doing the VR headset. Gives Qualcomm a shot now at other similar projects elsewhere and puts in incentive for others to work out better x86 to arm translation. Strategic mistake imoNo because Deck 2 is Qualcomm.
as long as playstation is on x86 its fine. If sony ever moves to any other ISA its over for x86 then its time to worry but sony won't thanks to amd gpu ipWriting was on the wall with Qualcomm doing the VR headset. Gives Qualcomm a shot now at other similar projects elsewhere and puts in incentive for others to work out better x86 to arm translation. Strategic mistake imo
No?Writing was on the wall with Qualcomm doing the VR headset
QC PC biz is staffed with inept cretins.Gives Qualcomm a shot now at other similar projects elsewhere and puts in incentive for others to work out better x86 to arm translation.
It would be a pain and why would you migrate though when your current stuff works fine and in migration you will only suffer pain.as long as playstation is on x86 its fine. If sony ever moves to any other ISA its over for x86 then its time to worry but sony won't thanks to amd gpu ip
Headsets work on the same power envelopes as handhelds. So it's an avenue in. I'm not disputing that without something custom/semi custom that x86 (well AMD) can't provide that now, but allowing Qualcomm into the headset gives them an opening for the steam deck 2 and that gives them better tools to break into other markets.No?
Headsets just have very strict power ranges and no one ships a 5W SoC in x86 land.
QC PC biz is staffed with inept cretins.
Delulu.Headsets work on the same power envelopes as handhelds.
They can. Just don't want to.I'm not disputing that without something custom/semi custom that x86 (well AMD) can't provide that now
What other markets.but allowing Qualcomm into the headset gives them an opening for the steam deck 2 and that gives them better tools to break into other markets.
Oh no my child s/w is the least of QC's problem in the PC space.Luckily for Qualcomm valve are not inept software wise, and it's their expertise backing Qualcomm that's should be AMDs concern.
Do they have a roadmap past X2 Elite?Oh no my child s/w is the least of QC's problem in the PC space.
