- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,779
- 6,798
- 136
Why bring TDP into this at allYeah, unclear what that means. Are they talking about perf/watt? If so and it has 200W TDP, it ought to mean noticeable perf increase over 9950X3D which has 170W TDP. This since 200W > 170W, and 9950X3D2 also has better perf/watt.
AMD disagrees with you since 9950X3D2 is about to be launched based on the latest info/leaks.
Well, if it makes money and generates views…It can still not make much sense and AMD does it anyway.
Because we're not only in power limit land (it depends on the use cases and the user's needs). And when comparing total perf, it will be higher at 200W compared to 170W TDP.Why bring TDP into this at all
Just keep your head in power limit land and keep things simple
You also have the case with 9T-16T (note: not 9C/17T to 16C/32T).In any case, the key "problem" with this part is its name. It should be named Eypc something or another to keep gamers and YouTuber's filthy paws away from it.
What on earth are you on about? TDP does not matter. AMD can say it's 65W TDP and still set the PPT to 200W.Because we're not only in power limit land (it depends on the use cases and the user's needs). And when comparing total perf, it will be higher at 200W compared to 170W TDP.
Of course, AMD is always right. I think it's pretty clearly a most useful part. AMD is talking about energy efficiency improvements on a 200W part. Neato.
So you want to see people saying 720000 j/h part ? Seems inefficient in chars alone.I could be a thing, if you count Joules it takes to complete a task.
Joule is a better unit for efficiency.
9950X3D2 is a CPU for two groups of people:hold your horses !!!
Extensive details about the CPU have still not been revealed, but when asked on Tuesday morning in a small group of journalists, AMD at least stated: Stay tuned! More information should therefore be available soon. AMD had already uploaded an image to its press area that could show a dual-X3D processor.
https://www-computerbase-de.transla...665/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-GB
The new stepping for 9500/9700F has been known for a while (stepping 1 in the CPUID).Oh, no, another victory lap for Tom from MLID incoming. He doubled and tripled down on his prediction that there will be a new stepping that will enable higher clocks. Not just for the new V-Cache processors but across the board.
Maybe a hint? Threadripper 9000 and many Turin have stepping 1 as well.Interesting. Why did they go through a new stepping for just 9500 and 9700F? Cost-cutting?
That's a truly great achievement replacing Strix (Jun 2024 - Jan 2026).Wow, 100MHz that's insane.
Same people that currently buy 9950X3D (or 9800X3D if looking for 8C).9950X3D2 is a CPU for two groups of people:
Rich AMD fans
Rich Cities: Skylines 2 players
Not exactly. 9950X3D already had the best bin of both CCD types.Same people that currently buy 9950X3D
So you don't think 9950X3D2 will perform better than 9950X3D (and 9800X3D) on average for games?Not exactly. 9950X3D already had the best bin of both CCD types.
9950X3D2 is only for people who have scheduling issues and would like to pay even more for that pleasure. That's why I really think it should be an Epyc part, but oh well.
Plus the L3 is coherent only through IF, so how much is it even going to help Cities 2 compared to 9950X3D? I would guess very little.
So you don't think 9950X3D2 will perform better than 9950X3D (and 9800X3D) on average for games?
So 9950X3D2 is for the same crowd that currently buy 9950X3D and 9800X currently after all. I.e. willing to to pay a lot to get absolutely best perf.A little better than 9800x3d / 9950x3d, but not much better than 9850x3d.
I bet it'll perform even worse than the 9800X3D on TPU summary of game performance at 720p. Maybe on par. And that's throwing 400MHz and a crap load of silicon at an already solved problem.So you don't think 9950X3D2 will perform better than 9950X3D (and 9800X3D) on average for games?
Why do you think 9950X3D2 will perform worse than 9800X3D?I bet it'll perform even worse than the 9800X3D on TPU summary of game performance at 720p. Maybe on par. And that's throwing 400MHz and a crap load of silicon at an already solved problem.
Really, really should not be marketed to gamers.
So 9950X3D2 is for the same crowd that currently buy 9950X3D and 9800X currently after all. I.e. willing to to pay a lot to get absolutely best perf.
