• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 945 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
darkswordsman17 said:
Press X to pay respect!
Click to expand...

Can't I press F instead?

darkswordsman17 said:
Or better yet, they'll let you change your voice, so all the pedophiles and white supremacists can groom kids on Xbox Live!
Click to expand...

They're all on Discord. Or Roblox.

At this point it seems that you're not all that impressed with NPUs, and to be honest, I still don't see a purpose for them either. Maybe someone will make good use of them eventually. For now, iGPUs and dGPUs have so much more inference power that NPUs seem like a waste of silicon.
 
Thunder 57 said:
True, but in that case they want you to buy an Epyc, not a "cheap" desktop part.
Click to expand...
Strix Halo is now a mini desktop part and NOT cheap 🙂

I think dual CCD V-cache will come true someday. Someone at AMD is plotting as we speak on how to make it happen, just like someone did for the ultimate APU aka Strix Halo.
 
igor_kavinski said:
Strix Halo is now a mini desktop part and NOT cheap 🙂

I think dual CCD V-cache will come true someday. Someone at AMD is plotting as we speak on how to make it happen, just like someone did for the ultimate APU aka Strix Halo.
Click to expand...

I think so too. But right now they have trouble enough producing 9800X3D's. Maybe once production isn't an issue they will.
 
Thunder 57 said:
True, but in that case they want you to buy an Epyc, not a "cheap" desktop part.
Click to expand...
The cheapest X series Epyc Zen4 is listed at about $5000, and that's before a single cent of platform costs, for a 16 core processor. A 9950X3d2 would be profitable at $1000 and have nearly the same performance in many loads (but certainly not all and much more in others with higher clocks). Sell it under the Epyc 4xxx line as the 4685PX if you have to.
 
Thunder 57 said:
I think so too. But right now they have trouble enough producing 9800X3D's. Maybe once production isn't an issue they will.
Click to expand...
Exactly this. Stacking is the limiting factor for production. Though I expect it to remain that way for a long time. HBM would be useful for graphics, but it's going to be capacity limited for forever. Same for stacking. A dual CCD stacked client part isn't anywhere near the top of the tree for importance, I expect it to similarly be unavailable for a long time
 
there's bound to be some slowdown in fab demand as LLMs become less resource-intensive and shops already have billions of GPUs in stock

also computing is already at a point where upgrades from now on will become more and more meaningless

there's bound to be increasing tons of unsold stock

also on mobile phones it's now already at least 4-5 years where upgrades have become meaningless, for example Galaxy S26 offers very little over Galaxy S21 or whatever

https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=13610&idPhone2=10626#diff- literally the only main diff is 3nm vs 5nm chip over 4 years and it's a completely meaningless upgrade
 
Any confirmation that Zen5 cores in StrixHalo has full AVX512 width FPU or not? I can only remember Zen5 in StrixHalo looks similar to GraniteRidge.
 
igor_kavinski said:
Strix Halo is now a mini desktop part and NOT cheap 🙂

I think dual CCD V-cache will come true someday. Someone at AMD is plotting as we speak on how to make it happen, just like someone did for the ultimate APU aka Strix Halo.
Click to expand...

I feel like stacking it on the memory controller means they'd only need one still, and could benefit multiple dies (be they CPU or GPU).

I wondered if that wasn't even the idea behind the c cores to begin with, they go with limited L3 because they'd be stacking it. Beef up L1 and L2 instead.

LightningZ71 said:
The cheapest X series Epyc Zen4 is listed at about $5000, and that's before a single cent of platform costs, for a 16 core processor. A 9950X3d2 would be profitable at $1000 and have nearly the same performance in many loads (but certainly not all and much more in others with higher clocks). Sell it under the Epyc 4xxx line as the 4685PX if you have to.
Click to expand...

I'm still surprised that AMD didn't just push the multi dice chips to Threadripper. Especially this year with how the 370 chip could cover most consumer wants. I'm also surprised they haven't done something like make the Zen 5c dice be the X3D chip (sacrifice some of the density towards the TSV to enable the stacked cache), which would make them more appealing as you'd gain the cache for games but gain cores as well. It'd let them simplify the stack, or maybe even add a 3rd dice, so they do single dice at $599 where it'd offer what the 9900X3D does, a dual dice at $799 which would offer more than the 9950X3D, and then a third top of the line one at $999.

I really feel like AMD should have gone APU with embedded memory for consumer (the 370 AI chip really would've been good enough, especially with fast RAM), merge AM5 and Threadripper as a single platform go quad channel. They'd be able to offer the core counts of Threadripper outside the highest (which is what EPYC is for), plus it could've offered the ability to do Strix Halo like chips with even more RAM.

fastandfurious6 said:
there's bound to be some slowdown in fab demand as LLMs become less resource-intensive and shops already have billions of GPUs in stock

also computing is already at a point where upgrades from now on will become more and more meaningless

there's bound to be increasing tons of unsold stock

also on mobile phones it's now already at least 4-5 years where upgrades have become meaningless, for example Galaxy S26 offers very little over Galaxy S21 or whatever

https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=13610&idPhone2=10626#diff- literally the only main diff is 3nm vs 5nm chip over 4 years and it's a completely meaningless upgrade
Click to expand...

Until they push larger AI chips in every internet of things devices and other claiming they need it to run all those "less resource intensive LLMs" on device, and suddenly every single thing (including toasters and probably the kitchen sink) need to have SoCs in them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top