Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 720 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
788
2,855
106
So basically it looks ok compared to previous gen X-SKUs, because ist more efficient. But if you compare it to real predecessors, it's complete garbage. Like 10% more efficient, 15% faster in Applications and barely faster in Gaming.
Oh, it gets so much worse than that when you take the increase in core area into account.
 
Feb 17, 2020
108
289
136
Turns out it really is a "bulldozer moment" somewhat.
Years of expectation, huge changes to the architecture, negative IPC slower than previous gen, only performs well under specific right circumstances (at least power is good), gives time to the competition to breath and strike back with call.

Make me fear that Zen 6 and Zen 7 will be Piledrivers and Steamrollers.
"Leapfrogging design teams" - AMD should check their payrolls to see if some of them haven't leapfrogged out of the company.
These are linked
 

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
788
2,855
106
Turns out it really is a "bulldozer moment" somewhat.
Years of expectation, huge changes to the architecture, negative IPC slower than previous gen, only performs well under specific right circumstances (at least power is good), gives time to the competition to breath and strike back with calm.

Make me fear that Zen 6 and Zen 7 will be Piledrivers and Steamrollers.

Zen 6 likely will, Zen 7 is a bit of an unknown given that it's developed by a different team.
 

yuri69

Senior member
Jul 16, 2013
699
1,252
136
Turns out it really is a "bulldozer moment" somewhat.
Years of expectation, huge changes to the architecture, negative IPC slower than previous gen, only performs well under specific right circumstances (at least power is good), gives time to the competition to breath and strike back with calm.

Make me fear that Zen 6 and Zen 7 will be Piledrivers and Steamrollers.

Zen 5% is real.

Btw on Linux it is a different story (just like with Bulldozer): https://www.phoronix.com/review/ryzen-9600x-9700x
 

gaav87

Senior member
Apr 27, 2024
659
1,279
96
@Josh128 Well just get 5800x3d and oc it to 2000IF to replace your 5950x and be done with it :) No need to spend extra on ram and mobo and you will be faster then zen5 :)
 

MarkPost

Senior member
Mar 1, 2017
378
794
136
TDP (PPT) was reduced. So you're getting the same performance at a lower power level. If you increase the power level to the same settings as 7000 series you will see gains. Is it enough to justify the price difference? Only each user can answer that.

yeah, thats the key

pc9700.png

With these SKUs at stock (9600X, 9700X and 9900X), you'll have only a little better perfomance, but with a lot less power consumption. If you want to see good gains, crank up PPT.
 

In2Photos

Platinum Member
Mar 21, 2007
2,626
2,794
136
With these SKUs at stock (9600X, 9700X and 9900X), you'll have only a little better perfomance, but with a lot less power consumption. If you want to see good gains, crank up PPT.
The thing is, this type of information won't be available in most reviews today. We'll have to wait for the more in depth stuff in the weeks to come. But the naysayers will have already poo-pooed the CPUs by then.
 

Gideon

Platinum Member
Nov 27, 2007
2,044
5,103
136
In Techpowerup review the 9600X at least seems to more consistently outperform 7600X in games (but the overall uplift remains quite similar ~4%

 

Ghostsonplanets

Senior member
Mar 1, 2024
774
1,228
96
In Techpowerup review the 9600X at least seems to more consistently outperform 7600X in games (but the overall uplift remains quite similar ~4%

Negligible gains, yeah. In some cases, it translates to 1 FPS gain.
 

MS_AT

Senior member
Jul 15, 2024
941
1,866
96
AT posted surprisingly high gain on gcc subtest of SPEC, tough compared to 7700, but it's 17 %

Edit:
They have also significantly updated details about the test environment for SPEC, newest CLANG, enabling AVX512 and specifying the WSL version used. Nice:)
 
Last edited:

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
788
2,855
106
The thing is, this type of information won't be available in most reviews today. We'll have to wait for the more in depth stuff in the weeks to come. But the naysayers will have already poo-pooed the CPUs by then.
Deservedly so. 2 years between CPUs and a brand new core for non-existent gains.
They could've achieved that by iterating on the existent core lol.
 

Rheingold

Member
Aug 17, 2022
72
204
76
The SKUs have one problem: Despite apparent price reduction to the previous generation, they are too expensive:

1723037539687.png

If we apply the Scooby Doo Unmasking meme to the 9700X and 9600X, and correctly name them 9700 and 9600, then they are reaching the market at 30 USD more for the 8-core model and even 50 USD more for the 6-core model, compared to the previous generation models. That's why everybody correctly identifies them as too expensive, even before looking at obviously lower prices for the previous generation.
 

leoneazzurro

Golden Member
Jul 26, 2016
1,114
1,867
136
While as an upgrade path Zen5 is a "meh" (and it makes me wonder if N3 being too expensive atm is part of the cause for this) there are positives. Comparing it to the 7800X3D in gaming is just stupid, the gains are there if you look at the comparison with the 7700X-7800X (which consume more) and 7600X. Application performance is held back by the TDP decrease - and according to italian Hwupgrade review, the power consumption is quite different.


Temperatures are also quite lower but for that there is also the new temperature monitoring system to take in account.
What's funny is that with Zen4 AMD was bashed because it raised the TDP to get more performance, now it is bashed because it tried to maximize efficiency at the expense of max performance.