poke01
Diamond Member
- Mar 8, 2022
- 4,231
- 5,566
- 106
Wait even with NanoFlex, NVL A0 is stuck at 5.7GHz?A0 is very much out lol, it's not looking good.
Wait even with NanoFlex, NVL A0 is stuck at 5.7GHz?A0 is very much out lol, it's not looking good.
B2 is very much out as well lol. It looks sooooo incredible.A0 is very much out lol, it's not looking good.
yeah.Wait even with NanoFlex, NVL A0 is stuck at 5.7GHz?
I mean they've sacked IDC basically.cause if that is true, Intel should held their heads in shame
They must be working on something. To justify their wages.I mean they've sacked IDC basically.
Even with deuce nanoo?A0 is very much out lol, it's not looking good.
Well, the low clocks might be indicative of ultra high IPC ala Apple Fire cores, and not a design flop. With only 8 or 16 P cores and the rest being shat cores, Im would think Intel pulled out all the stops to make them as wide and all consuming as possible. Could they pull another Alder Lake P core miracle that will leapfrog AMD again like they did with Zen 3 (P cores)?It's a good node, not a magic stick.
A 11-12 wide core at 5.7GHz would be cool to seeWell, the low clocks might be indicative of ultra high IPC ala Apple Fire cores, and not a design flop. With only 8 or 16 P cores and the rest being shat cores, Im would think Intel pulled out all the stops to make them as wide and all consuming as possible. Could they pull another Alder Lake P core miracle that will leapfrog AMD again like they did with Zen 3 (P cores)?
Low teens IPC over LNC.Well, the low clocks might be indicative of ultra high IPC ala Apple Fire cores,
Their cores have been that since SNC.With only 8 or 16 P cores and the rest being shat cores, Im would think Intel pulled out all the stops to make them as wide and all consuming as possible
Honestly this is just cute.Could they pull another Alder Lake P core miracle that will leapfrog AMD again like they did with Zen 3 (P cores)?
I guess Zen6 is the same but with higher clocks and better cache system.Low teens IPC over LNC
Yeah that's kinda the point.I guess Zen6 is the same but with higher clocks and better cache system.
and we know all that 1 year before release
How sure are you? Next year is supposed to be Zen 5 Refresh with official CUDIMM support, no?Less than a year*
How sure are you? Next year is supposed to be Zen 5 Refresh with official CUDIMM support, no?
The whatNext year is supposed to be Zen 5 Refresh with official CUDIMM support, no?
Intel 7 is way overtuned it gets 6 Ghz while AMD does 5.7 on N5/N4PIt's kinda hard to get only 5% fmax outta two shrinks.
Then again, Intel gets 0%.
Intel A0 are a messA0 is very much out lol, it's not looking good.
Is CUDIMM support coming to Ryzens, Yes or No? Because if it's supported by Zen 6 then why Zen 5 on the same mobo won't be able to take advantage of it?The what
While I am ignorant, I would expect that CUDIMM due to clock buffering has to be supported by memory controller. Memory controller is in iOD. Zen6 will get new iOD. There is no reason for Zen5 to get new IOD, is there? Keep in mind that people buy mostly single CCD SKUs, these are almost BW bottlenecked by iOD link at 6000 MT/s. Why would you want more? The dual CCD SKUs still require care to use more BW so the benefit is situational anyway.Is CUDIMM support coming to Ryzens, Yes or No? Because if it's supported by Zen 6 then why Zen 5 on the same mobo won't be able to take advantage of it?
point is Intel's getting the same babby fmax on N3b and N2p both.Intel 7 is way overtuned it gets 6 Ghz while AMD does 5.7 on N5/N4P
well yeah, but they've charted the v/f and its uh oh stinky.Intel A0 are a mess
who cares, you're not getting anything out of higher membw on Granite Ridge.Is CUDIMM support coming to Ryzens, Yes or No? Because if it's supported by Zen 6 then why Zen 5 on the same mobo won't be able to take advantage of it?
That's what happens when your entire team is scooped by Huwaei and Nvidia but this is ridiculouspoint is Intel's getting the same babby fmax on N3b and N2p both.