- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,779
- 6,798
- 136
It is just bins.It does seem like there is a manufacturing tweak / optimization rather than just better binning.
And a year and a half of normal ongoing N4 process tweaks likely increasing yield over time, so they now have capacity to do a high volume part like this.It is just bins.
Dawg this isn't 2020, N5 family ramped half a decade ago.And a year and a half of normal ongoing N4 process tweaks likely increasing yield over time
They always had but I mean why not pocket the margin.so they now have capacity to do a high volume part like this.
Process improvement doesnt stop at ramp.Dawg this isn't 2020, N5 family ramped half a decade ago.
Nothing to 'develop' here, it's mature as cow manure.Process improvement doesnt stop at ramp.
So it’s excrement now. 😂Nothing to 'develop' here, it's mature as cow manure.
You're not magically gonna get better yield or whatever when ramping a second product family on a 5yo node.
Doesnt matter bois, muh tuned Arrow Lake or Raptor Lake matches or is faster than all Zen 5 X3D series, tuned or not. Only the "smart people" know this. Only the "best" reviews reveal this fact, all other reviews showing otherwise are FUD.
I strongly doubt this. What are you basing this on?
So whats the point. It's means nothing.Hey. I didn't say it was better. I said if you tune it to within an inch of it's life, and failing y-cruncher, and give it all of the watts, you can eek out a few wins on games with a working set that fits in the 2-3 MB range and pull reasonably close in several others.
It's cool for enthusiasts to be able to do that, but let's be honest, if they put the same amount of effort into an AMD system then most of those wins would go away.So whats the point. It's means nothing.
Geekbench score for the 9850X3D
COLORFUL CVN B850M GAMING FROZEN V14A - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a COLORFUL CVN B850M GAMING FROZEN V14A with an AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D processor.browser.geekbench.com
How is the multicore score for 9850x3d lower than most of the 9800x3d submissions?
Low memory clock?
Something wrong / unoptimized with the setup if a 9850X3D loses to a 9800X3DHow is the multicore score for 9850x3d lower than most of the 9800x3d submissions?
Something wrong / unoptimized with the setup if a 9850X3D loses to a 9800X3D
Looking at this from a purely overclocking / hwbot lens:
9850X3D is a superbinned 9800X3D, how much better the silicon quality on the CCD is, depend on what sample you are comparing it against.
The very best 9800X3D can probably match it / get close, but there are very few of this caliber out there in the wild.
Average sample vs average sample i would say + ~200-300mhz clockspeed once overclocked
(difference is larger when running stock 5.2ghz vs 5.6ghz like reviewers do)
So the 9850X3D is just a way to get very strong silicon, without binning hundreds of 9800X3D's
IO-die quality (IMC/FCLK) is still all random, so no guarantee there.
If your average user already own a 9800X3D it makes very little sense to buy a 9850X3D
These new cpus are for overclockers or ppl that are building new systems.
5600/5200 = ~7.7% as the upper theoretical ST limit
Real world ~4-5%
it's passmark, you can safely ignore it.
