Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 794 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
So Mike Clark wasn’t lying when he said it would take the software time to catch up

Just none of us thought “the software” could be Windows OS and the time to catch up would be a week or two

This makes their delayed launch look even more stupid, why wouldn’t they have waited for this update first? Maybe AMD thought it would be out sooner?

Wonder if there is a snowball’s chance this will be backported to Win10
 

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,319
1,986
106
Strix is slower in Windows compared to Linux anyway, and all the laptops are shipped with the 24H2 update.
True, but we never had a point of reference for Strix without the update. Even if it still doesnt match Linux, if its + 2% or 3% from what we have currently, its something tangible.
 

Mahboi

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2024
1,058
1,969
96
Literally "download more FPS"

LOL
Me and the people I've talked to are all legitimately very confused:
Should we be mad that for years we lost ~10% gaming performance and possibly also productivity perf?
Should we be happy that we suddenly gain ~10% performance 4 entire years after Zen 3 came out and 2 years after Zen 4?

We're all very, very, very confused about how to feel about AMD...

STOP AUTISTICALLY GIVING ME THOUGHT OUT RESPONSES
IT'S A JOKE POST
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and carancho

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,910
7,016
136
Me and the people I've talked to are all legitimately very confused:
Should we be mad that for years we lost ~10% gaming performance and possibly also productivity perf?
Should we be happy that we suddenly gain ~10% performance 4 entire years after Zen 3 came out and 2 years after Zen 4?

We're all very, very, very confused about how to feel about AMD...
Well you bought it with the advertised performance, and now you get something extra. Also, if they had known about the performance issue and fixed it they would have charged more for their processors, so if anyone should be mad it is the AMD shareholders :p
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,700
406
126
Me and the people I've talked to are all legitimately very confused:
Should we be mad that for years we lost ~10% gaming performance and possibly also productivity perf?
Should we be happy that we suddenly gain ~10% performance 4 entire years after Zen 3 came out and 2 years after Zen 4?

We're all very, very, very confused about how to feel about AMD...
One assumes the purchase was made based on the known performance, so more performance can only be good.

But it should be known by now that from Intel, Nvidia and AMD, AMD is the worst at getting the most performance from hardware via software optimisations, probably because they historically were the lowest marktshare and/or had the least resources to spend on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kryohi and carancho

inquiss

Senior member
Oct 13, 2010
511
768
136
Me and the people I've talked to are all legitimately very confused:
Should we be mad that for years we lost ~10% gaming performance and possibly also productivity perf?
Should we be happy that we suddenly gain ~10% performance 4 entire years after Zen 3 came out and 2 years after Zen 4?

We're all very, very, very confused about how to feel about AMD...
You paid the price based on the lower performance and you get the extra performance now. Had these chips performed as well as with this update they may have cost more. You paid the price of the lower performance, were happy with that, then got the extra performance without paying. Don't see how this is a bad thing at all.