poofyhairguy
Lifer
- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
That speed is in line with what I get on my 290 using Claymore 9.0
There is a 9.1 now. I find it to be very stable.
The ZEC party is almost over though.
That speed is in line with what I get on my 290 using Claymore 9.0
Hey, heads up for those with Pascal based or other recent Nvidia cards, EWBFs cuda zcash miner does pretty good hashing with my 1070. On version 0.8b I get about 410H/s at my OC of +125/+500.
On a GTX 1080 I get about that with 60% TDP from EWBF's miner. The last month of improvement for CUDA has turned Pascal from an also-ran into all-conquering on ZEC.Wow, 410Sol/s on one card?!
It's not so bad, if you use the excuse that you're buying the card to game and just want to mine on the side like I did.Not bad, not bad at all. Too bad the cost to acquire one of those cards is so (relatively) high . . .
That is actually pretty good. What's the power draw on that card combo? Or can you describe the power draw on each card individually?
It takes me 2x290 and 1x480 to achieve those speeds. And I am using twice as much power at least.
What are you getting on your 1080 by itself? I didn't think the 960 would be much good at mining.
I don't have a way of 'accurately' measuring this, but the intertubes has the following:
What are you getting on your 1080 by itself? I didn't think the 960 would be much good at mining.
I find that gaming power usage differs from mining power usage. But even if you were only using 284W to get 750 Sols/s, that is pretty strong. Using Hawaii-based cards, I'm burning maybe 900w to get 1100 Sols/s on one of my rigs? Granted that's a system total at the wall, so the two numbers are not entirely comparable.